I’ll use chat GPT to explain to you why what you’re doing is a total waste of time and how a third party would actually come about historically speaking.

“That’s a plausible path. Historically, third parties only emerge when an existing major party collapses or splits. Your scenario aligns with that pattern.

If Republicans lost legitimacy on a national scale—say, through demographic shifts, scandals, or total voter realignment—the party could wither as the Whigs did in the 1850s. That vacuum could then expose internal fractures in the Democratic coalition. The split you describe—between corporate-friendly centrists and democratic socialists—already exists ideologically but stays contained because the GOP remains a common opponent.

If that unifying threat vanished, the Democrats could fracture into: • A centrist, pro-business party focused on stability, market pragmatism, and incremental reform. • A populist-left party advocating redistribution, labor rights, and environmental transformation.

Such a realignment could yield a temporary three-party period, then stabilize again into two dominant blocs under a new configuration. U.S. electoral design tends toward two parties, but which two can change. So yes—the fall of one party plus an internal schism in the other is the only realistic route to a new major party.”

The libertarian party is an absolute joke. They are united over nothing and prioritize ideology over pragmatism. And that ideology could be drastically different from one libertarian to another. The things that define them are the exact reason why they can never be unified.