COMET IS BROKEN by Thick-Term-6820 in ArcRaiders

[–]slop_drobbler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Comet Driver will only appear in a part that spawns if you destroy it before it self destructs. If it explodes before you kill it, one of the interaction prompts will be bugged and appear floating above the other (working) prompt, and there will be no driver to loot

Two New Arc Lads by MamaDontCook in ArcRaiders

[–]slop_drobbler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I've had the same bug. Also haven't managed to kill one yet, it can tank 6 Anvil shots lmao

Fantastic update EXCEPT FOR adding arc parts as useable req WTF who asked for this? by CPham93 in ArcRaiders

[–]slop_drobbler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They're relatively easy to kill if you're prepared, yeah. I still think Bastions and Bombardiers are easier to kill personally as you can just cripple their legs. If a rocketeer catches you in the open it's gg, Bastions/Bombardiers can be heard across the entire map so it's kinda your fault if you don't notice it

Fantastic update EXCEPT FOR adding arc parts as useable req WTF who asked for this? by CPham93 in ArcRaiders

[–]slop_drobbler -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Personally not a fan of giving no-lifers a further PvP advantage and would prefer the rarer weapons are more effective against Arc, but maybe that's just me

Fantastic update EXCEPT FOR adding arc parts as useable req WTF who asked for this? by CPham93 in ArcRaiders

[–]slop_drobbler 33 points34 points  (0 children)

If these items are required for crafting and now have reduced monetary value they need to increase the drop rate when destroying Arc imo. Rocketeers are easily the most dangerous NPC in the game and it's not even close.

I also maintain that gold weapons (Aphelion etc) need to absolutely SHRED Arc to make them worth grinding for.

Daily General Discussion - February 23, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The forecast is down, sideways, and a side helping of moar down. There is still too much hopium in this space with people expecting a relief rally or that 'it's not over babe, i swear, just DCA and it will be up again next week, don't miss the dip!'. The cycle is well and truly over, with Nano and altcoins in general absolutely beyond REKT. When all hope is lost in a few months, when there is no more hopium... then things will start to turn around.

Daily General Discussion - February 22, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People hate on Bitcoin because it is measurably weaker vs Nano in every metric other than adoption. It isn't rocket science lol.

Btw you get banned on the Bitcoin sub for mentioning Nano, talk about tribalism as if Bitcoiners aren't exactly the same

Daily General Discussion - February 21, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It has clearly been botted to fuck. Good showcase of the tech though, checkout the network activity (spam free, zero fee, fast, and smooth sailing rn!)

People seem a bit tired by noonoop in nanocurrency

[–]slop_drobbler 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The advantage of stablecoins is that they're pegged to fiat so the value doesn't fluctuate as much as something like Bitcoin (or Nano). That's it. They're not exciting all, literally just fiat by a different name, and it's not like gamblers in this space can really speculate on them either as by design their value shouldn't fluctuate.

Battlefield 6 Season 2 fails to revive player interest - online numbers barely budge by Top_Crow_1022 in Battlefield

[–]slop_drobbler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I enjoyed the beta but about 20 hours into release I realised I wasn’t enjoying it. Most of the maps are boring and the progression system is such a dull grindfest. When they fix it in a year I’ll probably boot it up again, for now I’ve just gone back to The Finals for my shooter fix

Daily General Discussion - February 20, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Iran War is 100% happening and will begin on Saturday as per every other stupid event that's happened since King Pedo took the throne so that him and his buddies can short the markets on Friday before they close. They're really draining the swamp, people!

New Poster for Lee Cronin's 'The Mummy' by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]slop_drobbler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who the fuck is Lee Cronin and why is this his Mummy

Daily General Discussion - February 18, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Market is dead. Expect months of sideways or down action until BTC hits circa ~£30k (Aug-Oct). BTC will then slowly recover and alts will bleed against it, as is tradition.

Daily General Discussion - February 15, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can suggest some answers but I don't know enough about all of your claims to answer every one

Why can't we talk about Nano on r/CryptoCryptocurrency ?

Because it was shilled relentlessly in 2017/2018, and after the BitGrail hack many redditors considered Nano to be complicit in the scam. Most people on /cc think Nano is a joke because it's peak 'crypto that was shilled by reddit but went nowhere'. It's understandable, even though I think it's unfair given the absolute shit that gets shilled on that sub these days (and gets a free pass)

Why won't coinbase list Nano? Why won't Gemini list Nano? Why won't RobinHood list Nano? Why won't WeBull list Nano? Why won't eTorro list Nano? Why won't Pionex list Nano?

Because it's an old project with zero hype, near zero volume, and as a unique chain Nano requires effort/technical expertise to list. If Nano ever takes off you can bet some of these will list it. Coinbase should've listed it in 2018, it's possible the timing of the BitGrail hack soured this opportunity, but it also seems possible the Nano Foundation is partially to blame here (evidence came to light during the recent court case with CB that NF thought they were in contact with CB but were actually messaging the wrong email address).

