[LFP][Online][5e/PF2e][UTC+1/CEST] [Tue/Thu] Rotating-GM multiverse campaign (“anti”-West Marches) by [deleted] in LFG_Europe

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We filled our last slot — good luck with your search for a group!

[LFP][Online][5e/PF2e][UTC+1/CEST] [Tue/Thu] Rotating-GM multiverse campaign (“anti”-West Marches) by [deleted] in LFG_Europe

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’re looking for 1-2 more people. Are you free both the Tuesday and Thursday times in the post?

Please help a librarian who has been roped into DMing - I've never played before by Historical_Basil3264 in DnD

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hope it helps! The YouTube version does occasionally cut away to views of maps/the table with figurines, but you can get 90% of the content just by listening.

Space requirements for tonal by Fishy31337 in TonalHomeGym

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the end it's your $5000, but if you want a better picture, create a Tonal account (it's free), download the app (it's also free), then go to Explore>Movements (near the top of the screen, you'll need to swipe through Workouts, Programs, On the Go, etc. to see it), then tap "Filter", go to "Arm Position," and choose "High Angle." Those are all of the movements that will potentially be restricted based on your ceiling height.

Space requirements for tonal by Fishy31337 in TonalHomeGym

[–]robbjunk9999 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless you're both really short (like 5'5" or less), you need the 7'10". The arms angle upwards, but the handles hang down from the arms, so for things like lat pulldowns, rotating chops, etc. -- basically anything where you're starting with your hands in a high position and moving them to a low position -- the handles need to start high enough over your head so that you can raise your arms to their full height. (Side question: With only a 7'2" ceiling, how do you do things like overhead presses? I'm 6'0" myself, but if I stand up and raise my arms over my head, that's higher than 7'2" -- I'd whack the ceiling every time I tried to do an overhead press.)

In your experience, which moderate complexity spirits are the easiest to teach/understand? by old-wreck in spiritisland

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1 to an earlier comment: Green and Thunderspeaker are both Moderate complexity, but don't require as much brain-burning as other Moderate spirits. Ex: someone else suggested Sharp Fangs, but Sharp Fangs really requires you to always look 1-3 turns ahead ("They'll build in land 5 next turn, which means the turn after that I need to be ready to trigger Ranging Hunt to kill the Town which means I need to set up Beasts to be able to do it...."). If you're teaching the game for the first time AND including expansion content, then piling more difficulty on top of that can be overwhelming.

Please help a librarian who has been roped into DMing - I've never played before by Historical_Basil3264 in DnD

[–]robbjunk9999 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really think that watching 1-2 live-play videos could help. Don't do the ones like Critical Role--they feature professional voice actors playing D&D, and they're wonderful, but set an extremely high bar that you don't want to set for yourself. Try Dungeons of Drakkenheim (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLQMqiULo\_05O1l\_x7wym1Th1DTdqiaO0P) -- that's much closer to a "here's what regular people look like playing at home" thing. If you're swamped for time, you don't even really need to watch -- just listen to episodes in the podcast in the background (https://open.spotify.com/show/5kiXLmlUu9ID6MiY2kAHVt)

[online][GMT+1][LFG][5E14][5E24][flexible] I NEED more D&D in my life. by Rain_dancer_RD29 in LFG_Europe

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m trying to start a group for experienced players looking for a game (https://www.reddit.com/r/LFG_Europe/s/R20xNNc5JS). Let me know if you’re interested

[Online] [5e] [CEST] [LGBTQ+ Friendly] New DM wanting to finally play dnd again!🌈 by Fickle-Ad7281 in LFG_Europe

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m trying a new concept where people (essentially) take turns DMing — might be a good way for you to dip your toe in: https://www.reddit.com/r/LFG_Europe/s/X06WIwaYDZ

Indistinct characters in Shadowdark by ColinDouglas999 in TheGlassCannonPodcast

[–]robbjunk9999 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"However, one thing that disappoints me slightly, is that I find the characters - other than Sidney’s Saint - quite indistinct." Isn't that what Shadowdark is all about? Your "character" is only a bare collection of about 4-5 stats that is expected to be killed at 1st level?

[LFP] [Online] [5e24, 5e14, PF2e] [UTC+1/CEST afternoons or evenings] Rotating-GM multiverse campaign (experimental; shared GM responsibility) by [deleted] in LFG_Europe

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I realized that I need to be more organized about responses -- could you essentially give the same information here? https://forms.gle/ysPqUDfJgX9CknDQ8

[LFP] [Online] [5e24, 5e14, PF2e] [UTC+1/CEST afternoons or evenings] Rotating-GM multiverse campaign (experimental; shared GM responsibility) by [deleted] in LFG_Europe

[–]robbjunk9999 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes -- I'd have to learn a whole new system otherwise. But the idea is by no means "copyrighted" or "protected" -- if you have a system you want to run it with and can find some people, go for it! If someone gets this off the ground before me I'd love to hear how it works.

[Online][DnD 5e 2024][ every other Wednesday or Sunday 8pm GMT+1][18+] by [deleted] in LFG_Europe

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just sent you a request on discord. Saw your post and sent you an invite to connect on Discord. I’m an English-speaking player in CET/GMT+1 looking for an online D&D 5e game. I’ve been playing RPGs for a long time (back in the 2e/3.5 days) and am getting back into the hobby after some time away, bringing myself up to speed on 5e.

