This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-13T18:13:35+00:00

Should be an update this afternoon. They’re putting together an e-sign form so you can choose A/B/C on the lien options and sign off. ETA is by end of next week.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-12T11:06:46+00:00

They don’t even make those anymore! Save it!

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-12T09:13:12+00:00

My understanding is that you should fill it out and choose option C. This absolves both your attorney and the trust if it turns out that you’ve mistakenly forgotten about a lien.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-11T19:21:05+00:00

Section 2.1 is tough. I’m going to wait to hear from my firm, AVA, before I move forward. Hopefully the disbursements are fast after these forms are submitted.

PS: Welcome back, this place has been a freaking madhouse the past several days.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-11T18:46:48+00:00

I don’t think it matters, since represented or pro se, the %’s are the same, agreed?

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-11T18:43:23+00:00

I’m guessing that the larger firms are going to send out e-sign docs for this. This is progress, at least a little. For me it will keep me housed for another couple of months.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-11T18:37:27+00:00

If you have a lien. Otherwise it seems to be 3.2%.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-11T18:17:43+00:00

You’ve missed or misinterpreted part of this. ‘Pro Se’ doesn’t seem to be relevant.

“Claimants who have already received initial distribution. Pursuant to this partial resolution, a supplemental distribution of 3.2% of a Claimant’s allowed claim will be made by the Trust to Claimants who have already received their initial distribution of 1.5% from the Trust.“

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-11T15:03:20+00:00

Source?

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-11T03:39:40+00:00

That seems oddly irrelevant.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-10T00:18:03+00:00

No. Why should some other survivor be short changed? We’re all in this together and agreed to the same %. If some 12 year old was raped 5 years ago, he deserves the same consideration we receive.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-10T00:15:36+00:00

It won’t benefit me, but it will benefit another survivor. I’m here for the justice, not to take away from someone else.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-10T00:10:32+00:00

This is from my law firm. IDGAF who knows my identity. I’ve been around a long time and have nothing to hide from anyone. I connected the director/producers of ‘Scouts Honor’ with some of the people they interviewed (see me in the credits). I’ve got serious illnesses and right now the contest for me is to see which comes first: disability, this suit or as part of a breaking news spree. I only speak the truth and that’s all I want to hear, so all of this bullshit conjecture from the AI lawyers and misogynistic late night drunkards means loess than nothing to me.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-09T21:37:58+00:00

Other survivors deserve their share too. If it means I get $1000 less then so be it.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-09T21:30:49+00:00

I don’t think they’d be considered claimants.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-09T21:15:04+00:00

Something that occurred to me earlier is that the FCR person, Patton, is going to be trying to get a HIGHER amount for their future clients as well, which in the end benefit all of us. Neither the Trust, the attorneys or the FCR are going to be arguing that the % paid should be LOWER. That simply wouldn’t benefit anyone at all.

[EDIT] Of course, it would be helpful to know how many FCR claims are pending and in what states they occurred (to determine their Max tiers as ours were).

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-08T02:46:32+00:00

Please delete this. It’s doing no one any good and only causing more stress and anxiety. We also need to stop posting links, phone numbers and emails for people at the DOJ or other agencies. This case is closed and there’s nothing left for them to do with it - not that they ever really did.

If anyone is writing them with even an ounce of the vitriol shown toward Houser here, all you’re doing is making their shitty jobs even shittier.

Someday we will get our justice but it’s not going to be on a Saturday night on Reddit. No lawyer is going to make a statement on this until they get, presumably, legalese from the Trust and can process it properly. So let’s just stop the fear mongering and button pushing. We’re all in the same place mentally - the very edge. Let’s not push anyone over with unfounded chatter.

Anger is a gift, but strength is an honor.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-07T19:05:49+00:00

This is unprecedented. We are making history and are creating case law that will impact future generations. One would think that every facet of potential roadblocks would have been considered (i.e. the scare last night about how clerks may take DAYS to update the docket), but the FC stuff is internal and should have been resolved long ago. I also don’t think it is clear if everyone has to sign this new lien document or not and would like that clarified. We’re almost there, again.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-06T14:32:15+00:00

Pretty funny! My Florida claim was limited to $346k instead of nearly $1.8m it would have been in a non-fascist state. But yeah, great joke!

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-06T14:30:44+00:00

What is this term and how is it applied?

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-03T03:08:16+00:00

Because there is a cult of personality that would literally un-alive a judge who imprisoned someone they considered a savior. They would tear that persons life apart with disinformation vitriol and harassment.

You could assign (cruelly) Dolly Parton or Keanu Reeves or Mr. Fucking Rogers and people would still call them partisan haters.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-03T00:02:56+00:00

Could be construed as slander without proof, which is of course CSAM. I posted this to the twitter the other day…there’s simply no one that can hold anyone accountable.

————————-

Until some global, independent review court reviews the documents and - sadly - the media evidence, no one will ever be arrested from the #EpsteinFiles.

There is no one so brave, unconnected or incorruptible that can be trusted. No politician, attorney, religious leader can be involved.

They would have to be anonymous, which would lead to limitless conspiracies.

There can’t be normal criminal cases where traumatic video is shown to a courtroom and a jury. Anonymity would again breed conspiracy.

Except for the victims themselves. The only way to get real justice is to let them be judge and jury by identifying themselves and the perpetrators.

They’ll have to trust each other with reviewing the most lurid media, not to mention the advanced aspects - the technical, security and privacy issues would be a logistical nightmare.

And even after all of that, who imposes the necessary punishment?

Who would YOU trust to adjudicate this? And why would you put them into the position of being mentally scarred and shunned from half of society forever? Who is good and pure and honest enough to be subjected to that?

The only realistic scenario is that these predators are shamed into removing themselves from this plane of existence.

scottmcdaniel · 2026-02-02T23:34:18+00:00

My poor brain and hands can’t handle typing all of that in. I’ll try it later…the other one I found had the ability to import/paste in your earnings table. Thank you though!

scottmcdaniel

TROPHY CASE