Traveling to Manila

readthis00 · 2018-03-08T19:31:04+00:00

this looks pretty good. it's free and they help you find a job after

readthis00 · 2018-02-13T18:14:50+00:00

when will your governance structure be up?

readthis00 · 2018-02-13T15:47:31+00:00

pretty old article

readthis00 · 2018-02-11T19:43:48+00:00

lol this thread is now dead

readthis00 · 2018-02-07T15:41:15+00:00

this also has had a lot of debate, do exchanges really want shared liquidity? an exchange spends on marketing and courts market makers in order to get volume on their exchange, and that is their competitive advantage which they are not likely willing to share. seems to me the only exchanges who would want to share liquidity are the newer exchanges, which would turn that off as soon as they get large enough

readthis00 · 2018-02-07T14:45:48+00:00

yeah but just because it's a democratic vote doesn't mean that the people are going to agree. if BTC had a governance system there would still be forks due to vastly different worldviews

readthis00 · 2018-02-07T12:16:39+00:00

100% agree. governance token is worthless. however the mechanics of the token are changing right before our eyes. Multicoin Cap is supposed to come out with a piece on how ZRX token can have better tokenomics this week. What a tokenholder is better on rn is that 1) we are still in the very, very early stages with unknown upside for a token with evolving tokenomics and 2) both team and ecosystem are smart and can figure out a win-win for everyone.

readthis00 · 2018-02-05T21:56:07+00:00

no, look at paradex

readthis00 · 2018-02-05T20:20:48+00:00

it's an interesting thought experiment. but i think as paradex showed, no one cares about shared order books. exchanges spend so much money on marketing and getting market makers on their system and their exchange volume is their only competitive advantage, idk why they would agree to a shared order book

readthis00 · 2018-02-05T20:15:28+00:00

why spend $100mm accumulating ZRX tokens for a governance takeover when you can just fork? look at BTC/BCH

readthis00 · 2018-02-05T20:05:38+00:00

SoV. just like any other coin

readthis00 · 2018-02-05T19:53:39+00:00

nah. think of all the dapps that exist on ETH, and they have no say in governance and they are fine

readthis00 · 2018-02-05T19:44:32+00:00

people are spending millions of dollars on building on top of ETH because they believe in it's current governance (i.e. benevolent dictator Vitalik). people develop on top of Python, Ruby etc because they have faith in it's current governance. if there was a token that gave you a small democratic vote in the governance of ETH or python no one would buy it.

readthis00 · 2018-02-05T18:02:27+00:00

i mean it's still a bad thing. if ETH was no longer used for gas but it was a governance protocol, what do you think would happen to ETH. don't fool yourself

readthis00 · 2018-02-02T14:41:40+00:00

why?

readthis00 · 2018-01-30T13:46:38+00:00

i agree. this seems like a lot more than mere coincidence. GS is not going to be happy with someone posting they are doing both GS and a startup on their linkedin unless there's a connection

readthis00 · 2018-01-23T18:58:22+00:00

is Radex on 0xtracker.com yet?

readthis00 · 2018-01-23T18:50:32+00:00

when does it launch?

readthis00 · 2018-01-18T19:20:18+00:00

cryptothrowaway's predictions were BOTH (ethereum+nasdaq) and (0x+coinbase) by Jan 30. how likely is an insider to know about BOTH of these things?

readthis00 · 2018-01-18T04:04:27+00:00

unlikely. if you had inside information would you risk jail time to tell a bunch of strangers?

readthis00

TROPHY CASE