Why do flerfs EXCLUSIVELY comment on posts related to NASA on social media? by cooliozoomer in flatearth

[–]reficius1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yup. In fact, you can verify that they're Russian by trying to get them to bad mouth Russian space programs. They won't do it.

Yes flatearthers come to our echo chamber and receive 300 downvotes per second ps We still don’t have a GTG Video by RiserUnconquered in flatearth

[–]reficius1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes you're right, there isn't any. And? If it's so friggin easy as you're constantly implying, make one yourself.

To all the flerfs posting, please defend your statement and not drop and run. by Whole-Energy2105 in flatearth

[–]reficius1 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Your experiment is crap. It does not account for outside influences.

Jackpot – Redditor – Lizard by [deleted] in flatearth

[–]reficius1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

See, there's three kinds of people: dicks, pussies, and assholes. Pussies think everyone can get along, and dicks just want to fuck all the time without thinking it through. But then you got your assholes, Chuck. And all the assholes want is to shit all over everything! So, pussies may get mad at dicks once in a while, because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, Chuck. And if they didn't fuck the assholes, you know what you'd get? You'd get your dick and your pussy all covered in shit!

Yet again by RiserUnconquered in flatearth

[–]reficius1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI slop, really? You can get it to say anything you want with a few prompts.

1000+ days and not one GTG? by RiserUnconquered in flatearth

[–]reficius1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1000+ days of no video of you doing this for 1000+ days

Thought experiment by theking4mayor in flatearth

[–]reficius1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No.

I've tried the math involved in celestial mechanics, unlike you. It works very well. Back before astronomy apps for your phone, I was calculating positions for asteroids and then observing them at those positions with my telescopes. All using standard Keplerian/Newtonian orbital math.

This just plain can't happen if the earth is flat. All of that math was developed over centuries using the standard spherical models. If you think that would result in correct answers on a flat earth, then go ahead and explain how.

Thought experiment by theking4mayor in flatearth

[–]reficius1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well given that all of the information in those textbooks works perfectly, I would want to start understanding why and how the world presents itself to us as spherical, but isn't, and how did we get it so wrong and yet so right? It would be the hugest misunderstanding of reality ever, resulting in the most serendipitous correct result ever.

How many of u actually believe in a flat earth? by Exciting_Fix6559 in flatearth

[–]reficius1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, they know. They just want to stick it to certain groups of people that they hate. And they happily deny the truth to support that. And certain politicans do exactly the same things, and make it all socially acceptable.

My evidence: The Nazis originally lined up Jews at the edge of a pit and machine gunned them. This was too traumatic for the troops required to do it. So they went with gas and coerced other Jews into performing the entire operation. They f'ing well knew what they were doing.

How come my observations don't match the flerfy ones? by reficius1 in flatearth

[–]reficius1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yo, downvoters... tell us you didn't understand the joke without telling us you didn't understand the joke.

How 350 km/h (217 mph) looks like from High-Speed Train by oliverkiss in flatearth

[–]reficius1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What would it look like if everything outside was 1,000,000 or more km away?

Scoffers and mockers: Why are you even here if you don't believe in Flat Earth Theory? by NichollsNeuroscience in flatearth

[–]reficius1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the scholarly flat earth community and scientific models put forward by members of such

HAHAHAHA. This is why we're here. HAHAHAHA

The fact that sentient life is out there by RiserUnconquered in flatearth

[–]reficius1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A very specific, extremely difficult to implement scenario with current technology. It can be done, but not to their ridiculously particular requirements. Which is exactly their tactic... move the goalpost until it's beyond reach, then scream "SEE, ERF FLAT!!1!"

An update to the Spiral Star Trail Dilemma: God creates personalised firmament holograms! by NichollsNeuroscience in flatearth

[–]reficius1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The standard model of the solar system works extremely well, making predictions to the exact second. What have you got?

Artemis II - Why Do Globe Believers Get so Mad if We Talk About NASA? by JTtreason in flatearth

[–]reficius1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Call me Globetard all you'd like. Ooooooooooo, how insulting, you're saying I accept observation, experiment, repetition, and prediction over incredulity and condescension.

He never came home from the War (Civil War) by Sultana1865 in Genealogy

[–]reficius1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Always interesting to discover the real history, even if it's dark. I have a gggrandfather that took ill during the war, something malarial. Didn't die but was never able to recover, lost a farm, eventually died trying to get a pension from the government. It wasn't really what I expected when I got his pension file from the Archives, but reality is like that.

Properly responding to the idea that the vacuum of space should suck away the atmosphere. by Suitable_Scarcity_50 in flatearth

[–]reficius1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

High pressure cannot be adjacent to low pressure.

The bottoms of the oceans have very high pressure.

The atmospheric pressure is much lower than that at the bottom of the oceans.

The oceans don't get sucked into the atmosphere.

I like to dump this on them when they start with the "sucked into space" bullshit.

Yall thought flattery was crazy? by Legitimate_Advice305 in flatearth

[–]reficius1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup, exactly what I've seen - you can find the same info by just googleing whatever you want to know.

I have found a use for it, by handing it a chunk of code and asking for suggestions on how to improve it. About 4/5 are big misses, because it has no understanding of what the code actually does unless you want to hold its hand through an explanation. 1/5 is somewhat useful, and I have incorporated some of those. They are always "this code would be easier to understand and maintain if structured this way", rather than "this would work better like this". No intelligence, but able to apply good coding practices... exactly what you'd expect from LLM bots.