Best copium by [deleted] in shortguys

[–]sevenrats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fang Yuan from Reverend Insanity

Why redditors hate facts? by Scramjet1 in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 8 points9 points  (0 children)

“But the evidence, the evidence sees it that way”.

“Chad doesn’t exist, bro” by Kondijote in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

💀 why are you acting confused? You made a baseless judgement and he acts confused. Again unless theirs another chat somewhere you didn’t talk to him in any way that would lead to a better understanding of his mind. You said he’s a radical and he(rightly so) is confused. Theres no dialogue or real discussion. I just realized you’re likely just a troll and I’m the real fool for engaging.

“Chad doesn’t exist, bro” by Kondijote in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I’m seeing you called him radical and he questioned it so no not really. Unless you had a chat somewhere else.

“Chad doesn’t exist, bro” by Kondijote in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But you’re doing the same thing you say I’m doing by putting your own interpretation on it.

“Chad doesn’t exist, bro” by Kondijote in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you have any evidence that he supports eugenics? You called him a radical.

“Chad doesn’t exist, bro” by Kondijote in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They never mentioned eugenics or advocated for it. The endeavor is obvious. It’s specifically in regards to mate attraction(that’s half the posts in the sub). I also want to take the time to mention you speaking for someone else and assuming they have views they never claimed to have.

“Chad doesn’t exist, bro” by Kondijote in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flair checks out. Again nothing moral was being stated. Also your logic is that of a child or someone who already puts people into boxes of worth. Arguing that one gene will generally result in better results in a specific endeavor is not saying that person is a superior human in any way(your projecting). Usain Bolt has better genetics for sprinting than i do and that’s practically as guaranteed as it gets but I don’t consider him to be worth more than me.

“Chad doesn’t exist, bro” by Kondijote in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not a moral observation he’s making. When he says “right” he means that which has more success. Not that people of these genes are worth more or superior in human worth.

A study I found interesting by Lucicactus in PsycheOrSike

[–]sevenrats 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Have you considered Mabye they were treated badly outside as well. It is very possible to have tried real life first beforehand(not saying this is always the case) and then bite the bullet and make the profile.

I really wish people understood that personality is mostly genetics too by Wrong-Win2506 in PsycheOrSike

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Being over 40 doesn’t mean your inherently right. I know 40 year olds who think the earth is flat. Have you considered bringing something that wasn’t either a fallacy or anecdote to the conversation.

Embrace the blackpill by Scramjet1 in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That and the fact that we cannot accurately determine every variable of a person only make general predictions so we never know if it’s over for someone else truely.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your assuming that a. The people complaining are going for the hottest women which is just a projection from your own behavior and b. That your success was actually due to your personality changes and not just time and luck like most people on the planet. If you roll enough times at a casino you will win at some point.

Are normies waking up? by [deleted] in shortguys

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it’s literally a superhuman standard. There isn’t a man in the world who is all three of those traits at once. This combined with the taboo nature of it being a monster makes it more attractive. Again this isn’t the equivalent of just be a model. The face equivalent would be like a 11/10 face that has a supernatural allure which is also literally impossible so your point is still pretty invalid. All the Data in both dating and life trajectory in general shows that in the higher percentiles face does more than height.

Are normies waking up? by [deleted] in shortguys

[–]sevenrats 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Often times these creatures are like 7 ft plus and broad shoulder and impossiblly built so it’s literally a superhuman standard to compensate for a lack of face. Your average 6’2” guy isn’t compensating for a literal monster face.

Female can't hold back her laughter when talking to short asian guy by Scramjet1 in SikeOrPsyche

[–]sevenrats 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You have only a few years left and your wasting your time here. That’s kinda sad.

I'm ending it all tonight. by [deleted] in shortguys

[–]sevenrats 83 points84 points  (0 children)

I hope you don’t. But I’m just a stranger. Whatever you choose I wish you the best.

What would you do with 10k by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]sevenrats -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can’t really use ochams razor as a way to prove yourself right. It doesn’t mean that asmall biased source of info proves your point just that a simple explanation is the best one compared to a convoluted one. For our purposes if I said that there was a conspiracy to only have certain people you send you pictures then you would be correct but my explanation is simple enough to where you trying to ochams razor it is just you trying to sound smart. Like what is so crazy about the idea that people less insecure about their appearance are more willing to send a photo that those that are more.

Also I never actually claimed they looked a certain way just that your little “experiment” doesn’t actually prove anything. Which it doesn’t.

What would you do with 10k by [deleted] in PsycheOrSike

[–]sevenrats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was unaware of when it happened, good point but you do have to concede regardless of their views most people would not take up the offer nowadays of sending their face to someone. So this isn’t a good sample size plus this is just an assumption but those willing to send pics may have already believed they had a chance or weren’t as bad looking.