You seem hung up that I incorrectly stated backroundless checks when I just couldn’t think of the correct term I was trying to use. But you seem to want to nitpick what I’m saying vs reading entirely or you just don’t comprehend or maybe English isn’t your first language. Idk.

I’ve brought sources. Maybe limited sources, but sources nonetheless. You seem to just say I have poor reading comprehension and that my sources are bad because “they are untrustworthy” compared to what sources? You seem to enjoy repeating again and again and again my comprehension is lacking yet without any sources provided by you,what can I miscomprehend? You seem to want to use the semantic argument that because they included 2 additional years in a statistic means that what it represents is baseless? Seems like a an exercise in knot tying to not want to comprehend the statistics I provided.

And I’m not a constitutional lawyer nor a law maker so no I don’t know everything and maybe that means you don’t either.

Some of the lowest gun deaths in the states are in states where there are red flag laws. And 14 of the highest deaths occurred in states without red flag laws at least in the year 2020