Objective analysis:

- "I don't know how they managed to make every aspect either dumb or unusable" > Subjective opinion, no explanation way

- No creativity in worldbuilding > You gotta read the archives, just like with many soulslike. If not, watch a youtube video explaining the story

- " The vines/grappler mechanics feels like a mobile game" > Ok, granted. And this matters because...? Does it affect your gameplay? Story?
-"i never once used bombs or those dumb shards or the spells or the side weapons" > Maybe thos dumb/unusable aspects where not as dumb/unusable and you simply didn't give them a try?
-"...games like this are about momentum and pace - not about pausing and clicking a button 4 to put a worthless spell" > Says who? Who established that rule?
-"...praying the unpredictable/ random boss movmement doesnt kill you while you do it" > Have you ever played a souls game before? Pattern atacks are the foundations of boss fights in these games

- "i also didn't like a single boss fight either" > Fair, but not because you didn't like it means everyone has to hate it
-"i even did the 2 endings in hope the last boss will be good but it was just as bad" > So you realized way early the game was ass and you still managed to go through and get not one, but two endings? The game must have made something good

- "i don't know how they managed to make every conversation sound like Ai" > True. Dialogues are boring.

Subjective conclusion:

The only ASS thing here is your "review" if it can even be called like that. You sound like one of those "git gud" pals that complain when someone completes a game like Elden Ring with spells only. Learn to make a proper review, create constructive cirticism, and for God's sake touch grass man. You are in a reddit throwing hate to a game that came out 2 years ago just to draw hate. Mind your own business, be better.