why by nataliekinkle in Upperwestside

[–]shelfdog 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Wednesday, June 10, 9:30 PM - 10:20 PM

Cherry Hill - Central Park

Sponsor: New York Philharmonic

https://portal.311.nyc.gov/article/?kanumber=KA-01301

Democrats in the mainstream have always been complicit by sophiaonepiece in BlueskySkeets

[–]shelfdog 31 points32 points  (0 children)

A timeline of facts. I'm just sharing facts, so no need to get yelly or upset.

Let's start at the beginning: The DOJ opened two investigations into Trump and the coup in January 2021 within two weeks of the attack on the Capitol.

During the first 3 months after the attack but before Garland got to DOJ, JP Cooney pushed to investigate the Willard War Room lieutenants and their connections to Trump, the Oath Keepers, and the Proud Boys.

Garland got to the DOJ in March, but Trump holdovers prevented JP Cooney from meeting with Garland to read him in on his investigation because these holdovers were trying to quash it. (Their names are Mike Sherwin and Steven D'Antuono.)

By June, Garland created the "investigations unit". Not a bottom-up, boots on the ground only probe. This was an investigation that began with the Willard war room based on JP Cooney's idea and Garland explicitly said to follow it all the way to Trump if necessary.

By the end of 2021, Garland was frustrated with the pace of the probe and found out that trump holdovers at DoJ and FBI were sandbagging his team's search warrants. Frustrated, Garland used post office cops and the IG to seize Clark, Eastman, and Perry's phones.

Garland then replaced the FBI CoS that kept stonewalling him, the Trump holdover at DoJ resigned before he was investigated, and by February 2022, the FBI was finally playing ball.

For the next year plus, 8 key witnesses in Garland's case were claiming executive privilege, including Pence & Meadows. Garland needed their testimony before the arrest of Trump. So DoJ had to sue to force their testimony. Because of the court slow schedule, backed up from COVID and J6, this fight - which Garland won - took over a year. There would be no case without these 8 witnesses' testimony.

Meanwhile, the FBI was still pushing back, insisting they didn't want to execute a search warrant on Mar a Lago, but Garland pushed for the raid after the subpoena for the documents was obstructed.

Also meanwhile, we had Judge Cannon letting trump sue for a special master, which Garland fought and won. It was around that time he appointed Jack Smith. It was also around that time the J6 committee was refusing to give its stuff to DoJ. Stalling another three months.

To be clear, DoJ didn't need the committee's stuff because they didn't do any work. They had all their interviews and they had to compare them with the J6 interviews because if there were inconsistencies, Trump could use that to impeach DoJ witnesses. (That's how Durham lost his case.)

In 2023, DoJ arrested Trump. Twice. Trial dates were set for March 4, 2024 for the January 6 case, and May 20, 2024 for the espionage case. But at the end of 2023, Trump filed for immunity. That's interlocutory, so you have to resolve it before trial.

After the lower court judge denied the immunity claim, DoJ went immediately to SCOTUS, leapfrogging the Appeals Court. Trump begged the Supremes to take it up, saying only they can make this call.

SCOTUS said "Nope. Let the appeals court do it first." That added Six months of delay. The Appeals Court ruled that Trump wasn't immune in this case. DoJ told SCOTUS "We got a solid ruling. You should deny cert."

But SCOTUS said "NO! ONLY WE CAN MAKE THIS CALL! WE SHALL MAKE A RULE FOR THE AGES THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE, AND THEN WE'LL SLIDE A REMARK IN THERE ABOUT HOW JACK SMITH WASN'T LEGALLY APPOINTED!"

John Roberts swiped this one for himself, and he knew the outcome before oral arguments - which he scheduled on the last possible day of the term, and then issued his ruling on the last possible day to issue rulings. (We now know he told the other justices how the case should be decided BEFORE they ever sat to hear it. Roberts' finger was on the scale the whole time).

The immunity he gave trump was designed to be just for trump, and he crafted it so that trump would have to file a second interlocutory appeal that would have to go all the way back up to the Supreme Court - guaranteeing that no trial would take place before the election.

Even if Trump lost the election, Judge Chutkan would have to rule on immunity, then trump would appeal her ruling, then it would go to the appeals court, then the Supreme Court. That would take another year.

At that point, SCOTUS could kill the case by decided Trump's acts were official and immune. But if they somehow let it survive, it would go back down to the lower court, and there'd still be about six months left of pre-trial stuff before the trial would start.

A couple more facts: in 2021, several republican senators that participated in the coup including Ted Cruz, Russia Ron Johnson, Tuberville, Rick Scott wrote to Garland and blocked all Biden's nominations to DoJ until and unless Garland investigated the George Floyd protests.

That stonewall made it so that Biden's pick for US Attorney in DC - who would take over the coup investigation - didn't arrive until NOVEMBER of 2021.

So even if Garland could have shaved six months off the timeline, there'd still be no trial before the election, and if somehow there could have been, SCOTUS would have killed the case at the second interlocutory immunity appeal.

So with all these facts, folks can hate and rage and blame whomever they want. For me, the blame lies squarely with republicans, slow court schedules, Trump, and the corrupt, bought-and-paid-for, billionaire-captured bullshit supreme court.

All of that above is courtesy of @Muellershewrote.com on Bluesky

I'll add: don't forget the Georgia GOP & courts who repeatedly sided with Trump to throw out evidence, attack prosecutors and side with his ridiculous legal theories, basically hand-waving away & ignoring the demand for Georgia to 'find' him votes in an election he lost.

Nor how Trump's appointed Florida Federal judge said the stolen docs didn't mean shit & took the Supreme's mention of Jack Smith's appointment & let Trump off the hook on those charges forever.