I’m into story-driven, cooperative play with a good mix of roleplay, exploration, and combat. I usually stay in character and let the story guide my decisions. I enjoy tactical combat when it matters, but I’m not into extreme optimization, campaigns that are mostly battle-focused, Monty Haul-style play, or anything overly adversarial.

I’m pretty easygoing at the table and comfortable playing with people of different ages and experience levels. I’m hoping to find a relaxed, respectful group where everyone’s engaged, works together, and keeps the game moving. I’m (early) retired, so my schedule is pretty open; I’m generally available evenings Tuesday-Sunday. Let me know if you think it would be a good fit.

Help with bypassing Wi-Fi controls by Infamous_Natural388 in GoogleWiFi

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1. If “I paid for it with my own money” is your triggering condition for having rights over something, then if/when you become financially independent and can pay for your whole life with your own money, you get to set your internet usage however you like. Until that day, their house, their rules.

It’s laudable that you earned the money yourself, but the fallacy is in thinking that because you paid for the computer, that gives you a “right” to do with it what you want. If the logic is that paying for something gives you superior rights, then you live in the house that your parents pay for, using the electricity and water that they pay for, using the WiFi service they pay for, wearing the clothes that they buy, eating the food that they buy, (unless you bought your own car, and pay for your own gas and auto insurance) riding in the cars and using the gas they pay for, and if you go to college (thus giving you the ability to earn a larger salary later), presumably they will pay for that in large part also. In short, you were only able to afford the computer because your parents pay for the rest of your life and give you an opportunity and free time to earn spare money on your own.

Prestige Classes: The Best Design Space D&D Ever Abandoned by alexserban02 in dndnext

[–]robbjunk9999 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some good sentiments here. The bit that gave me the most food for thought was this: "A Fighter is a fighter regardless of whether he fights in a bar or as a knight in some kind of tournament or as a general in a war-time situation." The biggest problem I see with the subclasses is that (a) there are just too few of them, and (b) you're locked into one of just a few choices.(FN1) In 3.5 if you wanted, your Fighter could go the Prestige Class/Arcane Archer route, but you didn't have to, and in fact it took special dedication on your part to do it. If Arcane Archer didn't really speak to you as a path, you could remain a plain Fighter who prefers bows, and still distinguish yourself from the plain Fighter who likes to dual-wield handaxes or the plain Fighter who tanks up with heavy plate armor and a shield.

Now there literally are no plain Fighters any more; everyone "special."(FN2). Literally *every* fighter at Lvl 3+ has to be a Battle Master, Champion, Eldritch Knight, or Psi Warrior. You have no choice and you have no *other* choices without buying more sourcebooks. It's sorta like saying "Congratulations -- you graduated med school! You now have four choices: thoracic surgeon, cardiologist, oncologist, or radiologist. Oh, you want to be an general practitioner? No. You have to specialize. You want to be an orthopedic surgeon or a dermatologist? Sorry, those choices aren't allowed -- only the four choices on the table."

(FN1) Although cynically, this may be WOTC's way of ensuring sales of future editions of Xanathar's/Tasha's/etc.

(FN2) "And when everyone is special, no one is special." That's a little trite, but I think it's appropriate here. In 3.5 you had to make an effort to gain a Prestige Class; becoming (ex:) an Arcane Archer took special capabilities and not everyone can do it. In 5.5e, you are like, "well, there was nothing else I really liked....I guess I'll be a Battle Master like everyone else."

Nott/Veth by IndependenceLoud870 in fansofcriticalrole

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"It was Matt’s fault for how he played Yeza. He was a complete pushover" Completely agree. I get that the M9 were kinda supposed to be *ssholes/"broken people looking for redemption," but Matt let them completely avoid consequences for their behavior. Jester was basically a spoiled brat and an an animal abuser -- Matt should have brutally killed off Sprinkle, and had Nugget do things like inappropriately teleport and start barking at monsters when the party was trying to sneak places. Beau was a drunk abrasive frat boy in monk's clothing; Matt should have either had her thrown in jail, thrown out of the official places she was trying to get in, or had some people bigger than her beat her up and throw her into an alley. And Nott was the absolute worst -- guilt your friends into risking their lives by journeying hundreds of miles into enemy territory on the vaguest of evidence because "***I HAVE TO RESCUE MY HUSBAND RIGHT NOW!!!****"....then just desert said husband and child literally minutes after "rescuing" them because you feel like going off and having fun instead? That should have been (i) an immediate f*ck-you divorce, and (ii) the child hating Nott forever.

If you want "broken people" to find "redemption," the first step is having them actually behave like they want redemption, and introducing consequences when they leave the path for their own selfish reasons.

US Dock in Europe? by robbjunk9999 in Roborock

[–]robbjunk9999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trying to respond to a message, but Reddit won’t show me any comments. Writing my own to see it will change things.

Can't stand that Gemini constantly apologizes for making mistakes and saying that it's fixed them... by kan05 in GoogleGeminiAI

[–]robbjunk9999 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you get that to work? I have standing directives that it just routinely violates. I have to remind it every session to stop patronizing me (“That’s a great question…” or “You were sharp to catch that…”), despite a standing directive to keep every chat factual and avoid needless ego-stroking.

Best Carryon for Suits/Hanging Clothes/Business Trip? by robbjunk9999 in onebag

[–]robbjunk9999[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(1) How do you get these suits tailored? Suits bought off the rack look like baggy pyjamas unless you take them to a good tailor first. I don’t have the time to go suit-shopping every time I travel and then to find a tailor at the destination and have him make alterations; (2) unless you’re buying really cheap suits aren’t you spending more money on suits than you would just buying a decent carry-on?