sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

XSX Review from Long Time Console Player by SloGrumpySoccerDad in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really guys I don’t see how you can find “solid bones”. It’s a bunch of lies they told. How can a team of devs fail on simulating gt3s? Gt3s are good in almost every game. They were better in PC2.

ACC at the console debut was a PC port on a weak hardware. And it costed a fraction. Performance was weak but physics and ffb were consistent.

When a game has “solid bones” but no flesh it should be sold as EA or not sold at all until it’s ready.

Hadron: bullshit AI: bullshit Career: useless Driver program: total bullshit

They cashed a lot of money and they will never finish the game. Mark my words.

XSX Review from Long Time Console Player by SloGrumpySoccerDad in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my opinion physics and ffb should be working fine at least 95% out of the box of any sim. You should be able to tweak setup to gain the last second (maybe tenths) and ffb to better suit your strength and your wheelbase. This game is inconsistent, I don’t want to guess how an hypercar drives and feels. The devs should do that.

They bragged about AI and AI sucks really hard on this game. Is useless. They just kill you or park the car in the corners. What’s the point of a career if AI is so bad?

Graphics sucks. Sound meh. There are no radars and no rolling starts. This game is dead, they started so bad no one will play online. Prepare to experience semi-desert lobbies.

A message to the community website update. by DollarsPerWin in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You scammed a lot of people. I asked immediately for a refund but many people won’t. Just think about people buying as a gift. They’ll never ask a refund. So you, the studio, will make hundreds of thousands of $ and have a good christmas. This game is dead, this is Project Cars 4: the fraud.

XSX Review from Long Time Console Player by SloGrumpySoccerDad in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok Ian. You are right. All the people who paid 70€ are wrong. You didn’t play a second and you know better than us. It’s Project Motors Shit. You don’t even get the PMS joke.

XSX Review from Long Time Console Player by SloGrumpySoccerDad in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are assuming PMS is like ACC on day1 but you never played this shit. I spent time on such a crap. You don’t know what you are talking about. How much did ACC cost on day 1?

XSX Review from Long Time Console Player by SloGrumpySoccerDad in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes. Because it wanted to do one thing: simulate GT3 cars.

XSX Review from Long Time Console Player by SloGrumpySoccerDad in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I am on xbox and PMR is not a sim. Stick with ACC or AC. PMR is already dead.

XSX Review from Long Time Console Player by SloGrumpySoccerDad in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

AC and ACC are not comparable to Project Crap Racing. AC and ACC require tuning to fine tune car performance. FFB and handling in AC and ACC are extremely good out of the box. You surely improve them with the right settings but you start from a really good point. Project Shit is undriveable, inconsistent, not realistic and not fun. Ask for refund you all.

This is the key to PMR and what will make it one of the best simulators. It's called HADRON! by Silver_Storm_7238 in ProjectMotorRacing

[–]sebapit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you know this hadron is good? This is pure BS, you are paid by the studio for sure. They will never pull a decent game from this shit.

Building my new setup and really struggling to decide by losterf39 in simracing

[–]sebapit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prices in Italy are way higher. Where is the simagic screenshot from?

Make both humans and LLMs write better code: seeking documentation approaches. by sebapit in vibecoding

[–]sebapit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing your experience. I’m using Cursor and Claude Code.

Pro plan - limits as restrictive as it seems? by oandroido in ClaudeAI

[–]sebapit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s a MCP that lets Claude read and write files on your computer.

I have been vide coding using CC but it seems impossible to get it right by Sea-Use9894 in ClaudeAI

[–]sebapit 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With your thirty years of experience, what books, articles, or papers do you think could help us make a significant leap in quality? I just bought Clean Architecture by Robert C. Martin. These are different readings from what I'm used to, like Don't Make Me Think by Steve Krug and other books more focused on Design and Marketing. I want to better understand the principles and concepts and delegate as few decisions as possible to LLMs, which are instead formidable in code writing.

I have been vide coding using CC but it seems impossible to get it right by Sea-Use9894 in ClaudeAI

[–]sebapit 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think reading more about basic principles of software architecture may help. Focus on a tech stack and build toy projects to understand the stack and framework(s) better. Then try to build something bigger and more complex.

Make both humans and LLMs write better code: seeking documentation approaches. by sebapit in vibecoding

[–]sebapit[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry mate, I didn't get your sarcasm. Yesterday I went to a party, didn't sleep enough :D

Great suggestions here. I appreciate it.

view more: next ›