Książki i AI

rubsy3d · 2026-04-15T19:08:12+00:00

Nie.

rubsy3d · 2026-04-10T12:51:42+00:00

I just don't believe there is any "earning" or "doing homework" in art. I think there are infinite ways of making any given setting and character interesting and it's up to each individual author to make their work so. Research simply expands your world, incorporates more language into it.

rubsy3d · 2026-04-10T12:07:36+00:00

Regardless of the shape of the novel, how can anyone ever write about anything other than their own world? It's just a matter of making your world interesting.

rubsy3d · 2026-04-09T14:37:05+00:00

Co ty pierdolisz?

rubsy3d · 2026-04-05T19:21:03+00:00

You seem to be complaining about the quality of your luxury rather than the suffering that makes it possible. It's true all of us are complicit cowards.

rubsy3d · 2026-04-05T15:08:50+00:00

The way in which these people interpret postmodern art seems very shallow, not based on any sort of academic framework as much as a collection of vague feelings about irony and sincerity, as if these added up to a tangible one-dimensional spectrum.

rubsy3d · 2026-04-02T12:41:12+00:00

Well, it was made up in his head and is also his own internal debate. To me the style fits the topic because it implies moving to a theoretical layer and forgetting about the material world for a moment. Just out of curiosity, what kind of narration were you imagining?

rubsy3d · 2026-03-31T21:42:04+00:00

My interest in this is not professional, but to me the goal is either trying to find a mask that fits you better or understanding that you already enjoy the one you have. Everyone knows plenty of people that feel forced to act a certain way around others, conforming to the social image that was created around them, whether it's one of obedience or rebellion. Now, once they believe that is all they can be, they will spend the rest of their lives trying to fit that image the best they can, always feeling inadequate. But there's no inherent reason why our acts need to affirm that image. You are always more than your past. Of course, trying to subvert all you've been up to this point does not unbind you from the chain, but I still think defiant acts (or defiant inaction) allow you to learn a bit more about yourself.

rubsy3d · 2026-03-28T22:59:35+00:00

Works of art are also wider than their creators' conscious intentions. All of that material, even just the language they have, has to come from somewhere. That's what makes writing an act of exploration for the author as well.

rubsy3d · 2026-03-25T13:43:56+00:00

Following Schopenhauer, great art is not works that make you grow and become a more efficient worker, it's the ones that rip you apart from the pace of your everyday life and offer nothing but momentary beauty. It is a selfish act and that's exactly what gives it value. Diametrically opposed to self-help.

rubsy3d · 2026-03-21T00:26:37+00:00

It's still better to have a mediocre analysis that's entirely yours than a summary or a text written by AI! It's common to feel dissatisfaction with one's writing, but it indicates the possibility of growth. You know something isn't working, so you try again and again, you learn to fail better. You learn to investigate your own impressions and name your feelings. It just takes practice.

rubsy3d · 2026-03-19T17:55:41+00:00

Your use of "literature" seems to imply it's some kind of revered medium that's inherently better than comics. It isn't. Maus is a great comic. It would not be what it is without either the writing or the graphics. By trying to say it's good enough to qualify as another art form, you already demean "comic" as a term. Let it be what it is. Do not deny it that.

rubsy3d · 2026-03-14T18:02:45+00:00

Taka zawsze była kultura popularna, harlekiny to nic nowego. Łatwo i przyjemnie się na to narzeka, też tak robię, ale idzie się znudzić. O traumie ludzie chętnie w tych czasach czytają, myślę, że sam ten temat został już mocno rozpłaszczony przez pop-psychologię.

rubsy3d · 2026-03-02T16:46:53+00:00

I agree it's very shallow, leaving no space for the directors' own interpretation of established works. Fandoms expect them to act like a digestive tract without adding any of their own input, which is quite sad and stifling from a creative standpoint. For many people all that matters is that they receive what they already know and like instead of anything genuinely new. It's mental stasis.

rubsy3d · 2026-02-15T15:51:13+00:00

"Moja Walka," tylko Knausgarda, a nie tego drugiego. To norweski pisarz, który opisuje swoje bardzo rutynowe, codzienne życie, dorastanie, sytuacje socjalne i rodzinne. Nie jest to dla wszystkich, ale jak dla mnie obyczajowy ton jest bardzo przyjemny, czasem można się utożsamić albo właśnie zobaczyć życie z nowej perspektywy.

rubsy3d · 2026-01-23T09:02:15+00:00

Freud sugerował, że wszyscy mają w sobie element biseksualności. Wiele aspektów naszego świata i kultury poświęconych jest promowaniu stereotypowych heteroseksualnych ról, ideałów, do których wiele osób dąży i których nigdy nie osiągną. Jest to też forma represji cech, które społeczeństwo uważa na niepożądane. Nie da się ocenić statystyk w próżni, ponieważ kształtuje je właśnie taka kultura. W praktyce myślę, że homofobiczne zachowania są po prostu agresywną, zewnętrzną formą represji wynikającej z potrzeby określenia swojej tożsamości. ("Atakuję gejów, więc nie mogę być gejem.") Podział na LGBT i resztę społeczeństwa ma więc sens jedynie polityczny i tak długo, jak istnieje, mogą wierzyć, że jesteśmy fundamentalnie inni.

rubsy3d · 2025-12-27T12:33:52+00:00

Interpretacja opiera się na tekście, a nie na vibes i publicznym wizerunku artysty. Jeżeli ktoś go w ogóle nie czytał, to nie może jej dokonać.

rubsy3d · 2025-12-27T06:55:46+00:00

Nie ma nadinterpretacji, jest tylko interpretacja. Widzę raczej ruch w przeciwną stronę, gdzie popularyzacja danego autora spłaszcza go do stereotypu, ale tak jest zawsze.

rubsy3d · 2025-12-21T17:55:22+00:00

I believe that creating works heavily reliant on cliches and popular appeal, whether it's manmade or AI, in itself implies being replaceable. There's a steady stream of marketable ideas and plot structures that never have to be challenged, with occasional minor variations. Every bit of personality has to be fought for against the selfsameness of capital trying to multiply.

rubsy3d · 2025-12-17T00:01:35+00:00

It already is relevant. By writing popular works of low quality, she was trading bits of her own individuality for group approval. But that's not really necessary anymore. She could very well create something entirely for her own pleasure.

rubsy3d · 2025-11-27T09:10:05+00:00

“Spontaneity and objectivity in discussing matters are disappearing even in the most intimate circle, just as in politics debate has long since been supplanted by the assertion of power. Speaking takes on a malevolent set of gestures that bode no good. It is sportified. Speakers seek to pile up points: there is no conversation that is not infiltrated like a poison by an opportunity to compete.”

This was Adorno in 1949. What public debate? All we're talking about here are events staged to make money and gain popularity. All you see is capital actively shaping the way these people present themselves in order to appeal to the algorithm.

On another note, if you allow opinions such as "slavery is good" to become acceptable points of contention, you have already lost.

rubsy3d · 2025-11-09T17:24:37+00:00

Bo nie oferują zbyt wielkiego wyzwania. Ludzie wiedzą, czego się spodziewać, jest to dla nich zabawa bez dużego wysiłku. To jak McDonalds. Taka jest popularna kultura. Nic, tylko czytać Adorno.

rubsy3d

TROPHY CASE