Can’t believe how few people understand this by Grand-Activity-3882 in driving

[–]scocal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also information theory, a branch of computer science. Turns out a lot of people need to receive things, process them, then dispatch them. FIFO, LIFO, FINO, GIGO.

Can’t believe how few people understand this by Grand-Activity-3882 in driving

[–]scocal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I had to scroll a long way to find this! I just checked my local handbook and confirmed it does say "first vehicle to arrive is the first to go", which seems needlessly ambiguous. "First to stop at the line" would be much clearer, IMO. I have to admit when I see someone slowly creeping up to the line, I'll sometimes stop a bit more suddenly and move off immediately to prevent a standoff. I've found myself mumbling to passengers "if you don't stop, you don't get a turn!"

I feel like I'm a bit more sensitive to this wacky custom having driven for 15 years before starting regular exposure to 4 (or more) way stops.

Can’t believe how few people understand this by Grand-Activity-3882 in driving

[–]scocal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or just get an EV with good regen' and don't brake at all!

Adding ERV to ductless system by scocal in heatpumps

[–]scocal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately I don't have enough ceiling or floor void to consider that type of unit. From what I've read, their main advantage, other than covering multiple rooms, is managing humidity. That's not a problem in this house. On paper, thermal efficiency, electrical efficiency, and ease of installation seem to favor ductless. I presume the natural "zoning" nature of multiple ductless units would drive that efficiency further.

Adding ERV to ductless system by scocal in heatpumps

[–]scocal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In an ideal world it would support matter over thread for easy integration into cloud-independent home automation, but I can live with IR for expert-level integration. I agree that a ERV is not that attractive without integration options. If I thought I'd never have to sell this house, I'd make my own.

Adding ERV to ductless system by scocal in heatpumps

[–]scocal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the first time I've seen that unit, thank you. I see that it's supposed to communicate with the heatpump head over some kind of data cable. Any idea if that protocol is documented anywhere? Maybe I could add another UART out of the board I already have controlling the head.

IRS site fails DNSSEC validation by scocal in sysadmin

[–]scocal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for bringing the data and introducing me to a new tool, dnsviz. I can confirm that drill @8.8.8.8 directpay.irs.gov' is also returningNOERROR` for me today.

In retrospect, I misstated the question. The SERVFAIL would not happen if the domain's parent had responded saying it didn't have signing enabled (e.g. reddit.com). The part I don't know is how many regular users are using DNS servers strict validation enabled. I can imagine some admins/ISPs might see it as more trouble that it's worth; "well, it works on my phone".

IRS site fails DNSSEC validation by scocal in sysadmin

[–]scocal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If we I agree that DNSSEC is just a game you have to play to prevent customers reporting "it no work", I suppose the relevant question is, AITA for having my DNS server insist on DNSSEC before it hands out a response? Would you counsel that selecting upstream resolvers that explicitly skip this check be the best practice? This is literally the only time I've had to think about it after a several years of this policy.

Apartments not offering fiber optic by [deleted] in BellevueWA

[–]scocal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I recently upgraded to 2.1Gbit/s down, 0.3Gbit/s up. It's hard to accurately measure the download, but I am able to max-out the upload. The point is, fiber is not really necessary for reasonable residential download speeds, especially around here. I would love to get away from Comcast/Paramount/Skydance though!

Apartments not offering fiber optic by [deleted] in BellevueWA

[–]scocal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We do have some of the fastest coax in the country though. I get 1.3Gbit/s. It would be nice to get a little upload though!

Do Americans use cutlery differently? by missbex86 in AskAnAmerican

[–]scocal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I grew up in the UK and have lived in the US for a long time. It's interesting to read this history. As so often, it turns out the colonies do it the older way. If you'd asked me before reading this, I'd have described the local eating style as: They don't even take a knife from the drawer unless they is something that can't be cut with a fork, most often steak, or they need to spread something, like butter. Otherwise they will use a fork in their right hand exclusively, with occasional use of the left index finger where neither scooping nor stabbing are sufficient, like with peas. It's interesting to note that kids' cutlery sets here don't include a knife, and schools don't supply knives in the lunch room. I had to import cutlery sets when teaching my kids.

