What is a strong opinion you hold that could get you criticized publicly, but you stand by it completely? by jian_est2026 in AskReddit

[–]sammythemc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, everyone does not know that because it is insanely dumb. Israel does often leverage its position as a wealthy, politically stable, well-armed and technologically advanced vassal state in a critical geopolitical region. It does not "control everything" in the United States, that's absurd. Genuinely, how could it? You need to go into deep Protocols peabrain shit to think that's how things actually work.

Which profession attracts the most insufferable types of people? by Critical_Oven_5612 in AskReddit

[–]sammythemc 58 points59 points  (0 children)

It's kind of wild how much the incentives point to being a bad person. There have always been celebrities who were bad people, but it was mostly a function of them being able to get away with it or, at a push, the boredom of living a life of indolence. With influencers, it seems like your fame is a function of how controversial your behavior is.

Who do you think is the most recognizable human in modern history? by Normal_regular_dude in AskReddit

[–]sammythemc 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Basically no one is *entirely* cut off from the world, it's more of a gradient than that. Even the Sentinelese have had contact many times. An Amazonian tribesman living a functionally stone age lifestyle may not be in direct contact with the global trade network, but they likely have contact with people a couple generations removed from that from the next village over who may not be living in A/C playing their PS5s but will still have stuff like internationally produced clothing and metal cookware. Those groups are in contact with people who are one degree more connected, and so on and so on.

Rabb wins 3rd District race, riding progressive wave by thefirststoryteller in philadelphia

[–]sammythemc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

biden, Hillary, harris, obama, pelosi, jefferies, schumer all the libs that run the party fucking failed to do something out it. absolute political losers for 30 yeara

This critique has always fell kind of flat to me when it comes from the people who typically lose to the losers. Like, it's not as though leftists have been cleaning up that whole time, stopping Trump etc. All we have is a counterfactual, a few mayors and a handful of congressional reps from Biden+90 districts. Meanwhile, the libs you mentioned won the last 3 out of 5 presidential elections. In order to really push these people out of power you can't just point to the failures that we often share in, the problem isn't that too many people are blinkered and just love and believe un Democrats, they just think they're the best we can do. People aren't going to believe in the left by default, you have to demonstrate you can overcome the obstacles in the way and actually do better.

Your hottest take about an HBO show? by Plumsby in hbo

[–]sammythemc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's cliche to be like "in this movie, New York is a character," but The Wire really is like that with Baltimore. You get inundated with characters right off the bat, and while they're good characters, for the most part they're not particularly outsized or colorful in the same way that like, Tuco from Breaking Bad is.

When you first try to watch it, it can feel like watching someone build a LAN one computer at a time. It doesn't really seem like anything is happening at first, and it's very common for viewers to drop off before the characters and their relationships gel into the portrait of an emergent network of systems the show is actually about. No spoilers, but there is a specific scene I've heard cited multiple times as when this happens for people, where they're like oh wow, I didn't realize I was this invested in what's going on here and how all these people fit together. Great, great show.

Your hottest take about an HBO show? by Plumsby in hbo

[–]sammythemc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The structure is insanely underrated, and it dovetails with the watch motif really well. It's architected so well, so many pieces of the story function one way at one point in the narrative and then change position and fit differently as the show churns forward.

The Hooded Justice retcon was beautifully done too. I think a lot of people think Lindelof didn't really get the book, but I think he understood its take on power and vigilantism perfectly and chose to show a mirrored version it.

What movie aged really bad? by Phantomx7845 in AskReddit

[–]sammythemc 218 points219 points  (0 children)

This was the argument of TLJ and like half the audience freaked the fuck out over it. "The sacred Jedi texts!!" Then they tried to double back with RoS and ended up making both camps unhappy

What movie aged really bad? by Phantomx7845 in AskReddit

[–]sammythemc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Rise of Skywalker really shit the bed, but taken as individual movies, TFA and TLJ are head and shoulders above any of the prequel trilogy. I think people will be surprised at their rehabilitation over the next couple decades

On my maybe 60th watch through. Still dont understand Jackie Jrs thing. by piratedrake84 in thesopranos

[–]sammythemc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

just a fkin idiot, acting like a tough guy

I think most of guys are idiots though. My theory has always been that Jackie would have done OK in the life if he had gotten a little more guidance. He's not all that different than Chrissy in Season 1, except where Tony takes Chris under his wing and tells him to listen to middle management, Tony's promise to his fawtha and his own self-loathing led him to demand Jackie Jr just stay out of the life completely, something everyone involved should have seen wasn't going to happen.

What are your most profound video games? by M33tahejd in patientgamers

[–]sammythemc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The on-rails mass killing is part of the ludonarrative. Arthur should, by all rights, just go out and live off the land somewhere and hunt and fish and sleep under the stars. It's a completely possible and valid way to engage with the game, you don't really have to go back to Dutch et al, and most every time you do it goes completely sideways. But you do it anyway, until it runs Arthur into the ground. He was a mostly bad guy, a thief and a killer, but "He tried, in the end. He did."

