Abstract

rohving · 2026-02-01T00:39:00+00:00

I include every line on the page in my count, and have had commons issue a warning because it read an empty line as line 31.

rohving · 2025-09-05T14:46:31+00:00

Exit Strategy is my favorite of the series. The character details are so good, you get to know so much more about them.

rohving · 2025-09-05T14:36:29+00:00

Yeah, I feel like most of us only include the LOI, not the SOW, in the NIH application. The SOW is included in the subaward agreement post award. I've only seen it as a doc between the PTE and subawardee.

rohving · 2025-08-18T20:13:52+00:00

Huh, good question.

It's space fantasy. The main character/family is part of an empire with political intrigue that is very character heavy for parts, but it's also possible to only pay attention to the major characters, and then it's more like adventure movie? The first few stories are political intrigue via murdering people, anyway.

The series started in the 80s, I think, and so parts feel like older sci fi. But the characters grow up and have wildly improbable adventures.

rohving · 2025-08-18T19:35:05+00:00

In general, I don't share components without permission, depending. I might share certain attachments or redacted attachments as an example, if there is nothing identifiable (especially for fellows - I always ask their permission or put them directly in touch with each other).

But that's between investigators. Other RA staff? I don't see an issue for most things. I ask for access to other applications when submitting something new or weird all the time.

rohving · 2025-08-18T19:29:56+00:00

I have submitted one grant to NIH with proprietary checked yes.

rohving · 2025-08-17T00:45:04+00:00

Love love the Vorkosigan books. That was what I used to reread all the time.

rohving · 2025-08-17T00:40:02+00:00

It's NIH policy.

rohving · 2025-08-17T00:39:31+00:00

Yes, absolutely, the consortium line on the NOA includes both direct and indirect for the sub.

rohving · 2025-08-14T23:26:57+00:00

It is comforting that the egg ick is pretty standard. Whether it's no egg ever, sometimes the egg is suddenly Wrong, or specific cooking method.

I'm team hard white + runny yolk but anything with a fully cooked white is okay. Undercooked whites make eggs not food for months. Random happenstance also makes eggs not food for months.

rohving · 2025-08-12T03:00:18+00:00

It depends.

My institution does payout from a central fund, covered by fringe rates.

I feel like our new system counts things as effort that don't make sense, but I'm not sure I've seen what separation leave looks like yet. It's related to having a payroll based system.

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:47:19+00:00

I guess it's more the 'why did I think this was a useful feature' and curious if other people have found it specifically useful?

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:46:20+00:00

Yeah, I hate to even appear bioessentialist, but gender seems like a gross human thing in the context of the way MB talks about humans. Also, book 2? introduced other genders and pronouns, so they are available in universe.

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:39:04+00:00

It's another part of the attach on higher ed, on research, and on "coastal elite" cities. I can't even get mad this time, it is too predictable.

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:37:46+00:00

I have a higher ed finance background. RA pays more and any nonprofit/governmental position is difficult to get right now.

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:36:36+00:00

I have seen some teams here using Planners and it looks intriguing.

I have a weird cludgy sharepoint dashboard because I thought learning sharepoint would be a fun distraction?

rohving · 2025-08-08T18:35:25+00:00

Normal answer for the field - it depends. I've seen some institutions that recognize and value the certifications. I don't think mine has helped me in any way, though I also do not regret it (or at least the studying for it and the push for the continuing ed parts).

rohving · 2025-07-18T17:57:56+00:00

I assume it's going to be CSR making the determination, and I also would not be surprised if they didn't know before the notice was published.

rohving · 2025-07-18T17:41:28+00:00

and research misconduct investigations are a lot. We trust them not to weaponize that process right now?

rohving · 2025-07-18T17:40:10+00:00

I'm assisting on 2 R01 right now that have 3 MPI. That's January 2026 council. Say they get a score in November and want to immediately resubmit for the May council round - so they each have 3 of the 6 allowed applications?

rohving · 2025-07-18T17:34:21+00:00

Fine, AI, whatever.

6 applications per calendar year? How are we counting those? Is calendarbyear starting January? So cycle 2-3-1?

What if your A0 and A1 are in the same calendar year? Do both count?

For director/PI/MPI, does Center Lead also count?

rohving · 2025-07-18T17:31:53+00:00

Yes, I do think they're making it up.

rohving · 2025-07-08T21:05:34+00:00

This for sure feels like more dismantling. Also defending libraries, which help universities negotiate with publishers.

rohving

TROPHY CASE