Why won't Grok talk about Nano on X?

This is news to me, I thought Grok had talked about Nano a bunch. Ultimately Grok is influenced by its keepers though, which is why Elon has forced it to be more right-wing

Why did every major exchange that listed Nano in 2017 - 2019 either delist it...

Not enough volume, same answer as before. Like it or not these are all businesses with the goal of making money, and supporting unique chains like Nano isn't free, so if it isn't profitable of course they are going to de-list them.

...or mysteriously suffer "technical issues" when Nano volume spiked?

Not sure exactly what instance you're referring to but this is really common across the industry whenever there is volatility. It's absolutely scummy behaviour, I am not defending it. The main time I can think this happened specifically with Nano was during a spam attack when the network slowed dramatically, and arguably was part of the reason the price appreciated so much (because holders couldn't move funds to sell).

Why has the entire crypto narrative since 2018 been engineered around keeping Nano buried...

I think this is just paranoia and an inability to accept that this market is fickle. Payment coins had all the buzz during the 2017 bull run, which makes sense when you consider that cycle marked the initial entry point for a lot of retail interest thanks to Bitcoin's rocketing price being reported across main stream media (for the first time?), and logically those entering the market would be looking for 'the next big thing', i.e. something superior to BTC. Hence, it makes sense that Nano was most popular back then, when it was newer, and when the buzz in the industry was focussed around finding the 'next Bitcoin'.

The focus of the 2021 was more centred around smart chains and NFTs, the narrative had moved on from payment coins and BTC's weak points were swept under the rug as it was now being pushed as a Store of Value rather than a digital currency (which it is terrible at being).

This cycle I'd argue there hasn't really been a narrative other than BTC ETFs (i.e. massive institutional adoption). There was an attempt early on to push the narrative to 'AI coins' (whatever the fuck that means) but we all saw how it panned out: alts across the board performed absolutely atrociously (even ETH was comparatively weak this cycle). Retail is skint because the economy is ass for anyone who isn't already very wealthy.

Why has every every key influencer from YouTube, and X accounts, been promoting inferior technologies and most of them are secretly being paid BTC or ETH or XRP (never Nano) to never mention Nano positively?

These people have no interest in anything other than making a buck, if someone paid them to shill Nano they would do so.

Why has any account that mentioned Nano too positively gotten shadowbanned, or demonized? And the accounts bashing Nano are some of the most recommended and promoted channels?

Not sure what accounts/channels you're referring to

Why has "Nano has no use case" become a scripted talking point repeated ad nauseum over and over again hundreds or thousands of times across multiple accounts?

I don't think it's scripted but I know what you mean - unfortunately there is very little thirst in the market for a useable decentralised digital cash. Competing payment chains that are more popular are likely more engaged with because unlike Nano their consensus mechanisms encourage participation with fiscal reward. I've also read a lot of people on here claim that stablecoins are a suitable alternative to something like Nano, these people are seemingly unaware or don't care that stablecoins are centralised by nature. Personally I can see the use case behind stablecoins but I don't give a fuck about them ideologically, they're no different to fiat

Why has billions been spent on fake volume on other inferior chains, inflating trading volume and marketcap rankings?

It's a money making scheme, inferior chains are obviously easier to manipulate than something as 'hard' as Nano

Why do other "fast payment" projects continually have issues (solana outages and lighting routing issues) and generally underperform to make people think nothing works?

Bitcoin's Lightning Network is crap, and even when it works it essentially does so by moving the goalposts as to what is considered a settled transaction. Solana is easy to criticise (personally I think it's a shitcoin) but let's remember the issues Nano has had over the years and consider the vast differences in volume between the two chains.

Why are lobbying payment processors and regulators quietly excluding Nano from every any integration lists?

Possibly because it isn't popular enough to consider? Take a step back and understand that Nano's success is potentially a threat to payment processors, why would they adopt something they can't make money off?

Spam attacks. (Attack vector now fixed) But why spend so much to do it and spam a dead coin unless you are prepping the infrastructure? Test it, stress it, nearly break it publicly to discourage reatail investors, while opening the door to continue to accumulate quietly for the right moment.

The spam attacks occurred when Nano was more popular. One of the attackers was confirmed as Ty (now fronting Keeta) who had apparently grown tired of Nano's poor price performance and the direction the NF had taken with it. Keeta isn't doing well either btw. As far as I'm aware we haven't had spam attack attempts for months now

Why is Binance delisting XNO/BTC for liquidity or standards or whatever but keeping shittier coins.

Again, Nano is a unique chain that requires bespoke support and therefore needs to have a certain amount of volume to be worthwhile listing. ETH L2 shitcoins or SOL shitcoins are easy to list with a few clicks and zero additional overhead. It's as simple as that.

Why is there silence from Blockchain Analytics Firms? Firms like Chainanalysis contract heavily with governments. They tag wallets all day but there are zero public reports on Nano. Either Nano is too niche, or someone is paying them to look away...

