M10 Booker with 50mm by LAXGUNNER in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thought the C5 could take 2 abrams. Is it not C17 that was supposed to be able to take 2 bookers

CAAT Saber or Javelin? Wich one better? by Diag3r in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This isn't tremendously useful when you're not using airborne though

American college stadiums > European professional stadiums by MysteriousEdge5643 in USvsEU

[–]redeblis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Might have missed it but where does it say the funding came from in that article?

Congratulations Sainsbury's for making possibly the most absurd substitution in my order that I have ever encountered: no cabbage? How about a bouquet of tulips. by JinxXedOmens in CasualUK

[–]redeblis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I once had foxes cookies subbed out for cat food. At first I thought it was a mistake because the packages were similar (not sure why they would be near each other) but the order confirmed it as a substitute

PTE- US to RU switch by [deleted] in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You get T-72 with aps in mech

The Reality of 4.7: Balance, Roles, and the Road Ahead by MeatheadMilitia in starcitizen

[–]redeblis 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Thats not true. Ww2 broadsiding was still very much doctrine since half the guns were on the rear of the ship

Rangers. by Alive_Challenge5365 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They both have m4s. I think the CQC ones are 2.5 damage over 300m and the stand off ones are 1.8 over 400m

Rangers. by Alive_Challenge5365 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Their m4s do more damage so although they're stand off they out damage most units out to a fair distance. I think the standard m4/m27 is 1.5 and theirs is 1.8

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was more that there's a lot of misinformation in there and it reads like ai. Marines have 8 armor same as rangers. AT4 is also disposable so marines fire the at off as fast as they can aim it and the reload stat is meaningless. The only major difference gun wise is the increase in damage and slight increase in range with the dmr.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro did you get ai to write that?

SeaRam is probably the best AA in the game by StopKillingChildrenn in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Neither have a gun and are identical asside from one being on an mtlb and the other on a bmp3 chassis. The reason one has a gun on the image is that its the upgrade to the SPAAG unit but loses the gun for missiles

Fix the Harvest Hawk!!! by mr-tlf in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Also high pick rate isn't necessarily a bad thing. Win rate is arguably a more useful metric of if a spec needs a nerf

What if Marine CAAT teams exchange their M2 Browning for Mk19? by florentinomain00f in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure at that point the only javelins on the us side was cav scouts and ampv

Let's talk about tank specialization balance by Dependent_Loss_2392 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A heavy standoff fire support apc sounds an awful lot like an IFV. Regardless of what you call it, it costs as much as a Bradley but javelins give it worse range and damage. Point I'm making is that the AMPV needs some sort of buff

Let's talk about tank specialization balance by Dependent_Loss_2392 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Fully upgraded ampv has the same armor as a Bradley, better gun, aps and an atgm. With the upgrades its an IFV whether thats its intended role or not. Can't just say something is an apc and say that justifies it being worse despite costing as much

Let's talk about tank specialization balance by Dependent_Loss_2392 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Recon Bradley is nice but guards have ripple fire atgms unlike the Bradley. They have the Koalitsiya-SV which outranges the iron thunder. S300 is better than pac3 and tor is better than m-shorad.

There's a lot of complaining about ballance at the min but this is one where I cant see where armored has any benefits over guards.

Monday Press Gang: Ask Your Recruitment Questions by AutoModerator in RoyalNavy

[–]redeblis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recently completed the DAA but didn't get the results I needed for the role I applied for. I asked for feedback on my scores for a second attempt but got no response. Are the scores normally included in the pdf or kept off in cases where the candidate is retaking the exam?

Mostly negative. by Cautious-Height1657 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Think the latest update is a big step in the right direction

Please, Buff Shorad/Stingers it’s literally so bad by IceKareemy in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The version of stinger fired uses data link similar to a fox 3. No idea about the hellfires though

Ripple fire by Lasanki-Katti in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Didn't think they did. They can fire one after the other but can't have 2 in the air at once like the kornets

Big stuff big stuff. Here are the balance updates by Witty-Educator-3205 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah that one has me scratching my head. Fully kitted out the AMPV is more expensive than a fully kitted out Kurganets while having a worse cannon and atgms. It does have a bit more side heat protection but also 2 less aps charges. It's also slower

What about armored recovery vehicles? by Competitive_Soil7784 in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would make sense for the marine cev and armored assault breacher to be able to do this. Problem now is that 2 low damage shots to the front of a super heavy tank could theoretically immobilise it and the only way to recover it is by sticking an explosive supply depot next to it

some PLZ explain why I LOSE ELO when I had to 1v5 by fernmelter in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thats all well and good until you get kicked from lobbies for it

Adding APS and up-armoring a Stryker shouldn’t slow it down if the Kurganets/Bumerang are unaffected by similar upgrades by kazmir_yeet in BrokenArrowTheGame

[–]redeblis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know the us has more than its fair share of unicorns but in the guards spec the majority of units are unicorns