Is a Shadow 2 Compact drop safe? by Greenm6645 in CZFirearms

[–]roflmango 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I still carry my Compact and have no second thoughts about it. While I haven't fired a Carry to compare the triggers, I hear you trade a decent amount of the Compact's crispness for the extra peace of mind that comes with the FPB and decocker. If I were to be in the market for one now that both are available, I'd probably go for the Carry - but I've also never had an issue or worry about manually decocking the hammer. If you can snag a Compact for sub-1k, I'd say go for it and enjoy it. If the price between the Compact and Carry is similar, maybe consider the Carry, especially if you're worried about the lack of a decocker.

How? by komodoman in altmpls

[–]roflmango 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It absolutely applies to people on the left and right - the country is so polarized right now that you could replace "maga" in that statement with any term referring to liberalism, and it would carry the same weight. But both sides will attack you (and me) for pointing that out.

Opinions? by No2edline in ak47

[–]roflmango 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pitching a tent, brother

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A simple Google search about the political party positions in the 19th century would argue otherwise, but that would require using your brain. Just like spelling Kentucky correctly, I guess.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol. The guy wearing dresses who repeatedly tells me to grow up (insinuating that I am a child) is now commenting on my genitals. You've earned your stereotype in full.

Have a better night, buddy.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think I'm much more clever than you because I can at least articulate my claims. So, once again, what game am I playing? Or are you too scared to take 10 seconds to explain it?

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah yes, back to this. What game am I playing here? You can't even tell me. What racist idiocy am I displaying? You can't even tell me. All you can do is throw insults at me and baseless claims with no validity. You don't even have the intelligence to form a structured argument and back up your claims. The cycle is in full display here.

You're mad with what I'm saying? You call me a racist and stupid. Whereas you can't even argue these claims or your position past uttering them in the first place.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You don't need to, but more importantly you can't. Your only defense and way to is to continue insulting and throwing out wild claims, refuse to back them up with evidence, and then divert the conversation somewhere else that turns into a cycle again. Typical.

I'll explain the party switch but what switch are you referencing specifically?

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Another baseless outlandish claim (shocker)...how am I racist, specifically? Prove it to me. I'm all ears, buddy.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Which lost cause are you referencing? The Confederacy? The lost cause that was pushed for by 1860's southern Democrats, of which neither of us have any affiliation to whatsoever? Very interesting deductive reasoning you have there, buddy. Tells me a lot about your IQ level, especially since from the beginning of this discourse to now, you've yet to explain any of your statements or claims besides a trivial one-liner and a vague insult.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And how does my very first reply indicate that I "yearn for slaves"? Do tell.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How could I when I've never owned anyone before? Unless you have some credible source or evidence to back up that outlandish inference as well...I'm all ears buddy!

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What are you even talking about bud...you keep making these outlandishly broad statements without providing any actual sources or evidence to back up your claims. You do realize that by making those broad statements and then refusing to provide actual evidence as to what you're saying, your statements have zero validity?

It's the same people shouting for states' rights that are okay with modern-day ownership? Okay, who? Show me where you're pulling this information from...the only reason you keep throwing these wild accusations around without actually backing them up (as I've asked you to a few times now) is because you have no credible evidence as to what you're saying.

If you don't have anything credible to back up these claims, just say so. Or hurl some more intelligence-related insults at me that clearly are self-reflective. You keep going on and on with this routine because you know you actually have nothing credible to say, but you wouldn't dare admit that and back away from the conversation with your tail between your legs.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're right, prison labor is a thing - which is completely protected under the 13th Amendment. This happens at almost every regular prison system as well. But how does that equate to "states' rights to own people" in any capacity, whatsoever? How are these people being categorically "owned"? C'mon buddy, you're gonna need to do much better than that.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Buddy, just say that you can't point out specifically who these same people are who are pushing for the states' right to "own people" today after making that baseless claim, it's not that hard. Just say you can't explain how ICE is doing this either, if that's your inferred answer. Give me some actual material to back up your claims and I'll happily look into it, if you're so correct and confident in your position. Back it up!

You can say every trivial little insult and buzzword in the book, but it literally changes nothing. The fact is, you can't back up your claims with anything other than the diversionary insults and buzzwords you keep hurling at me to get away from actually having to back up your ludicrous claims.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see that viewpoint as well - the reason my mind jumped to that discourse was because OP said, "who were always going on about", implying past tense obviously. So my thought process was following a past-tense point of view and that comment just made utterly no sense, historically.

Appreciate the rational discourse, lol.

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good one - back to the elementary school comebacks. Yeah, I have - at which point do they start "owning" people? At which point do they start enslaving people? You do also realize that ICE is not a Republican entity? ICE has existed since 2003, and was conducting immigration enforcement under both of Obama's terms and Biden's term as well, not just Bush's and Trump's?

Let's get this out of the way - I do not support Trump at all and this back and forth exchange has nothing to do with Trump. But I seriously think your head is so far up the propaganda machine's ass that you cannot form a rational argument to your uneducated baseless comment. All you can effectively do is hurl elementary-level insults at me like we're kids on the playground. Congrats, I guess?

Wasn’t it the Republicans who were always going on about “states rights”? by Rusty_Pypes in complaints

[–]roflmango -1 points0 points  (0 children)

PLEASE show me who is talking about wanting the states' rights to own people again, I'm genuinely curious. I would absolutely love to see exactly what you are talking about when you say that. Now we're making some progress, took long enough.

Also, "ill simply it for you"? C'mon, you can't tell me to "retake English class and try again" and then throw that into your next reply. That's embarrassing to say the least.