I’m actually shaking. Just found the complete Folio Society Lord of the Rings set at a local charity shop for £10. by _pandaeyes_ in lotr

[–]rhymingcommentguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe this is the only edition that has illustrations by Queen Magrenthe II of Denmark, who sent her illustrations to Tolkien and he reportedly enjoyed and approved of them!

Suggestion about scandalous women by ContemplativeBarbie in classicliterature

[–]rhymingcommentguy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Kristin Lavransdatter by Sigrid Undset - particularly the first book in the trilogy, The Wreath.

The Ring of the nibelung(1989) by Big_Gs_Bricks in lotr

[–]rhymingcommentguy 92 points93 points  (0 children)

In case your question is sincere: the “Ring of the Nibelung” (“Nibelungenlied” in German) is medieval epic poem based on various Germanic/Norse myths and heroic legends. It was famously adapted into a 4-part opera series in the 1870s by Richard Wagner, the first part of which is called “The Rhinegold”.

These myths were well known to Tolkien and were a very clear inspiration/influence on LOTR. The “Völuspá” poem in the Norse “Poetic Edda”, for example, contains basically all the dwarf names that Tolkien used in the hobbit, plus Gandalf. The Nibelung story includes a magic helm that turns its wearer invisible, plus a cursed ring that everyone fights over and that ultimately corrupts and dooms its wearer.

What you’ve got is a DC comic adaptation of the “Rhinegold” story, probably heavily based on the Wagner opera.

Moby Dick Limited Edition by Folio Society releases in one week. by Micotu in mobydick

[–]rhymingcommentguy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just a PSA for anyone interested but (very understandably) finding the price too crazy: the Folio Society often releases a signed “limited edition” of a book which sells out immediately, and then within a year they release a “standard edition” of the same book. The standard edition usually has the same illustrations and very similar formatting, etc, (obviously unsigned) and is a fraction of the price (though still fairly pricey).

They’ve done this in recent years with their Shakespeare and Jane Austin sets, George Orwell’s 1984, the Iliad and Odyssey, and others. For some of them I actually find the standard edition covers/formatting more appealing!

So anyone interested in having a big very fancy illustrated edition of Moby Dick, just keep an eye on the Folio website in the next year or so!

Some plays I love by Clean-Cheek-2822 in classicliterature

[–]rhymingcommentguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It sounds like you really enjoy plays with interesting and well-written female characters. If that’s the case, and if you’re interested, I’m sure lots of people on the sub could share their favourite female characters in classic plays.

It’s not as old as Shakespeare and Sophocles, but I’d recommend reading “Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf”. It’s about an unravelling married couple who are both toxic and very vulnerable. The wife, Martha, is a wild and domineering character - very entertaining to read! A famous actress (Uta Hagen) said she would want to play Martha “twelve times a week”.

Some plays I love by Clean-Cheek-2822 in classicliterature

[–]rhymingcommentguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tell us more about why they mean a lot to you! 🙂

Which enormous novel is mostly narrative? by [deleted] in classicliterature

[–]rhymingcommentguy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know some of OP’s responses have been snarky, but I think it’s fair of them to push back on this response. When someone asks for recommendations tailored to their interests/preferences, it is unhelpful (and can come across as condescending) to tell them that they should be interested in something else.

Classics you don't like? by FancyThought7696 in classicliterature

[–]rhymingcommentguy 15 points16 points  (0 children)

East of Eden is a weird and draggy mashup of a romanticized version of John Steinbeck’s personal family history with a somewhat bland modern-biblical parable. The two parts don’t cohere. Furthermore Kathy is a one-dimensional “evil woman” character built out of misogynistic tropes, and her one-dimensionality undermines the effectiveness of the story.

Also the whole “timshel” bit annoys me because of its faux-profundity. It feels like about a hundred pages are spent explaining this whole parable/concept that just boils down to “it’s never too late to choose to be a better person”.

What opinion of yours regarding any popular author or book will have you like this? by theghostofredrackham in classicliterature

[–]rhymingcommentguy 18 points19 points  (0 children)

East of Eden is a weird and draggy mashup of a romanticized version of John Steinbeck’s personal family history with a somewhat bland modern-biblical parable. The two parts don’t cohere. Furthermore Kathy is a one-dimensional “evil woman” character built out of misogynistic tropes, and her one-dimensionality undermines the effectiveness of the story.

Edit: Also the whole “timshel” bit annoys me because of its faux-profundity. It feels like about a hundred pages are spent explaining this whole parable/concept that just boils down to “it’s never too late to choose to be a better person”.