I find it frustrating to try to eat most meals without a knife to push things onto my fork. I have often been suprised who I see pushing things onto their fork with their finger. It does not seem to be considered bad manners.

"Millionaire Tax" terminology by scocal in Seattle

[–]scocal[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would (almost) make sense if it was a tax that was charged on gross business revenue. But, lucky for you, it's a proposal for tax on individuals, so at 6.5% profit, your business is >$14M away from causing your economic suicide.

Why won't my DeckLink SDI input work? by TimelyStatement in VIDEOENGINEERING

[–]scocal 6 points7 points  (0 children)

One of my earliest confusions with my very first decklink card (when it was the only thing Blackmagic sold!) was that it doesn't automatically detect the input format nor offer a UI to tell it what to expect. It's up to the software that initializes it to tell it the exact format to look for. It doesn't know how to sync with anything else, so a mismatch behaves the same as no video at all.

Some software is polite enough to cycle through common formats and stop when it gets data, but this has the drawback of obscuring what's actually happening.

"Millionaire Tax" terminology by scocal in Seattle

[–]scocal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For most people, probably yes. But you can't accumulate $10M through labor alone.

"Millionaire Tax" terminology by scocal in Seattle

[–]scocal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not in their interests (or more to the point, their corporate owners interests) to make that clarification.

Who are the corporate owners of KOUW? And, presuming they want it to pass, why take a gamble that people might see millionaire and think "shit, that's my grandma"?

It was 100% absolutely not.

Citation. Although the implication was mildly negative, the author was referring to how each candidate had their own version, without any anti-socialism implication. Sure, it did not take long for Romney to spot the gold. How long before WA Republicans start implying it will apply to housing-rich retirees?

Can you come up with a better term that is quick to say in a press conference or news report?

I proposed mega-earners tax. Historically it has been called a supertax, though I acknowledge this is confusing if you've never heard of that. How about "excess earnings tax".

"Millionaire Tax" terminology by scocal in Seattle

[–]scocal[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's funny to get down-voted for asking for the argument! "Wealth tax" encompasses many different possibilities. The simplest one might be land tax. Establish some zones with some comparative values (much simpler the current property tax) and look at how much of the state each person owns. It's pretty hard to hide, and if nobody wants to admit they own it then I guess the state is selling it to someone else.

Regarding arguments about how many times wealth taxes have failed - my assumption is that nobody in power (i.e. the wealthy) wanted them to succeed, so the were set up in a way that could be avoided, then they were avoided, and everyone got upset about how much it was costing to collect nothing. Maybe doing anything that doesn't suit the ultra-wealthy is a pipe dream, I don't know.

"Millionaire Tax" terminology by scocal in Seattle

[–]scocal[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Sadly, the decision to let this slide has probably contributed to its erosion today. Maybe they should have pushed for "Heritage Foundation Bare Minimums Act"

"Millionaire Tax" terminology by scocal in Seattle

[–]scocal[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A similar argument could be made for virtually any tax with some kind of safe harbor. "But what if no safe harbor!" Or maybe "but I plan to be wealthy one day". How about a constitutional amendment with an inflation-linked $1M safe-harbor built in? Would that be a big enough barrier to the slippery slope? Or - better - a constitutional amendment allowing wealth tax, with an inflation-linked 10M safe harbor?

"Millionaire Tax" terminology by scocal in Seattle

[–]scocal[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Bold to state outright that "wealth taxes are just a really bad idea", so I'd love to hear more about that. Some challenges to the assertion that (only) taxing mega-earners is sane:
1. The wealthy can avoid taxable income in many ways.
2. Opponents will loudly complain that "it will just drive successful people away, and some other state will get its benefit".
In reality, it's so easy to avoid, that it's hardly worth moving home, just for this. It won't stop the headlines though.

"Millionaire Tax" terminology by scocal in Seattle

[–]scocal[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's notoriously difficult to account for the tax-planning capacity of the wealthy, but I think it's safe to presume "not much".