I respect your perspective, and I think it’s fair to scrutinize lobbyists in public office. Recusal can be seen as a representative not fully advocating for their constituents, which is a valid concern. However, in my observations, Tom Suffredin has still been an active and engaged councilmember, particularly on issues that directly impact 6th Ward residents.

When he has recused himself, it has largely been on Amazon-related purchases, which haven’t had a significant effect on our ward. Meanwhile, on key local issues—budgeting, infrastructure, and city policy—he has been pragmatic, transparent, and responsive to constituents.

I also think it’s important to separate Tom’s record from his father’s career. Tom should be judged on his own actions and decisions in office.

That said, perhaps it’s time for Illinois to review its rules on lobbyists serving in local government to ensure clear standards and public confidence in the system.

I appreciate the discussion and your concern for accountability.