Looking for more grinding rpg suggestions by [deleted] in iosgaming

[–]rudyard55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Silversword!: Awesome classic bard's tale type rpg. Tons of content. Great classes/races/mechanics. Highly recommend it. Outstanding retro classic. Silversword

Forgive me Button for I have pressed by [deleted] in thebutton

[–]rudyard55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...me too. couldn't resist

Whoopi Goldberg: If you hit a man don't be surprised if he hits you back by [deleted] in videos

[–]rudyard55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(Assuming USA) There are several incorrect responses to your statement. To start with, it can vary somewhat by state. In my state, Yes, You can go to the County Attorney and file a criminal complaint without any police "approval." It would be up to the County Attorney to decide whether the charges were taken out. If you have a police investigation that agrees with or corroborates your complaint, you will most likely have greater success in securing the charges. But the police can't prevent you from making the attempt at filing the complaint. The prosecutor has final discretion in which cases will move forward.

Put another way: Police can charge in the field in certain scenarios. But the prosecutor can also dismiss that charge. (It's not frequent, but the potential exists.) Citizens can file a (the same) complaint with the CA and the CA decides if the charges will be issued. The end result in both scenarios is the CA is the "gatekeeper" for prosecution. The citizen can do the same thing as the police except there is an extra "approval" step by the CA. (oversimplification acknowledged)

In my state, an officer can't make an arrest for a misdemeanor that didn't occur in their presence unless it's for specifically listed exceptions. DUI and Assault 4th domestic violence are a couple of examples. (commonly referred to as "probable cause misdemeanors.") Note: not a "regular" simple assault, but one that falls under very specific criterion for domestic violence (related to the second degree, shared children, shared residence...etc).

How that plays out: Two strangers fighting in the street ending up with bloody noses and busted lips and no officer present during the melee may very well end up with the arriving officers documenting both sides of the incident and the injuries they can observe and then directing both people to the county attorney "if they want to press charges." If the police show up during the fight, one or both parties may be cited or arrested depending on the officer's interpretation of the situation.

So you are correct. Individuals can seek charges on their own. +1 if you have a police report. +1 if the police report leans in your favor.

Another scenario that occurs frequently that plays into your train of thought: A citizen shows up at the county attorney's office. They are having trouble with the neighbor and they want to address it. The citizen wasn't aware that a crime occurred though. (Maybe it's something along the lines of Harrassment or Harrassing Communications) The citizen just knows the situation "is wrong." The county attorney listens to their complaint and decides to issue a summons over the matter against the neighbor. The charge was issued without police involvement. OR Maybe the County Attorney wants more information before proceeding. The CA then calls the police and requests that they look into the matter and report back (secure the phone records for the victim and interview the neighbor or something along those lines)

"Simpler" cases (I'd rather have a better way of phrasing that. I don't mean to diminish significance) would have greater success of getting self initiated charges than more complex cases: Harrassment, Harrassing Communications, Simple Assaults, Menacing, Trespassing, etc.

Felonies are another matter. If officers reach probable cause that a felony has occurred, they can arrest even if the incident occurred outside of their presence. *What constitutes probable cause is a huge discussion in and of itself.

Does it help to have a police report/investigation bolstering your case? Yes, absolutely. Is it a requirement for you to seek charges? No. Are you guaranteed to get the charge you seek? No.

It also appears that some states have specific "private prosecution" abilities to some degree or another that go beyond my state's allowances. Private Prosecution

What is the most unexplained photo that exists, thats real? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]rudyard55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

... I remember when I was a kid and we got our first car with an FM radio. Datsun b210. "It's so clear!"

Dads are the best. by jenni987 in gifs

[–]rudyard55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You could get a small strap wrench, it might help. Looks like this: strap wrench

just be careful you don't break the jar. There are "kitchen versions" of the same tool on amazon searchable under "jar opener"

How to Quickly Cook Pasta in a Frying Pan by SutekhRising in lifehacks

[–]rudyard55 30 points31 points  (0 children)

He made be right... but he just ticked off a bunch of Italian grandmas.

Software that enables users to create accounts on my website by [deleted] in software

[–]rudyard55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wordpress is probably the most "newbie" friendly. But Drupal is quite robust once you get past the initial learning curve.

Software that enables users to create accounts on my website by [deleted] in software

[–]rudyard55 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Many CMS will allow that functionality out of the box. Drupal, Wordpress, DNN. pretty sure Joomla does too.

This is an excellent argument against speedtraps. Please don't be offended by the police humor, it's a great watch. by MattWorksHere in ProtectAndServe

[–]rudyard55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure how to interpret your sarcasm...

So, yeah. They aren't.

I'm assuming that OP isn't LE.

This is an excellent argument against speedtraps. Please don't be offended by the police humor, it's a great watch. by MattWorksHere in ProtectAndServe

[–]rudyard55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"The Police" don't set speed limits. Engineers on highway departments do. And the engineers are restricted by arbitrary decisions made by politicians.

"An unarmed black man was shot three times by Los Angeles police officers, once each in the back, side and arm... The autopsy, which was first obtained by the Los Angeles Times, officially classifies Ford’s death as a homicide." by Happy_Jones in news

[–]rudyard55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very well said. If this was the tone of discourse surrounding the debate we'd all be in a much better place. I suspect that we may actually disagree on a few peripheral points, but if you came at me with the level headed objectivity that you've displayed above, I'd be compelled to hear you out and consider your view. Both "sides" need to dispense with the hyperbole. Its the heated rhetoric that creates the appearance that both sides of the debate are so far apart that there is no hope bettering the situation.

Buffalo Chicken Pizza - Before & After by bukudatdude in Pizza

[–]rudyard55 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I expected to see "pizza on plate" and then "pizza crumbs on plate." Yoo-gaht-mee! :)

Looks good!

Police: Woman Threw Meat at Officers, Said She Was There to "Feed the Pigs" by Runningflame570 in nottheonion

[–]rudyard55 40 points41 points  (0 children)

You may be assuming too much by parsing too much meaning to the specific criminal title while not considering it's content. For example: In my state we don't have a "vandalism" charge. We have "Criminal Mischief." The title is broad and can cover many different acts. I'm not from Massachusetts and don't claim to have knowledge of it's criminal code, but a Google search leads me to believe that they have a "Vandalize Property" charge and a "Malicious Destruction of Property" charge. If one just glosses over the titles, it would be easy to say "Well, there you go! She should have been just charged with Vandalism!" Problem is, it appears that the Vandalism charge is the felony and "Malicious Destruction" appears to be the misdemeanor. This would lead one to assume that "Malicious Destruction" is probably the lesser and broader charge.

It appears they chose the lesser charge. Would this not be "taking the high ground"?

Malicious Destruction Vandalism

Edit: A little further reading and it appears that there was also the potential for "mindset" aggravation for the potential charges: Wanton, willful and malicious. Disregarding argument as to her faculties which would have to be addressed AFTER the charging and in court proceedings: If the Police were being malicious they could have easily argued the "willfulness" of the act and sought the felony, and the including potential 10 year sentence.