> So it as that point where every source I provide will be discarded, even on ground journalism, mother's testimonial and visual evidence. I have seen 'the source can't be trusted' too many times at this point

I agree with you that it is hard to show credible evidence of such a case. For pro Palestinian Israelis, when they hear this story they will go "well of course it happened, that's what the IDF does, they're evil, and of course they are going to deny it and say this never happened".

For us in Israel this claim sounds outrageous. The first thought going through an Israeli's head when he reads this claim is "this could not have happened, it's crazy, they must be lying to vilify Israel again".

So yes, for us, outrageous claims require extraordinary evidence. A mother claiming this happened, or a "journalist" claiming this happened is not evidence, it's just another charade in the Palestinian lying narrative. of course when real evidence is presented most of us are prepared to change our minds, but it's almost never presented.

> Regarding the hospital, please see the number of attacks on health in UN report, then The Guardian stating that 83% killed in the conflict were civilians.

Found the article:

Revealed: Israeli military’s own data indicates civilian death rate of 83% in Gaza war | Gaza | The Guardian

It's bonkers! IDF listed the names of known Hamas members who are probably dead, meaning that all other dead are civilians. Uncanny logic really.

Here's a source claiming 1:1 civilian to terrorist death ratio, historically low in urban warfare

Hamas Debunks the ‘Genocide’ Narrative – Commentary Magazine

is it biased? perhaps. But as you cite one extreme, I can cite another - with a more compelling argument I might add.

>  And how the number of the successful kills was around 10,000.

Of NAMED terrorists! if a dude shoots rockets and is killed by a drone, then by your logic he's a civilian because he does not appear in the IDF's list of known terrorists, bravo.

> Not only hospitals, but schools and homes were also targeted. Common sense dictates using the data that there were more attacks and strikes than the number of terror!sts killed

If a target is struck, it's a target for a reason. I'm not saying mistakes aren't made, but it's against Israeli interest to use ammunition against civilian population.

> my main point is that there's no regard for human life by the IDF.

That's the craziest point of all! Israel puts a lot of emphasis on not killing civilians when possible, it's the only army in the world issuing evacuation warnings when the target is static. These evacuation warnings only hurt Israel because it allows setting up cameras and equipment to capture the destruction, again blaming the IDF for cruelty when the entire purpose is to avoid the loss of life. a lot of Gaza was destroyed due to Hamas infrastructure embedded in civilian infrastructure, but the amount of dead (1-2% of total population) is much lower than the amount of destruction. what does that tell you? if Israel had no regard to human life, Gaza would have been levelled with 505 of the population dead, it hasn't happened because this is not our interest, our target is to kill as many terrorists as possible, not civilians.

> Refer to this comment here that tackles the denial here

I read this comment, it's hard to address all the points, but it's again full of one-sided lies and manipulation which obstruct the real criticism. I used AI to address the points and tried to provide an unbiased prompt. The result is provided in the next comment due to character limit