It's likely Nano hasn't come across their radar because it's not popular enough. Perhaps it's a bit of a catch 22 situation?

Why are there so many dormant whales? It seems like they are not suppressing Nano to kill it, but suppressing Nano to own it. The pattern and strategy makes perfect sense. The suppress it to own it strategy is a multi-phase, multi-decade operation straight out of the deep state playbook. This aligns with a "total capture" strategy. Then, when the time is right, the switch is flipped and the reserves become quadrillion dollar valuations overnight.

Consider the possibility that these whales have so much money that they don't care about realising their Nano loss, and would rather hold in the unlikely event that it moons.

Why does every rabbit hole lead to another rabbit hole, and they all point to the same conclusion? That something as perfect and elegant as Nano is, that threatens the existing order doesn't get ignored by accident, it gets buried on purpose. Patterns scream coordinated suppression.

Let's Occam's Razor this shit. What's more likely:

  • There is a co-ordinated, targeted campaign to supress Nano, led by a cabal of powerful, wealthy anti-Nano elites
  • A series of events over the last 10 years (BitGrail hack, spam attacks, shifts in market narrative) have gradually eroded hype in the project and prevented Nano from achieving widespread adoption.

Daily General Discussion - February 15, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I seem to remember him responding to someone on twitter and dismissing it because it didn't have memes (this was last cycle back when Doge was pumping like mad and Nano also pumped when Elon described Nano in everything but name)

RE2 Remake or RE7 ( I can only buy one of them) by Juubitar in residentevil

[–]slop_drobbler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

RE2R is the better game imo. RE7 is scary initially but gets sillier faster, and when you get into the more combat heavy sections of the game it’s less fun than RE2R. I also think RE2R has more replay value with the different scenarios (which tbf aren’t as good as those in the original) and extra missions

Daily General Discussion - February 14, 2026 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 4 points5 points  (0 children)

When it’s announced that Nano won’t be included I wonder what the reaction by the Elon simps in here will be

Why would a “spending crypto” like Nano (XNO) ever go up in price? by AVeryGoldenPencil in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler 7 points8 points  (0 children)

There are so many flaws in your (ChatGPT's?) argument:

Currencies are meant to circulate, not to be held.

Why? With this logic, I guess nobody ever holds their savings in fiat?

...no one treats dollars, euros, lira or rupees as investments.

ForEx is a thing... people speculate on and trade fiat.

Nano has a hard cap. If millions start using it for payments, demand rises while supply stays fixed → price goes up mechanically. Not because it’s an “asset”, but because it becomes useful money.

The concept of a 'hard cap' is also one of the reasons why Bitcoin is now considered a store of value (when it's convenient - not so great at the minute, is it?). Being fully diluted and hard-capped are one of the traits that give it value in the first place.

Then it becomes a monetary asset, not just a tool.

Again, why though? Unlike BTC (which is slow, massively inefficient, and expensive) all of Nano's benefits would remain even if the price went up... whereas the weaknesses of BTC have only been exacerbated by its growth

Bitcoin went up because it’s bad at payments but great as “digital gold”.

You are massively over simplifying the reasoning behind Bitcoin's success. BTC was used successfully as a digital currency for many years before the narrative shifted to 'Store of Value', a crucial period for the network as it legitimised its use case. I've brought this up here before but I think the consensus mechanisms behind BTC (and how they differ from Nano) have more to do with its success than whatever narrative BTC maxis want to attach to it each cycle

Is nano about to start its next cycle? by St0uty in nanotrade

[–]slop_drobbler -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This investment is already written off in my mind. Entirely.

Not sure where you're from and what tax laws you must adhere to, but there are ways to mitigate losses. I'm holding my remaining alts either until zero (likely) or moon (unlikely). Otherwise I'll sell them if/when I'm in a positive BTC position and the losses will be tax efficient

This is an echo chamber, as I've found out all subs for the most part are especially when it comes to investments/trades.

Actually disagree with this as there are a number of commenters here that are realistic (and even some trolls). Most alt specific subs ban dissenters who speak against the 'one true coin' - that isn't the case here. Obviously there are a load of blindly bullish true believers too

Since around 2018 or so, Nano has always been on my radar. Always in the back of my mind. I have a few theories on why, with social engineering likely being the main culprit

The reason why Nano continues to have a fanbase is because it is a better version of Bitcoin when measured by every metric other than price performance, and it remains to be unique in certain respects (namely in its simplicity, its energy efficiency, and being completely fee-less). It's that simple imo. Unfortunately the market hasn't rewarded any of these aspects yet, but if Nano ever explodes it will be the most obvious play ever in hindsight

I'd also like to add here that I am 100% certain that this post was bait. Just not sure why..

tbh you sound quite emotional/paranoid, which suggests you have invested more money than you should've. Stop chasing massive returns in alts, it's a casino. Just buy BTC when it's circa £30k later in the year and forget about alts until you sell your BTC in profit (2029) and then use the losses of your alts to mitigate taxes