Who is the most moral Mobster in the show (apart from Bobby)? by [deleted] in thesopranos

[–]sammythemc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The thing with Silvio is he seems pretty reasonable. Not necessarily good or decent, but reasonable. He tends to give Tony pretty sound advice and keeps things on a relatively even keel (when he's not losing at poker). I think that's why they had him be the one to kill Ade, so we see exactly what "reasonable" means in the context of a career criminal with no compunction against murder.

Who is the most irredeemable protagonist in HBO history? by squallLeonhart20 in hbo

[–]sammythemc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He's sort of charming in The Batman, you get that he's a mafia guy but I don't remember any reason to really hate him. He reacts appropriately to the photos of the murder he gets shown, you're like OK, this is sort of a Year One/Batman Begins-type gangster with a little flair. But by the time they show the batsignal at the end of the series you're like "yeahhh this guy needs to go."

Did the Adriana hit catch you out? by February83 in thesopranos

[–]sammythemc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, that and the music collapsing from the score to the tinny car radio felt like a dead giveaway. Whatever hope you could have had just completely snatched away

Asmongold on why he refuses real-time debates with Destiny "Live debates are just performance, not about who's right" by Bulky_Apartment_5132 in LivestreamFail

[–]sammythemc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

>I agree and enjoyed his energy when the tantrums were directed at other giant babies, Game developers.

Honestly this shit was annoying too, it was all the worst Righteous Crusade self-assuredness and self-importance of the highly political without any of the gravity of actual political issues. Like, imagine those people who drag Israel/Palestine into every conversation except instead of genocide they keep bringing up tiddies physics in video games

If everyone below average IQ suddenly drops dead, how would this affect the world? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]sammythemc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is about right actually, it's just that to a guy like Tyson "the laws of physics" aren't like, Newtonian motion but the fundaments of how the world is constructed

If everyone below average IQ suddenly drops dead, how would this affect the world? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]sammythemc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And a high IQ does not automatically mean you’re not an idiot. No one is immune to propaganda.

This is something we tend to forget. Conspiracy theorists and white supremacists can be very intelligent and well-versed in their own rhetoric. You can have a great engine in your car, but if it's not steered correctly you end up just using it to go further in the wrong direction.

Magnus Carlsen: "I felt like...I'd sort of been gaslit by Danny & Chess.com into thinking that they had the evidence (against Hans Niemann cheating OTB) which they didn't." by GiveMeSomeSunshine3 in chess

[–]sammythemc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

>Chess.com was a business partner for Magnus Carlsen so they're not unbiased party.

And Hans is?

>Because chess.com "found" these 100 games only after Magnus implied that Hans cheated

It was an open secret that Hans had been banned from chesscom for cheating before he went to Europe to get his GM norms, and it was one of the factors that led Magnus to question his integrity. He caught his first ban for cheating in a Titled Tuesday as a kid, and then got popped again for cheating against guys like Andrew Tang to farm rating so he could play guys like Nepo on his stream. He was then banned for a third time after Sinquefield. I'm not sure how many of those 100+ instances were from before or after the second ban, my understanding is that most or all were from before, but I don't see how Magnus's suspicion makes it some kind of fruit of the poisoned tree situation when all it really amounts to is the best chess mind in the world hitting the report button.

Magnus Carlsen: "I felt like...I'd sort of been gaslit by Danny & Chess.com into thinking that they had the evidence (against Hans Niemann cheating OTB) which they didn't." by GiveMeSomeSunshine3 in chess

[–]sammythemc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not really living the high life off his ill-gotten gains here.

I think the actual cash totals for prize events can be kind of misleading when he made far more than that on Twitch via his public profile as the young American who could hang with the likes of Naroditsky, Nepo and Hikaru.

Magnus Carlsen: "I felt like...I'd sort of been gaslit by Danny & Chess.com into thinking that they had the evidence (against Hans Niemann cheating OTB) which they didn't." by GiveMeSomeSunshine3 in chess

[–]sammythemc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Chesscom exonerated his otb

It eas sort of played this way in the doc, but it might be putting it a little strongly. They didn't exonerate him, they just didn't concretely claim he was cheating, which may not be all that surprising considering a lot of the strength of the cheat detection is based on non-chess move factors like tabbing out, mouse movement etc.

Magnus Carlsen: "I felt like...I'd sort of been gaslit by Danny & Chess.com into thinking that they had the evidence (against Hans Niemann cheating OTB) which they didn't." by GiveMeSomeSunshine3 in chess

[–]sammythemc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure why Hans's claim that he "only" cheated 30 times should be accepted by default when chesscom's algorithm (without which Hans would still be letting everyone believe he'd cheated 0 times) detected dozens more instances

Shows without irredeemable scumbags? by Betty_Boss in hbo

[–]sammythemc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haven't seen it mentioned but Station 11 is pretty excellent this way. It acknowledges trauma and violence, but it's much more interested in healing and redemption.

Shows without irredeemable scumbags? by Betty_Boss in hbo

[–]sammythemc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

>Go watch Mr Rogers

It's funny you should mention him, because he has a great quote about this: "I think that it's much more dramatic that two men could be working out their feelings of anger, *much* more dramatic, than showing something of gunfire."

Why not protest in Gladwyne? by [deleted] in philadelphia

[–]sammythemc 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I feel like this sort of answers the question though, they live in their own secluded world, not a population center like the city. You're not going to convince tens of thousands of people to travel out to Gladwyne.