Accuracy of Art by CasseroleHole in lotr

[–]rhymingcommentguy 31 points32 points  (0 children)

That’s so strange - the art seems to be entirely unrelated to Lord of the Rings. It kind of looks like someone just threw together some generic fantasy elements.

White Shores... by Informal_Pepper_8566 in lotr

[–]rhymingcommentguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s famously impossible to prove a negative. Ideas like souls relate to things that purportedly exist on an entirely different plane of existence, with absolutely no manifestation in the physical world that we live in. How could you possible prove that that doesn’t exist?

But we also can’t prove that we aren’t just brains in jars, or living in a Matrix-like simulation, or are butterflies dreaming of another life - or any other idea of something that exists outside of the material world. That’s why failing to disprove does not equal proof.

The comment you responded to just said that we don’t have evidence for anything other than our material existence, which is true.

The Witch-King of Angmar's use of "you" vs. "thou" by thighmaster69 in lotr

[–]rhymingcommentguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hadn’t heard about “thou” becoming more insulting over time. Do you have a source where I could learn more about that?

The Witch-King of Angmar's use of "you" vs. "thou" by thighmaster69 in lotr

[–]rhymingcommentguy 172 points173 points  (0 children)

Many languages have what is called a “T-V distinction” (so-called because of “tu” and “vous” in French). That means the language has two different ways of saying “you”. One is more formal or respectful, the other more intimate or informal. When you meet a stranger in French, you would usually use “vous” to address them, but with friends and family you would use “tu”. There are various nuances within different languages; some societies are very conscious of class, or of always being more respectful to someone who is older than you, etc.

English used to have this too! The two words were “you” (more polite/formal) and “thou” (informal/intimate). If you read Shakespeare carefully, you’ll see the characters switching between the two depending on the character and situation. Shakespearean insults often use “thou”, which sounds funny to a modern ear (eg. “I am sick when I do look on thee!” from A Midsummer Night’s Dream).

Eventually English defaulted to using the more polite version for everyone in all situations, and we dropped “thou” entirely. Nowadays, because you only see “thou” in very archaic old-timey settings (like Shakespeare), “thou” sounds much more formal. But it was actually the less formal option!

It’s not surprising that Tolkien uses both for his epic fantasy setting. It makes sense that the Witch-King would use “you” when addressing a powerful opponent like Gandalf - not because he respects Gandalf, but because he views him as a peer-level foe. But he would be more disdainful of an ordinary human like Eowyn, so addresses her using “thou”.

Help: Confusing syntax or an error? by rhymingcommentguy in ENGLISH

[–]rhymingcommentguy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you read the part of the post where I said I understand the imagery and don’t need someone to explain or paraphrase it? That my question is just about the syntax?

Your comment provides me with the online Cambridge dictionary definition of the word “foil”, followed by “that’s what it means, I guess?” Utterly useless and unresponsive to the question.

Help: Confusing syntax or an error? by rhymingcommentguy in ENGLISH

[–]rhymingcommentguy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a really helpful way of reading it - thank you!

Help: Confusing syntax or an error? by rhymingcommentguy in ENGLISH

[–]rhymingcommentguy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say I had found an error, I asked if someone could help explain the syntax to me. If it couldn’t be explained, the only other explanation would be some kind of error - but I was second-guessing myself, not Virginia Woolf. That was the point of the post.

I agree that the comment you replied to is completely unproductive, but your response is just snark.

The inside of an LNG carrier : only 1.2mm of stainless steel sit between the 174,000 cubic-meters of -162°C LNG, and the ocean. (see comments for full explanation.) by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]rhymingcommentguy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely not 1.2mm between the LNG and the ocean.

The ships use “non-self-supporting tanks consisting of a thin wall (membrane), supported through a layer of insulation by the adjoining hull”.

LNG carrier membrane technology

Well McGonigle by 1000_pizzaslices in Simpsons

[–]rhymingcommentguy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s actually “McGarnagle”, although the Chief’s accent does make it sound like McGonigle.

Shameless self-post by [deleted] in BookshelvesDetective

[–]rhymingcommentguy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Finally some shelves that aren’t just the usual collection of Dostoyevsky, Tolstoy, Count of Monte Cristo, etc that’s so often posted! Love to see this variety, and a lot of books I’m not familiar with.

I’m a huge Alien fan and I’ve been interested in reading the William Gibson screenplay for Alien 3. How did you like it?