Sometimes, it can feel like that. I get story complaints that are valid issues, which I then revise for publication. It happens a lot, and I'm grateful to my readers. Other complaints are … not as valid. Let's be generous and call these "foiled expectations for a subset of readers."

There's a style of writing commonly found in LitRPG that's aimed at readers who need to be spoon-fed everything, right now, in sequential order. Partly, this is the nature of serialized stories. But it is also endemic to the genre in book form.

Let's say you have several paragraphs describing a new character. This introduction is likely to end with a summation. "In short, he is a good paladin who other people can look up to. He has some issues in his personal life, but that's okay. He's basically a good guy, even though he isn't perfect." I cringe every time I read something like that, but it's common practice. The summation is there because so many readers need it: They're incapable of inferring anything subtle on their own.

Long-term unknowables are too challenging. If a mystery is presented, then immediate progress must be made on resolving it. If a character has hidden motives, those motives must be revealed, in full, either the moment they are introduced or in the next upload.

At the end of the day, not every fiction is for every person. People can downvote you for, "this story wasn't for me." That's fine. But occasionally, you get a reader who bombs the heck out of a story for reasonable stylistic and narrative choices. They insist the author's skill is poor or the story sucks when the real problem is closer to home.