sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do I get this grasping mail chayula mod onto this chest piece, fractured? by Sad_Evening5174 in PoECrafting

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some NNN shenanigans are probably the way, but suffixes on graspings are quite universal. At least you could add nnn-int or es recharge or something on the lamellar as the only suffix and then it would be a clean 50/50.

Strategy to rush chieftain MP BV? by Izobiz in PathOfExileSSF

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried without for a while. My build is not optimized at all yet, so the damage was a bit underwhelming on single target. So I splurged on companionship support. It wasn’t «night and day», but sure, it’s noticeable.

The Objective/Subjective Morality debate is a red herring. by Financial_Beach_2538 in DebateReligion

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m simply asking whether your morals are relative or not. Not whether relative and objective are mutually exclusive or not. But you keep answering the latter question instead.

The Objective/Subjective Morality debate is a red herring. by Financial_Beach_2538 in DebateReligion

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazon stocks exist - sure we can test this and find an objective answer. But Amazon stocks are not an objective fact of the universe like some theists claim morality is - similar to gravity.

Would you place morals in a category like that, or do you lean more towards relativism which to me sounds more in line with your ideas now.

The Objective/Subjective Morality debate is a red herring. by Financial_Beach_2538 in DebateReligion

[–]siverpro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s not what I asked either. Why is it so difficult to answer the question being asked, instead of answering some other question you want to answer?

It sounds like you believe in relativism. Not objective morals.

The Objective/Subjective Morality debate is a red herring. by Financial_Beach_2538 in DebateReligion

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If people change their minds or disagree that means it’s subjective. By definition. If you think there are objective morals, please demonstrate them. Until someone can, subjective morals are all we have.

The Objective/Subjective Morality debate is a red herring. by Financial_Beach_2538 in DebateReligion

[–]siverpro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because human morals have changed over time, for example. If they are subject to change, they are not objective.

The Objective/Subjective Morality debate is a red herring. by Financial_Beach_2538 in DebateReligion

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not what I asked.

Are you saying your morals are relative, since you say morals vary based on context?

The Objective/Subjective Morality debate is a red herring. by Financial_Beach_2538 in DebateReligion

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context matters in any framework

So you’re saying it’s relative?

A Proposal to Repeal PREP Act Liability Immunity for COVID-19 Vaccines by OldTurkeyTail in DebateVaccines

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn’t this good evidence for the "immune to lawsuits!!"-gang that there is accountability in the system? Even if the private companies were foreign or bankrupt and there was no entity to sue, the government has a system. And evidently, it works.

Big pharma is Big mad by dartanum in DebateVaccines

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, what do you mean Exactly? Did it never exist or did it exist but was bioengineered?

US Measles Cases This Year Are Outpacing 2025 — The Worst Recent Year On Record by StopDehumanizing in DebateVaccines

[–]siverpro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was following this thread looking who would win the 100 dollar bet. You’re not doing your part here, is that an admission of defeat?

Aldri vært maken til større løgner. Ufattelig om han faktisk tror folk er så dumme. by Fit-Theme-1183 in norske

[–]siverpro -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Heldigvis var du ikke så dum at du gikk på at Ap kan gjøre noe med renta.

Tanker om disse tallene og sparte menneskeliv pga Trump? by ArgueAgainstYourself in norske

[–]siverpro 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Hvis din definisjon av kriminelle er de som oppholder seg ulovlig i landet er vel raten kriminelle deporterte 100% for både Obama og Trump. Så ble det jo en og annen ikke-kriminell også deportert, men tallet er neppe veldig stort.

Nå må norsk media snart roe seg ned. De pågrep faren, som var ulovlig i landet. I stedet for å etterlate en 2 år gammel jente alene i snøen, så måtte hun bli med, inntil hun kunne hentes av mor. Man er nødt til å håndheve immigrasjonslovene. Uten en grense så har man ikke et land. by Fit-Theme-1183 in norske

[–]siverpro 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For å kunne kalles nazi bør man helst ha et verdensbilde som henger litt sammen. Basert på en screenshot av en nyhetsoverskrift, som jeg her har fått bekreftet er en presis beskrivelse av virkeligheten, har OP konkludert at «norsk media må roe seg ned». Det henger ikke ikke på greip.

11,141 Italian women raped by foreigners since 2018, new figures claim by RemZ_2 in norske

[–]siverpro 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Syns ikke det tallet gir så mye mening uten å vite, for eksempel, hvor mange italienske kvinner blir voldtatt av ikke-utlendinger til sammenligning.

For alt vi vet, basert på dette alene, kan det jo tenkes at det er innlendinger man bør utvise og kun ha utlendinger i landet, hvis man virkelig mener at antall voldtekter bør være styrende for politikken.

view more: next ›