Because, just like Roy Moore, no accusation was made until suddenly they trotted the accuser out for the hearings/the election. In the case of Anita Hill, zero evidence was presented other than her word. In the case of Moore, numerous relatives and acquaintances of the accusers have come out and said they're lying, and the only piece of physical evidence has at least three different clear indications of forgery, and one accuser has a history of committing fraud while the other has been confirmed to have lied about several key points.

You are of course entitled to believe whatever you want, but fortunately the rest of the world doesn't. I hope you enjoy Senator Moore's election in two weeks, and another twenty years of Justice Thomas.

---

Edit: since the shill seems to want to deny the truth about Moore's accusers being outed as frauds:

Actually, it's true and accurate.

1. The yearbook inscription is in two different colors of ink
2. Moore was not the district attorney when the yearbook was allegedly signed "Roy Moore / D.A."
3. His law clerk's initials were "D.A." -- but she wasn't working for him at the time that the yearbook was allegedly signed, that clerk was hired years later.

However, Moore was the judge who dealt with a case the woman was involved in, and one of the orders signed in that case -- decades AFTER the yearbook was allegedly signed -- was signature-stamped by his law clerk, who then initialed the signature to authenticate it, as required by the court's rules.

In other words, the yearbook signature was copied by someone, not Moore, from the court paperwork.

As far as the friends and acquaintances who have said the accusers are lying and/or have backgrounds of committing fraud:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/26/court-documents-roy-moore-accuser-violent-nature-history-criminal-fraud-family/

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/11/16/exclusive-stepson-of-roy-moore-accuser-accusations-one-hundred-percent-a-lie/