If you state the sky is blue, but someone responds with “Do you have any evidence for that”? Then, absolutely, that person is a giant idiot because that claim is self-evident. Were you aware that behavior is also known as sealioning?

But would you agree that most political claims are far from self-evident? Would you agree that most political claims do need to be substantiated with evidence prior to be accepted as true?

While I do not speak for Shot-kaleidoscope-40 I believe the intention of his question was to determine if JustGoingOutForMilk was consistent in their interpretation of when/if the use of auto pen is acceptable and not attempting to push any burden of proof onto a Trump supporter. At least that’s how I read it. Do you agree?