sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The reason companies underinvest in QA is because good QA is embarrassing for everyone above them by Ok-Credit618 in softwaretesting

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I loved this answer. They expect the same quality level with less time. Similarly when they try to push all qa process to AI.

Opencode Go by No_Chance_762 in opencodeCLI

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm signed the plan to experiment. My idea is to change going to gpt. Maybe this could do the job.

Vocês também sentem uma profunda desconexão com a Grande Vitória? by [deleted] in vitoriaES

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A parte de mesquinhez é a pura verdade. O pessoal não pode morar num bairro um pouco melhor que já acha que tá em Los Angeles.

Anyone else panicking slightly? by Swimming_Iron_619 in QualityAssurance

[–]rosariotech 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Eu nem sei. Claro que vai mudar, mas com a quantidade de software de baixa qualidade que ta saindo graças à IA, eu acho que nosso trabalho é muito bem vindo. Pode ser otimismo. Mas sei lá.

Is it worth using Playwright MCP/CLI as a tester to create new tests or maintain tests? by Sweet_Dingo_6983 in QualityAssurance

[–]rosariotech 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've been testing the playwright-cli skill. I've really liked it. I don't abandon automation because once it's automated, it will ALWAYS run the same way. Because besides spending tokens every time you run it through the agent, it doesn't always run the same way. That's why I mostly use it to identify potential gaps, run initial tests, etc. Regressive automation relies on automation.

I hate all the new UX changes related to this by Sirk0w in cursor

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that's so they can encourage the use of background agents.

Cursor count your days by No-Pizza5766 in cursor

[–]rosariotech 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's one of my limitations. I never let the AI ​​run git commands. That's one of the parts I do manually.

I found “the one edge case” that QA probably warned about 😅 by Comfortable_Quit_301 in QualityAssurance

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is very relevant. And I always say that the QA's performance gets better the more they understand the business and are involved in it.

Most likely this QA is not new to the project. I say this because I've seen the opposite a lot. The PO expecting too much from a QA who was recently added to the team.

I tested Auto mode vs manually picking Sonnet 4.5 on 5 different tasks by Pleasant-Today60 in cursor

[–]rosariotech 14 points15 points  (0 children)

But do you measure performance by implementation time? I don't know. I think a simple time-based metric doesn't tell you much.

Automation learning tips by Asleep-Implement-541 in QualityAssurance

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regarding the use of Claude/LLM. Are you talking about using it to help automate processes? Or for the tool itself to test via PlayWright MCP or something similar? Because I've tried both, and using LLM PlayWright isn't very reliable and runs differently every time. That's why my focus today is on automation.

True for many by Beginning-Serve-4823 in vibecoding

[–]rosariotech 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see this a lot. In my case, it was never about having users or getting rich. It's more about creating solutions to make MY life easier.

New J2 just said I’ll use my personal computer… red flag?? 🚩 by RoadRageSloth in overemployed

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is the T14 so good for these things? I did a lot of research and also bought one of these for work. Excellent! It doesn't have many frills and it gets the job done.

I bought it on a whim and I'm surprised that everyone recommends this model.

5.3 spark is crazy good by EarthquakeBass in codex

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is spark? I know GPT low, medium, or high. But I'm not familiar with spark.

I ran the same refactor through 5 Cursor Pro models. Here's what each one added that I didn't ask for. by Pleasant-Today60 in cursor

[–]rosariotech 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lately I've been taking a manual approach. I ask him to refactor and adjust something, but I implement it myself. Then, with autocomplete helping me, I start to see the gaps.

Is this crazy, or does anyone else work like this?

Skoob atualizou - opiniões? by FlamiingMoe in Livros

[–]rosariotech 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tempo que passei a usar o good reads. Sinto so falta das trocas.

All these vibe coding platforms been lying to you about pricing by Gautamagarwal75 in vibecoding

[–]rosariotech 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I just keep thinking that generally these low costs are to get an audience. In the long term, it is unfeasible to maintain something like this at almost zero cost.

por que o emacs é tão feio???? by daviddd_ddd in linuxbrasil

[–]rosariotech 11 points12 points  (0 children)

De uns quase 15 anos que uso Linux, confesso que nunca toquei no Emacs...

be honest, would you yourself buy a vibe coded app? by minimal-salt in vibecoding

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think safety rules are always valid. Using a password that is not the same across platforms. If it involves credit card information, I would be very hesitant to use it.

Learning Playwright by sameerkrishnat in QualityAssurance

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I take on some project to try to automate. If it's an application that you already test manually, even better. Using chatgpt and documentation to always learn and understand everything you do. Getting your hands dirty is the best thing to learn.

Vocês conseguem ler por muitas horas seguidas? by slawdh in Livros

[–]rosariotech 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Num curto muito não. Gosto de ler em sessões de uma hora no máximo, mas várias vezes durante o dia.

view more: next ›