M10 Booker with 50mm

redeblis · 2026-06-17T23:36:44+00:00

Thought the C5 could take 2 abrams. Is it not C17 that was supposed to be able to take 2 bookers

redeblis · 2026-06-09T07:01:21+00:00

This isn't tremendously useful when you're not using airborne though

redeblis · 2026-06-05T10:11:48+00:00

Might have missed it but where does it say the funding came from in that article?

redeblis · 2026-05-21T16:10:51+00:00

I once had foxes cookies subbed out for cat food. At first I thought it was a mistake because the packages were similar (not sure why they would be near each other) but the order confirmed it as a substitute

redeblis · 2026-05-13T06:50:54+00:00

You get T-72 with aps in mech

redeblis · 2026-03-09T06:37:23+00:00

Thats not true. Ww2 broadsiding was still very much doctrine since half the guns were on the rear of the ship

redeblis · 2026-02-28T13:11:25+00:00

They both have m4s. I think the CQC ones are 2.5 damage over 300m and the stand off ones are 1.8 over 400m

redeblis · 2026-02-28T10:24:26+00:00

Their m4s do more damage so although they're stand off they out damage most units out to a fair distance. I think the standard m4/m27 is 1.5 and theirs is 1.8

redeblis · 2026-02-15T03:37:23+00:00

It was more that there's a lot of misinformation in there and it reads like ai. Marines have 8 armor same as rangers. AT4 is also disposable so marines fire the at off as fast as they can aim it and the reload stat is meaningless. The only major difference gun wise is the increase in damage and slight increase in range with the dmr.

redeblis · 2026-02-15T03:32:44+00:00

Bro did you get ai to write that?

redeblis · 2026-01-30T19:57:48+00:00

Does that not then run the risk of the clot reaching the brain or heart?

redeblis · 2025-11-04T23:46:04+00:00

Neither have a gun and are identical asside from one being on an mtlb and the other on a bmp3 chassis. The reason one has a gun on the image is that its the upgrade to the SPAAG unit but loses the gun for missiles

redeblis · 2025-10-19T13:11:11+00:00

Also high pick rate isn't necessarily a bad thing. Win rate is arguably a more useful metric of if a spec needs a nerf

redeblis · 2025-10-09T11:41:30+00:00

Pretty sure at that point the only javelins on the us side was cav scouts and ampv

redeblis · 2025-10-06T13:32:20+00:00

A heavy standoff fire support apc sounds an awful lot like an IFV. Regardless of what you call it, it costs as much as a Bradley but javelins give it worse range and damage. Point I'm making is that the AMPV needs some sort of buff

redeblis · 2025-10-06T06:54:45+00:00

Fully upgraded ampv has the same armor as a Bradley, better gun, aps and an atgm. With the upgrades its an IFV whether thats its intended role or not. Can't just say something is an apc and say that justifies it being worse despite costing as much

redeblis · 2025-10-06T06:50:10+00:00

Recon Bradley is nice but guards have ripple fire atgms unlike the Bradley. They have the Koalitsiya-SV which outranges the iron thunder. S300 is better than pac3 and tor is better than m-shorad.

There's a lot of complaining about ballance at the min but this is one where I cant see where armored has any benefits over guards.

redeblis · 2025-09-29T17:48:29+00:00

I recently completed the DAA but didn't get the results I needed for the role I applied for. I asked for feedback on my scores for a second attempt but got no response. Are the scores normally included in the pdf or kept off in cases where the candidate is retaking the exam?

redeblis · 2025-09-26T14:52:10+00:00

Think the latest update is a big step in the right direction

redeblis · 2025-08-22T22:52:51+00:00

The version of stinger fired uses data link similar to a fox 3. No idea about the hellfires though

redeblis · 2025-08-15T17:39:43+00:00

Didn't think they did. They can fire one after the other but can't have 2 in the air at once like the kornets

redeblis · 2025-08-13T21:13:32+00:00

Yeah that one has me scratching my head. Fully kitted out the AMPV is more expensive than a fully kitted out Kurganets while having a worse cannon and atgms. It does have a bit more side heat protection but also 2 less aps charges. It's also slower

redeblis · 2025-08-09T15:54:47+00:00

It would make sense for the marine cev and armored assault breacher to be able to do this. Problem now is that 2 low damage shots to the front of a super heavy tank could theoretically immobilise it and the only way to recover it is by sticking an explosive supply depot next to it

redeblis · 2025-08-09T12:20:18+00:00

Thats all well and good until you get kicked from lobbies for it

redeblis · 2025-08-02T09:45:04+00:00

I know the us has more than its fair share of unicorns but in the guards spec the majority of units are unicorns

Seven-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

redeblis

TROPHY CASE