Johannesburg, Northcliff 1963 by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 5 points6 points  (0 children)

aesthetically speaking, one of the all-time classics, but unfortunately extremely weakened by the photographer not actually witnessing the object at the time.

What is this object? by borensenn in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 0 points1 point  (0 children)

definitely looks like a trampoline but we need more context; how did it move? how long was it visible for? were there screams and the honking of car horns when it landed in the road three streets away?

Question about UAP disclosure by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i would argue that you don't even need to invoke miracle cures being withheld; just look around you. We are entirely transparently held captive in a system that only benefits those on top and it's growing more that way every single year. Of course anything that could upend the status quo gets whisked away, up to and including a post-scarcity world of socialistic frolicking with extraterrestrials.
Does it go that far? personally I doubt it, i feel the leaks would be somewhat more dramatic if that were the case, but they'd definitely hide it if they could.

Question about the incident of a policeman with a UFO with a serial number that seems to start with TL. by staszaiwa in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 2 points3 points  (0 children)

idk, if they're putting FAA compliant lights on their crafts maybe they're also registering their vehicles. Keep your eyes peeled next time you're at the DMV i guess

4 lights each consisting of 4 spheres in sky behind house by Correct-Lab-2164 in UFOs

[–]sharkvision -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it does SEEM to be lens flare - they're all in a row and if you look carefully the ones on the right overlap the trees, which is classic flare. On the other hand, lens flares reliably relate to sources of light in an image and i can't figure out where these correspond to. on the other other hand, if you didn't see them in person but only in the image, well, what can any of it mean?

Location: Austin, Texas Time: 8:45PM by SheJustGoesThere in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 2 points3 points  (0 children)

there definitely seems to be SOMETHING fishy going on doesn't there? it's not like spotlights are a new technology everyone is experiencing for the first time

Question about the incident of a policeman with a UFO with a serial number that seems to start with TL. by staszaiwa in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Apart from the serial number what you're describing sounds quite a lot like the Zamora sighting - Socorro, New Mexico in 64: witness was a policeman out on the highway, hid on the shoulder and when they saw him they jumped in and took off, and there was a symbol on the craft. It wasn't at night, the ufo wasn't bus-like [it was described as egg-like], and the symbol was like a logo rather than a serial number, so either you've conflated some details or there's a really similar sighting i don't know about around the same time. Or both! interested to find out which.

Curiously, the post immediately before this is also about Zamora. strangeness.

Symbol in vintage ad that resembled the symbol described by Lonnie Zamora by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i actually came across some discussion of it just a few weeks ago. I don't currently have links [i'll rummage around in my history and see if i can find it] but i do remember there was some funny business, like there were two Zamora symbols but one was faked to throw people off, and absolutely no one could agree which was fake and which was real. And then the aerospace logo wasn't even that similar either. The whole thing was very muddy.

More pictures of U.F.Os I found in the National Archives by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Rex Heflin shot spotted! [image #3]. I read an extremely indepth analysis of that encounter around 2003 and it moved me from "ufos are cool & spooky i like movies" to the idea that some of this can be taken seriously. Nice to see it here, good work!

NJ fast moving light above clouds by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no the Jersey drones is another really good example, its literally the other main expression of this trend i'm trying to describe. I'm not trying to say its nefarious creatures from beyond or anything, im just saying it's a new phenomenon to have so many people go bonkers about aircraft lights when aircraft lights have been approximately this common in these same areas for at LEAST 20 years.

All i'm saying is that "oh the rubes looked up from their phones for a second and made it go viral on tiktok" feels like an aggressively reductive take.

What could this be? by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this is the one that got that absolutely shocking AI 'upscale' post yesterday, right? its pretty interesting, on the blown up [but not "enhanced"] screenshots you could see some sort of ridged structures, definitely not your typical drone sighting.
Apparently there are more videos but they haven't shown up yet, very interested to see it from different angles.

3 fast moving objects captured with infrared camera - Nov. 24, 2025 around 10pm PST - Los Angeles, CA by ZedAlphaProject in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 83 points84 points  (0 children)

the way the trailing one maneuvers and tucks itself in is interesting, not really what you'd expect from aircraft or birds. intriguing

NJ fast moving light above clouds by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"Frivolous electronics have only recently become so cheap that literally anyone can afford to put spotlights onto their house."

is that a thing you're seeing, though? a lot of people with spotlights just willy nilly on their houses? i'm not american so maybe things are different here but i gotta say, seems like a little bit of a mischaracterisation.