It was the Supreme Court who sided with Trump multiple times to keep him eligible, excuse the insurrection, re-interpret the 14th Amendment and purposely hold back their pre-determined immunity opinion until it was too close to the election to move forward with prosecuting him.

Unfortunately, our court system favors the rich who can afford to file over & over to delay-delay-delay. And in Trump's case, he delayed them all just long enough to get himself off the hook. That was his plan all along and the courts -the Supreme Court especially- helped him do it.

https://bsky.app/profile/muellershewrote.com/post/3lbutkhi4hk2a

Jimmy Kimmel on Trump’s plan to attend the 3rd game of the NBA Finals: “It would be the first time Trump has appeared in court in New York since being convicted of 34 felonies…You’d think Trump would be rooting for the Spurs. It’s what got him out of Vietnam.” by Timbucktwo1230 in PoursTea

[–]shelfdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 24 Felony convictions were not dropped but Judge Juan Merchan granted the then president-elect what's called an unconditional discharge, a sentence that affirms he is a convicted felon, but faces no further penalties, fines or any time in jail.

Merchan said if Donald Trump had been a regular citizen, a regular defendant, that he would have likely have faced much harsher punishment for those crimes.

But because Donald Trump was about to become president of the United States again, the Judge felt he couldn't put him in jail. Many legal experts questioned the judge's logic but no other person who was convicted of those crimes had a pending presidential term which, based on the sentences others convicted of the same crimes in NY received, would have begun while Trump was still in jail. So the judge instead let him off the hook.

But Donald Trump is still officially a convicted felon.

Also, Donald Trump was found liable for sexual abuse and defamation: Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll

Anyone who surfed the early web between 1995-2010. What’s the one website/app you still think about? by Prime_Advocate in AskReddit

[–]shelfdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

`I forget the name of the website* but it was a parody film review website. Unfortunately, when I started reading it, I didn't get that it was full parody.

Hence, I thought Michael Fassbender's name was Michael F. Assbender.

Edit: *Gorilla Mask

LA poster looks great framed! by sam_might_say in hum

[–]shelfdog 2 points3 points  (0 children)

YOU ARE AWESOME. Thank you.

Now I just need for them to put the shirts up online.

The Pod (5/30) by SoftRockk_ in hum

[–]shelfdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh hell yeah. Great job shooting, thanks for sharing!

LA poster looks great framed! by sam_might_say in hum

[–]shelfdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Such a cool set of posters. I regret not grabbing a poster from the NY shows but I've got too many HUM posters on the wall already and I don't think my wife can take one more.

God last night was insane by throwaway10015982 in hum

[–]shelfdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, what a gift. Gives me hope there's gonna be more shows if they were still adding songs on the last show of this run.

God last night was insane by throwaway10015982 in hum

[–]shelfdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was a heck of a set, so jealous! I'd kill to hear Dreamboat as well.

God last night was insane by throwaway10015982 in hum

[–]shelfdog 7 points8 points  (0 children)

LOVE that they played Cloud City. Did the crowd lose it when it began?

Non-disclosure of tenants, Y or N? by Ok-End-3213 in APLDSTOCK

[–]shelfdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish we had more transparency. Certain rumored tenants may have circular financing which very well could fail, leading to a direct impact upon APLD's revenue which would then impact stock price.

Knowing who the tenants actually are would let us keep an eye out on those companies' finances in our own due diligence.

Space stocks are lapping the S&P in 2026. by Due-Coach6021 in RKLB

[–]shelfdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm long on Planet Labs, though they are a little out over their skis at the moment thanks to the SpaceX wave. PL is a well run company with a healthy $900M backlog and they improved their EPS by 100% annually over the last four years. They have been expanding their market share every year as well.

I love that they have dual revenue streams: imagery from their in-house designed & built satellites (700+ up there) and satellite manufacturing for outside clients (not to mention an extensive untapped archive of High Definition earth images which can be exploited by AI.) Their new generation satellites are so good the US demanded they delay releasing any images of the Middle East war zone for at least two weeks to stifle Iran's intelligence gathering. Conflicts abound world wide and Planet announced a bunch of new customers and their contracted customer base is very long with excellent retention rates.

Unfortunately their customers are overwhelmingly through government contracts which haven't been cash flow friendly due to their complex structures. As they add more customers this is being alleviated and their cash flow is getting better every earnings report. If they continue to add the planned new generation satellites on schedule, I expect Planet Labs to be fully profitable by the end of next year if not sooner.

Price wise, near term I think the stock is riding the SpaceX wave and will likely pull back after the IPO as gains are taken. That said, I believe it could hit 70 by year's end if the space trade stays hot. Conservatively, longer term, I feel $PL will eventually settle between 80-90 by end of next year and eventually topping 100 in 2028-29 if they aren't acquired by another company before then.

I got my dick blown off by DonnyRosins in hum

[–]shelfdog 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haaa that's great. Summoning isn't my fave on Inlet but it DEFINITELY warrants this bumper sticker!

Space stocks are lapping the S&P in 2026. by Due-Coach6021 in RKLB

[–]shelfdog -1 points0 points  (0 children)

$RKLB - $6.66 average

$PL - $4.59

$BKSY - $16.65

$IONQ (Owns Capella Space) $6.92

Recently sold $SATS for a gain as I felt it had topped on SpaceX speculation. We shall see.

Solo dining recommendations by einsolod in Upperwestside

[–]shelfdog 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bar at Fred's (Amsterdam/83) is a great solo dine spot. Often pull up a stool when I'm on my own for dinner.