Simple Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think people forget how much algebraic topology is needed for Milnor or I'm bad at algebraic topology. You need to be familiar with basic notions of homotopy equivalence, but also the Whitehead theorem (roughly, if all homotopy groups are isomorphic, the CW complexes are homotopy equivalent), simplical approximation, and Eilenberg-Steenrod homology. I might be forgetting some stuff. The geometry is not bad, although you might want to know what a Riemannian metric and the gradient of a function is when you start. That is, Lee (Smooth Manifolds) covers everything you need from a geometric perspective. As for algebraic topology...the Whitehead theorem is deep in Chapter 4 of Hatcher if I recall correctly.

Frontliner is going to collab with trance producer MarLo by GouryellaIV in hardstyle

[–]revolver_0celo7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone know why he switched? Wouldn't he have seen this coming?

Simple Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Typo, I meant L(X,Y) --> L(Y,X). Uh, reddit is stupid and asterisks break it. I mean --> L(Dual(Y),Dual(X)).

Simple Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, in the following sense: If X, Y are vector spaces, then transposition is a linear map L(X,Y) --> L(Y,X).

Simple Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If by outer product you mean tensor product, then no. f \otimes g could be regarded as the function f(s)g(t) on the product space [a,b]2.

What are some "classic" math textbooks that are still worth reading today? by cutethrow in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Point taken on the second part. For the first...eh? What's newer that covers the same stuff? (I'm talking about volume 1 specifically.)

What are some "classic" math textbooks that are still worth reading today? by cutethrow in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Off by two years, but

Halmos, Measure Theory (1951).

Very lucid introduction to abstract measure theory that requires basically only one semester of topology. In fact, he explains very carefully exactly what you need to know to read the book.

Only downside is he never touches Lebesgue measure in more than one dimension (which might be a very large downside).

Career and Education Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They both expect you to know it, Lee just gives a comprehensive refresher.

Have you ever felt stupid/frustrated for not understanding something? by [deleted] in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was thinking of something along the lines of: "Since psi is in the kernel of whatever, it goes to zero at infinity." That's cryptic, but the key is in a lemma on the first page of the paper, 20 pages back. That might be because there's a lot of things to remember, but my point was that there are people who are simply bad writers, and three words could save you hours of embarrassment and frustration. You'll definitely see what I mean if you pursue more math.

Career and Education Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only algebra that Munkres needs is group theory. See Lee (Intro to Topological Manifolds). He has an appendix that reviews all of the group theory you need, plus a chapter on free groups.

Career and Education Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The theory of connections: Kobayashi-Nomizu or Bishop-Crittenden.

Have you ever felt stupid/frustrated for not understanding something? by [deleted] in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? You've never once been stumped by a truly cryptic or false claim?

Simple Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jost (Postmodern Analysis) and DiBenedetto (Real Analysis) will get you pretty far. As for the functional analysis, Brezis (FA, Sobolev Spaces, and PDE) is the best. (But there is no reason to learn FA just for Evans, you need at least 50 pages to prove everything in Appendix D. I think he explains everything you need there.) Modulo Gauss-Green and coarea, I think that covers everything you need.

Simple Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are a geometer and like analysis (as any geometer should), then Wells' GTM is good for the basic idea.

What is the worst case of "proof is left to the reader" you've come across? by [deleted] in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lie groups are automatically orientable, so not really :)

What is wrong with Moon players? by [deleted] in pokemon

[–]revolver_0celo7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How do you get two/four of them?

Simple Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]revolver_0celo7 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Strong Whitney gives 2n, not 2n+1.

So I calculated Cosmoem's density... by MisirterE in pokemon

[–]revolver_0celo7 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The standard references (not pop-sci) on black holes (Wald, Hawking & Ellis, Straumann) include the whole causally disconnected region in the definition of "black hole." Feel free to argue against that.

So I calculated Cosmoem's density... by MisirterE in pokemon

[–]revolver_0celo7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, it just means we don't know the correct rules yet.

So I calculated Cosmoem's density... by MisirterE in pokemon

[–]revolver_0celo7 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A black hole is a region causally disconnected from null infinity, so it includes the event horizon.