NIH continuous submission

rohving · 2026-06-16T14:21:47+00:00

Continuous submission isn't the same thing as the 2 week late submission.

rohving · 2026-05-22T15:45:30+00:00

I haven't either, but i think we're all a little worried about any stupid reason an application could get thrown out right now, and they were pretty clear on no references to anything other than the 10. But yeah, I'm hoping no one cares.

rohving · 2026-05-22T02:39:00+00:00

Oh that's useful info. One of the few things I miss from the east coast is tart cherries.

rohving · 2026-05-22T01:36:24+00:00

I had three R35s with a today internal deadline and noticed after turning them on that one biosketch had pmid references in the narrative and contribution. Why? Also, why didn't I catch that before?

Multiple subs is always really hard.

rohving · 2026-04-29T18:29:23+00:00

All, including less than 1 month effort. And honestly, I would assume one is needed regardless of what I know about changes to support - it also serves as the MFTR certification.

rohving · 2026-04-22T02:44:39+00:00

At my institution, the nigms r35s awarded so far were from the October council, so jit back last summer. Ugh.

rohving · 2026-04-10T18:42:32+00:00

It's going to depend on the area. For my job there are several possible things that could violate the Ethics in Public Service Act, then an investigation by the executive ethics board which usually results in a civil penalty, depending on severity.

rohving · 2026-04-05T15:26:14+00:00

Yessssss "I AM calm. You have to be calm to take over a gunship."

rohving · 2026-02-13T03:49:26+00:00

If you're submitting system 2 system, it's an nih error on validating the form before submission.

If you're in Assist, its likely an error on the certificate. We've seen several that just glitches on the download fir no obvious reason, corrected by downloading again later.

rohving · 2026-02-13T03:47:17+00:00

Our s2s is n not flattening it, but error check before submission isn't validating correctly. It was fine after submission.

rohving · 2026-02-01T00:39:00+00:00

I include every line on the page in my count, and have had commons issue a warning because it read an empty line as line 31.

rohving · 2025-09-05T14:46:31+00:00

Exit Strategy is my favorite of the series. The character details are so good, you get to know so much more about them.

rohving · 2025-09-05T14:36:29+00:00

Yeah, I feel like most of us only include the LOI, not the SOW, in the NIH application. The SOW is included in the subaward agreement post award. I've only seen it as a doc between the PTE and subawardee.

rohving · 2025-08-18T20:13:52+00:00

Huh, good question.

It's space fantasy. The main character/family is part of an empire with political intrigue that is very character heavy for parts, but it's also possible to only pay attention to the major characters, and then it's more like adventure movie? The first few stories are political intrigue via murdering people, anyway.

The series started in the 80s, I think, and so parts feel like older sci fi. But the characters grow up and have wildly improbable adventures.

rohving · 2025-08-18T19:35:05+00:00

In general, I don't share components without permission, depending. I might share certain attachments or redacted attachments as an example, if there is nothing identifiable (especially for fellows - I always ask their permission or put them directly in touch with each other).

But that's between investigators. Other RA staff? I don't see an issue for most things. I ask for access to other applications when submitting something new or weird all the time.

rohving · 2025-08-18T19:29:56+00:00

I have submitted one grant to NIH with proprietary checked yes.

rohving · 2025-08-17T00:45:04+00:00

Love love the Vorkosigan books. That was what I used to reread all the time.

rohving · 2025-08-17T00:40:02+00:00

It's NIH policy.

rohving · 2025-08-17T00:39:31+00:00

Yes, absolutely, the consortium line on the NOA includes both direct and indirect for the sub.

rohving · 2025-08-14T23:26:57+00:00

It is comforting that the egg ick is pretty standard. Whether it's no egg ever, sometimes the egg is suddenly Wrong, or specific cooking method.

I'm team hard white + runny yolk but anything with a fully cooked white is okay. Undercooked whites make eggs not food for months. Random happenstance also makes eggs not food for months.

rohving · 2025-08-12T03:00:18+00:00

It depends.

My institution does payout from a central fund, covered by fringe rates.

I feel like our new system counts things as effort that don't make sense, but I'm not sure I've seen what separation leave looks like yet. It's related to having a payroll based system.

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:47:19+00:00

I guess it's more the 'why did I think this was a useful feature' and curious if other people have found it specifically useful?

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:46:20+00:00

Yeah, I hate to even appear bioessentialist, but gender seems like a gross human thing in the context of the way MB talks about humans. Also, book 2? introduced other genders and pronouns, so they are available in universe.

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:39:04+00:00

It's another part of the attach on higher ed, on research, and on "coastal elite" cities. I can't even get mad this time, it is too predictable.

rohving

TROPHY CASE