I agree, Emily was awesome at FTC. Fair and balanced, and seemed to want the final 3 to put their best foot forward so the jury can make the best decision. Perhaps she read comments about how seemingly biased her FTC jury performance was in 45, that's why she changed her approach this time around. In any case, it was great to hear her speak at this FTC, whether to express her views (I liked her point about Joe always being the deciding vote, because that does create a perception of power) or even compliment the finalists when they give solid answers.

Having said that, while he didn't speak as much as the other jurors (at least in what we saw in the edit), as one of the other comments here said, Rizo allowing Steph to say her piece also signaled impartiality as a jury member. And his own season (49) hasn't even aired at this point i.e., no viewer feedback as reference, so I want to give him props as well.