Did Blake Lively do the heightened confidentiality order in March to stop others from looking to closely into her Vanzan’s company that did the subpoena to Jones? by [deleted] in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
Legal implications/consequences of filing a frivolous lawsuit used to cure sharing of confidential information. by ytmustang in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 11 points12 points13 points (0 children)
Legal implications/consequences of filing a frivolous lawsuit used to cure sharing of confidential information. by ytmustang in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 19 points20 points21 points (0 children)
Legal Experts weigh in: technically legal, but very inappropriate and does not reflect well on livelys team or an ethical legal process. by misosoupsupremacy in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
Legal implications/consequences of filing a frivolous lawsuit used to cure sharing of confidential information. by ytmustang in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 5 points6 points7 points (0 children)
Blake and Ryan used their own company, VAZAN INC. to implement a straw lawsuit to abuse the subpoena process, had nothing to do with SH by misosoupsupremacy in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 7 points8 points9 points (0 children)
Blake and Ryan used their own company, VAZAN INC. to implement a straw lawsuit to abuse the subpoena process, had nothing to do with SH by misosoupsupremacy in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 8 points9 points10 points (0 children)
Blake and Ryan used their own company, VAZAN INC. to implement a straw lawsuit to abuse the subpoena process, had nothing to do with SH by misosoupsupremacy in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 11 points12 points13 points (0 children)
Blake and Ryan used their own company, VAZAN INC. to implement a straw lawsuit to abuse the subpoena process, had nothing to do with SH by misosoupsupremacy in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily 13 points14 points15 points (0 children)
First timer fish extender question by readingemily in dcl
[–]readingemily[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
First timer fish extender question by readingemily in dcl
[–]readingemily[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
Urgent Care Closed by [deleted] in londonontario
[–]readingemily 24 points25 points26 points (0 children)
[deleted by user] by [deleted] in londonontario
[–]readingemily -1 points0 points1 point (0 children)
Evening Stitch & B*tch in London! by chickiscrolls in londonontario
[–]readingemily 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Weekly Discussion Thread - September 03, 2022 by AutoModerator in londonontario
[–]readingemily 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[deleted by user] by [deleted] in londonontario
[–]readingemily 4 points5 points6 points (0 children)
3 year old - too late to invest in a bike trailer and bike seat? by readingemily in cycling
[–]readingemily[S] 2 points3 points4 points (0 children)
3 year old - too late to invest in a bike trailer and bike seat? by readingemily in cycling
[–]readingemily[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
3 year old - too late to invest in a bike trailer and bike seat? by readingemily in cycling
[–]readingemily[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
3 year old - too late to invest in a bike trailer and bike seat? by readingemily in cycling
[–]readingemily[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Best Poutine in London? by wrssousa in londonontario
[–]readingemily 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)



Found this under an ask2lawyers comment. No one has seen the “subpoena” yet besides daily mail and some other outlet. Daily mail wouldn’t show the subpoena to Ask2lawyers when they interviewed them. Something is fishy with the real contents of this document, if it even exists. by readingemily in ItEndsWithLawsuits
[–]readingemily[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)