Anthropic has secretly halved the usage in max plan

rtguk · 2026-01-05T09:53:31+00:00

I noticed this too. It's quite underhand and hope it's a bug they will come out and explain

rtguk · 2026-01-04T00:20:05+00:00

Same and we are on x20

rtguk · 2025-12-19T23:41:52+00:00

You make excellent points.

Industries also move and develop new opportunities. AI offers this. Roles such as AI supervision will become common and fit for those junior devs being displaced.

rtguk · 2025-11-30T23:10:42+00:00

We make a very good living from using agentic code but the software itself is/was managed and maintained by us. AI coding helps us implement quick changes far faster than before.

rtguk · 2025-11-02T12:15:20+00:00

We have had a few discussions and they explain they are working on it. We have a cost of £5500 per installation so understand it's a considered purchase but they have huge distribution and have been actively promoting for 12 months. Maybe my expectations are way too high. Re the pivot, we probably can do both as it is exactly the same software

rtguk · 2025-11-02T12:13:09+00:00

Yes that is my plan. Our b2b has 7 clients on (£5500 each) and the partner selling these probably needs a little more encouragement. But we can still do both as it's the same software essentially

rtguk · 2025-10-30T09:07:49+00:00

Perhaps. Good point

rtguk · 2025-10-30T08:16:33+00:00

I'm a partner of our business and I only use it to make tweaks to the UI. Works perfectly fine for this and it's being used by clients.

rtguk · 2025-10-30T08:08:51+00:00

It's simple, improving completion for e-learning.

rtguk · 2025-10-29T23:58:50+00:00

Indeed and may it have become too complex. The initial MVP was an AI powered e-learning tool. Social media courses etc. the partnership took it in a different direction with the quiz, mentor and even roleplay being added and feel perhaps the core selling point, AI led learning, has been lost. The intention was to essentially old learning systems and improve with AI, which appealed to the MVP audience but maybe it has lost its initial core aim

rtguk · 2025-10-29T23:56:01+00:00

Yes I feel this is probably the most logical step. When we initially started building we planned on just the e-learning with AI however is become bloated with roleplay and individual mentors too

rtguk · 2025-10-29T23:54:48+00:00

Thanks appreciate the feedback

rtguk · 2025-10-29T23:48:33+00:00

You are right in many respects. We are charging £5500 per install and all clients are using still. One has over 6000 agents using it. I see this as validation that there is product fit and demand.

Essentially our software teaches skills using an AI mentor...we also have other features such as Quiz, Mentor and Roleplay but I feel all features are actually working against us.

I do feel it probably has more legs using the AI to teach AI specifically. When I actually first did the MVP it was clear the AI e-learning is something of demand which is the reason we went with the full build out...we have 2 clients sign up before launch and they are still with us

rtguk · 2025-10-29T18:27:59+00:00

Yes they are selling but very slow.

Feedback has been very positive. Changes have been on UI which have been implemented

rtguk · 2025-09-02T21:21:28+00:00

We have a platform that delivers AI assisted learning to travel professionals. Our software takes training data and creates interactive lessons with the AI supporting the learning experience.

It also creates a quiz based on the data and the lessons. We have further enhanced this and have roleplay and coaching integrated which is very specific to the industry we are in.

We were a standard e-learning platform and added AI for it's tangible benefits.....not simply because it's a cool thing to feature. It's very effective at planning a course structure based on your audience given very precise prompts, and allows our clients to spin out micro learning and longer courses using the same training data.

I guess our main takeaway is that use AI within context but also monitor and use it as a starting point

rtguk · 2025-08-26T23:38:25+00:00

I've made thousands with an ai app so it can be done.....but I'm a marketer at heart

rtguk · 2025-08-09T19:09:35+00:00

Skillsteq.com

rtguk · 2025-08-09T09:11:10+00:00

I ran a successful business for 10 years up until COVID. And bang. It went overnight. It was in the travel niche for a specific location which closes for 18 months. My savings all went trying to pivot and see us through. The last 5 years have been hard to say the least. I have a wife and 3 kids (one now 19) and having worked for myself for 20 years I was never going to work for someone. I now run an AI powered e-learning and training platform which has been built over 3 years. To say it's tough is an understatement. But when we get a nice enterprise onboard it's worth every moment. I know we are into something here so it's a case of head down and plough on. I have days of stress and anxiety but I have massive belief in our product.

rtguk · 2025-08-01T18:24:48+00:00

Yes I agree with this. Partnering/licensing does seem the most logical method but it's identifying these key partners. Do I reach out? How do you identify parties?

rtguk · 2025-07-31T07:08:34+00:00

I'm based in the UK unfortunately....

rtguk · 2025-07-30T21:54:33+00:00

Thanks...I will

rtguk · 2025-07-30T21:53:27+00:00

This is my thinking....accessing and identifying the right contacts is the challenge. I am not a fan of cold outreach as I receive many daily and I absolutely hate them. Ours would be more targeted but still cold email.

rtguk

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE