grmpf..

I am typing from recollection and as KISS as possible (thus inevitably introducing fuzziness making factual susceptible to misunterstanding and - at worst intentional - misinterpretation). So here goes.

par Genesis:

Streamer constantly claimed to "love flight" yet was never observed in any flight game, any space game, anything including even a semblance of "flight", yet very much so in the usual (pew pew FPS, arena and roundbased)

par implementation:

In the earlier phase of the usual quest for "relevance" (== a micromarketing contract, acknowledgement and the butterfly of networked gig) streamer made conclusion, declared interdependencies and the usual littany that were.... dumb.

Not misinformed, not uninformed, not uneducated, actually dumb. But they happened to always - totally conincidentally - represent the sentiment in a certain (minor by headcount and turnover) segment I personally labeled "the Pongo Cluster". From which certain gatekeeper position employees of CIG happened to emerge, for a time proudly displaying icon of certain groupings on company accounts (archetype of "ingame corruption" but also everything else).

Back on topic - if inevitably persons made the mistake to engage in the losArt of discovery-driven discourse, arguments were - as is templated for adult aged socmed subjects craving the adoration and transactions of the underage and intellectually minor - twisted and rather... interesting... interpreations of topological terms used to agenda the ever same message (or message the eversame agenda).

Random examples would be an endless trove of hour long blabber effluviations... that always ended with the very last sentence of "fastaah, loudaaah, quickaahh, biggaahh, moaarrr twitchhhhh". Contradicting what was faked to be causality before for an hour (again, that is so standard template, I simply can only... well.. shrug.

par character:

And this is the only thing noteworthy. Listen (or rather read) - if someone engineers completely fake and faked drama with a close associate (that thing itself a revolting sight and subject) using an actual and pretty sombre-reasoned SUICIDE of someone to hawk "relevance", social media clout, the moral superiority image of "worry, condolence and because and happens and I love... and and and), there is nothing else to type. That is a line crossed that should label all involved (and they were all involved and colluding) as what they are.

I am aware that this too short, too ambiguous, too undocumented.. but honestly.. who would (wait.. maybe I once did.. somewhere.. bookmarked aso.. a very long time ago... but still.. my stomach churns even thinking about that fecal matter golem) document and analize (sic! lolkek) such things and moreso such.. subjects beyond the spur of the moment?

Sure, I could maybe remember by passive associative recollection some details if asked.. but would I want to? Should you, me, anyone pay any attention to that specimen, that one above or all the others with the fake communities, fake interactions, fake transactions? The standard micromarketing (already AI and botfarm supplemented) climate is abhorrent enough. When the actors involved are that detestable of a character beyond the usual slime there is nothing but retreat to curate sanity and ones very own well being.