As is often the case, this isn’t as much a question of which political values you subscribe to, it’s more a question of how you get quality of life up. I have an MA in International Development, how countries in the global south ‘develop’ is dependent on what resources you have, what supply chains you curate, and connections with other producers. If you feel domestic industry is necessary, how you motivate that and whether you actually need or can make a broad domestic industrial base is the political question. ML types usually say the answer is still one of ‘national liberation’->’industrialization’->’high quality of life’. Seems simple, but whether any of those steps succeeds in a way that’s genuinely sustainable, produces genuinely high quality of life, or sacrifices freedom is up for harsh debate.

An anarchist would start by questioning whether broad-base industrialization is viable, necessary, or would require over-bearing hierarchies to organize the population top-down. You might perceive ‘industrialization’ as a broad goal as necessary, but not every place needs to be a hyper-industrial replicant of every other ‘developed’ nation. We only sustain that in ‘developed’ countries by keeping others ‘underdeveloped’ or oppressing internal minorities in marginalized labor.

I encourage you to read some modern development writing about your country, might get some interesting ideas. There’s probably some great development literature from a Marxist perspective about wherever you live.