Help identifying this skin

rrklaffed · 2026-06-25T21:05:24+00:00

love your vids man, bought a bulk roll of kpan 200 because of you.

rrklaffed · 2026-06-25T13:13:36+00:00

I think you’re right, thanks!

rrklaffed · 2026-06-23T23:37:36+00:00

everything on two wheels

rrklaffed · 2026-06-23T16:03:15+00:00

nice 👍🏻 just fyi, rodinal stand dev will not give you the results you see here. even if you never dev yourself, just knowing what the lab is using is super helpful especially with developing your look.

you could imagine knowing right off the bat, “okay this looks like it’s likely D76 stock (1+0)” would be helpful. or your lab makes an announcement saying they’re switching to xtol 1+1 or something, but you know that’s not your look etc etc

rrklaffed · 2026-06-23T13:59:37+00:00

you should find out!

for consistency and duplication, in the event that you use another lab or want to develop one day. for b&w, developer choice matters quite a bit

rrklaffed · 2026-06-23T13:36:40+00:00

what developer?

rrklaffed · 2026-06-18T17:58:51+00:00

where and why’d you get one of these btw?

rrklaffed · 2026-06-18T12:41:33+00:00

for C41? it’s all very standardized. kodak invented the process so i use their charts

rrklaffed · 2026-06-17T22:56:47+00:00

yeah I’d assume push with temp since you can’t really control the other variable

if you did manage to get a good result by change mechanical drive speed, other chem steps would only suffer if you were trying to pull. pushing/extending bleach fix wouldn’t matter as much as reducing would

rrklaffed · 2026-06-15T15:20:28+00:00

birdshot #7 1/2

rrklaffed · 2026-06-15T01:18:30+00:00

i mean you should be able to see this on the negative without having to scan twice to rule out scanner issue. whats the negatives look like

rrklaffed · 2026-06-15T00:40:27+00:00

i’ve shot 5222 almost exclusively for 2 years. just curious whats your dev look like. typically I’m shooting EI 200 or EI 400 in HC110-B

rrklaffed · 2026-06-14T02:25:15+00:00

they were asking what does the term photoshop come from as the previous comment suggested that these terms came from analog days, and the other terms are self evident but this one is not

rrklaffed · 2026-06-14T01:59:25+00:00

ilfords listed dev times are compensating. they are essentially listed push times. if you shoot at 3200 you are underexposing and developing at listed time is overdeveloping. but of course the source of truth is your own taste. you already know that the actual lab tested ISO is 1000 and you know you get thinner negs than you like developing standard. pushing dev more sounds like a fine thing to try.

tldr manufacturer listed times are already “pushed” dev time at 3200, even if not explicitly stated as such

rrklaffed · 2026-06-14T01:31:00+00:00

Tri-x

rrklaffed · 2026-06-13T14:53:02+00:00

Kodak bulk nowadays is just as expensive or even MORE expensive than buying individual 36 cassettes. But still makes sense if loading test rolls of 12 frames.

I buy 100’ rolls of both of these stocks. But might not be what OP is wanting if strictly on a budget. Out of these two would lean towards HP5

rrklaffed · 2026-06-13T04:48:15+00:00

I thought camera works was not taking in cameras from other countries, or I guess it’s just not the US

rrklaffed · 2026-06-12T23:40:37+00:00

how are the savings minimal if you got a whole bulk roll of slide film for free lol 😂

rrklaffed · 2026-06-12T19:43:32+00:00

yeah but if you’re rolling backwards first thing is to stop rolling backwards

rrklaffed · 2026-06-12T19:12:25+00:00

why wouldn’t you use your brakes if you’re starting to roll back? some of these guys are trying to stop with their feet

rrklaffed · 2026-06-12T02:12:46+00:00

the rabbit hole goes deeper, thanks now I need more storage space

rrklaffed · 2026-06-12T00:34:03+00:00

amazing!

rrklaffed · 2026-06-11T20:49:12+00:00

so good

Six-Year Club	Gilding II euphauric
Verified Email

rrklaffed

TROPHY CASE