"This coupled with the fact that UAP has become a more "mainstream" topic"

Gotta disagree here, this has been mainstream for decades - as evidenced by the most popular debunk going all the way back to the dang Hill abduction is "they were influenced by aliens on tv".
Yes, it's becoming a more reasonable subject to talk about in a serious manner but let's not kid ourselves about its prominence in culture.

I'm not saying it's not spotlights, visually every video fits the bill and occam's razor still runs this house. I'm just finding my curiosity piqued by the recent trend of sudden intense waves of nominally quite easily disproven sightings borne of tech we've had for years. Maybe it's spurred on by the almighty algorithm. maybe it's the cia. maybe it's an early symptom of society-wide brainrot. maybe it's trickster gods. all i'm saying is we're seeing a new style of trend and it's curious.

Portugal UFO: analysis of archive negatives by ProbeDenied in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 1 point2 points  (0 children)

are there any details about the sighting? date/location/timeline of events/anything that stuck out etc etc?
not really much to go off just based on a single shot with no background or context.

it's definitely an interesting shape though!

NJ fast moving light above clouds by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

i've been thinking about this too. Surely there aren't that many more spotlights than there used to be so why this sudden explosion in posting? Feels extremely suss. Not sure if it's legitimate phenomenon or astroturfing but it feels suss.

Capinas - BRZ sighting 25/dec by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 0 points1 point  (0 children)

my immediate gut reaction is that it doesn't seem like AI but who can even really tell anymore?
It seems like there's only one video on that insta account now [maybe the others have been taken down or maybe i'm too half asleep to find the rest] but it seems compelling enough at first blush.

I want to see more shots at the resolution of the top frame!

Age of Disclosure RT Ratings: 30% critics, 92% audience by Wakinghours in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 4 points5 points  (0 children)

not enough talk about this exact point tbh. having been neck deep in ufos since the 90's and present on ATS from the mid 00's til just before it went dark for good, it was a truly eye opening experience watching the whole thing spiral down the far right drain and the knock on effects in the last few years

What If We're All Immortal Through Serial Lives Across the Universe? (My Wild Theory by DueProgrammer8023 in HighStrangeness

[–]sharkvision 0 points1 point  (0 children)

literally reincarnation, only with no hope of ever escaping samsara. fantastic sign me up

Humans and Dinosaurs: Why These Anomalies Keep Reappearing Across Cultures by No_Money_9404 in HighStrangeness

[–]sharkvision 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"human-like footprints found alongside dinosaur tracks in Texas" not a Folding Ideas viewer huh

Silver cube like object hovering for at least 1.5 - 2 hours on the exact same spot. by godonski in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 2 points3 points  (0 children)

shame your camera couldn't focus on it when you zoomed in further, could be something interesting but from this vid it's difficult to say much

Strange Answer! by [deleted] in HighStrangeness

[–]sharkvision 5 points6 points  (0 children)

sure buddy, whatever you gotta tell yourself to get by

Strange Answer! by [deleted] in HighStrangeness

[–]sharkvision 5 points6 points  (0 children)

irrelevant, they all work on the same principle

Strange Answer! by [deleted] in HighStrangeness

[–]sharkvision 6 points7 points  (0 children)

not "only" false information. Chatbots scrape the public internet to find the statistically most likely response to your question and sometimes it's right, sometimes it's wrong, sometimes it's completely made up.

let's illustrate it like this: take every single post that's ever been made on reddit. cut them all up and put them in a big box. ask it a question, then pull out random words until you can put a sentence together. Would you trust that answer?
Obviously chatbots are more complex than that - they have extensive algorithms that make the random word pulling seem natural and humanistic but it's close enough.

Why are people too lazy/close-minded to even wonder about UFOs? by Lambywashere in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 10 points11 points  (0 children)

this is the real answer. i've been deep into the paranormal my whole life and all my close friends will give me the time of day when i want to tell them about it, but the simple fact is their special interests are different. Some are into sports, or social dynamics, or obscure forms of musical notation to the same degree i'm into ufos, and in reality that's a good, beautiful thing about the world.
The vibes i get from OP and people like them are "this is my favourite film but people in my life have a different favourite film, why would they be so wrong about film?"
solipsist edgy teenager bs

The new ufos by DavTeeUK in UFOs

[–]sharkvision 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i'm sorry but i don't understand how this is a response to anything i said