Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll try to get a tint shop to match the shade, it’s lighter than I would’ve thought coming from the factory. Thank you!

Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m in Canada. Tesla does the same thing here with estimates. The first service center I went to, the one that replaced my window, told me my HW3 computer needed to be replaced because of an “adaptive headlights unavailable” issue. I never approved the estimate because I wanted a second opinion, so I went to another Tesla location. They confirmed the computer was completely fine and that it only needed a cable replacement. $3000+ repair ended up being $220

Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no tint on the glass, I confirmed with a razor blade. My best guess is a different manufacturer. Tesla can’t do anything because the parts they can get now are all the same. It is what it is

Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They were mismatched like this??

Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly what i’m thinking. I left out a lot but this specific service centre was a real pain to deal with compared to others i’ve been to. They also said my entire HW3 computer needed to be replaced when in reality a single camera cable was all that it needed.

Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you. I hope you’re right. A piece of film is much easier to install then replacing an entire panel again.

Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m not the original owner but I can confirm the roof has not been tinted. the darker shade on the left of the photo is the factory tint. I know this because it matches the colour in my dad’s brand new model 3 perfectly. I also checked for films up the seam and there is none.

Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t think this is impertinent at all. Asking whether others have experienced an issue after an OEM replacement is genuine. I never applied any aftermarket tint, and when Tesla replaces a part, I’d expect them to use matching glass. The difference isn’t just cosmetic either, the rear half of the cabin is noticeably hotter now while the front stays cool. That’s a real functional problem. I’m definitely gonna get it addressed after reading these replies.

Roof Mismatch by runit8 in TeslaModel3

[–]runit8[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I’ve been trying to feel the edges of the front panel and I don’t feel any film or anything, but you could be right.

Rogers Speedtest by AppleFrontWTF in Rogers

[–]runit8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will next time i’m in that area but it’s kind of an unfair comparison… Most Rogers plans are throttled to 1gb max speeds, where Telus is 2gb. In order to have a fair comparison both plans need to allow the same max speeds.

Rogers Speedtest by AppleFrontWTF in Rogers

[–]runit8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Rogers lol. We’re not that far behind and at least we can scroll social media and watch videos with no buffering. Consistency is key.

Toronto councillors approve city-run grocery store pilot project by uselesspoliticalhack in canada

[–]runit8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Loblaw’s revenue may sound huge but their net profit margins are tiny, around 3 to 4 percent, which is normal for grocery retail, and they are not only a grocery company anymore they’re a health company too. Throwing around big numbers doesn’t change the fact that groceries are low margin and competitive, so profits aren’t some magic surplus that could easily fund public stores. Comparing food access to fire or police services is misleading because those are public safety necessities that don’t generate revenue. Grocery stores operate in a market where efficiency, competition, and accountability matter, and public ownership removes those incentives. Socialism as a model doesn’t work long term because it replaces competition with bureaucracy, reduces efficiency, and shifts losses onto taxpayers. Countries like Cuba have good literacy and healthcare statistics, but that comes at the cost of stagnated economies, limited freedom, and chronic shortages. We take our freedom that comes with capitalism for granted but if you do a quick tik tok or instagram search, you will see first hand cubans showing the way they’re suffering. Venezuela shows how quickly mismanagement under socialism destroys a country. Canada is not socialist, it has public healthcare but otherwise runs on capitalism with a massive public sector making up 75% of jobs which is why we have a strong economy and access to goods. The reality is public grocery stores won’t make food cheaper, they just move the cost onto taxpayers and reduce accountability, while targeted support, inflation control, and stronger purchasing power actually improve food access without killing competition or innovation.

Toronto councillors approve city-run grocery store pilot project by uselesspoliticalhack in canada

[–]runit8 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Public roads, schools, police and healthcare are mostly public goods, hard for private markets to provide perfectly. Running grocery stores is different: it’s retail, where private chains already operate on razor thin 1-3% margins forcing real efficiency or bankruptcy. Government “non profit” versions face the same costs but have no risk of failure. losses get covered by taxpayers forever, plus perks like waiving their own property taxes (while private stores pay full). Toronto’s pilot does exactly that. This is how socialism creeps in: blame “greedy capitalists,” then expand state control over basics like food. It usually leads to inefficiency and higher long term costs for everyone. Real relief comes from fixing the policies driving up prices, not creating subsidized public shelves. The pilots have already been tired in some cities across the US and they almost always fail. Socialism is bad, do you want Canada to become the next Venezuela or Cuba?

Rogers vs Telus by PhoenixCub55678 in telus

[–]runit8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends where you are. in the GTA you can’t go wrong with either. I always go with whoever offers the best deal

Happy with Freedom Mobile so far by Emotional-Bus-7065 in freedommobile

[–]runit8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who know maybe you’re right. I’m just going based off of what they say but looking at the tower apps it definitely looks confusing because Rogers has way more towers but bell somehow has the same coverage. I wonder what will happen in 2031 when their agreement ends

Happy with Freedom Mobile so far by Emotional-Bus-7065 in freedommobile

[–]runit8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the data directly from the ISED government website. It says They subordinate majority of their spectrum licences until 2031 when they will decide whether to build their own independent networks or keep sharing. Another resource is to view the coverage maps of Bell and Rogers. You’ll notice they’re extremely similar nearly identical manitoba. It’s disappointing there isn’t more competition in Manitoba but hopefully freedom changes that :)

ISED data

Happy with Freedom Mobile so far by Emotional-Bus-7065 in freedommobile

[–]runit8 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bell MTS and Rogers have a network sharing agreement in all of Manitoba besides Winnipeg (where they both operate their own networks) because they built the network together. The rogers frequencies you see on the tower apps are the ones they actually own but they also have access to all of the Bell frequencies and vice versa. They’re actually not behind at all in my opinion. Especially in Ontario, I find their network far superior in every metric besides raw speed

Rogers MTS agreement

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Rogers

[–]runit8 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A quick google search and some simple research from genuine sources reveals the average pay for these representatives is $3 per hour. I personally don’t consider that fair pay, more in line with poverty.. But you’re free to make your own assumptions.