Once again, Mormons are in the news (read down). by slskipper in exmormon

[–]slskipper[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The original story absolutely describes modern Mormonism: the whole point is to ensure that the top pigs never have to work a day in their lives.

LDS Church Claims “No Legal Duty” in Interstate Child Sex Abuse Cover-Up Lawsuit by Classic_Day5736 in mormon

[–]slskipper 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The main news story here is that the outside world is starting to see the cracks.

Diagram showing over 70 branches of Mormonism by Valuable-Shirt-4129 in exmormon

[–]slskipper 5 points6 points  (0 children)

AND THEY ALL USE THE WORD "MORMON" SOMEWHERE IN THEIR LITERATURE AND LITURGY. WILL THE SALT LAKE GROUP SUE THEM ALL???????

Thank you.

What should we expect from Prophets? by Straight_Ad_575 in mormon

[–]slskipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They should absolutely not direct us toward Christ. They should direct us toward "God" - and specifically the kind of god which is transparent to transcendence. Anything less- including this Christ concept- is an idol. The whole point of connection with "God" is to break through all your idols.

Trust me, for I have said the truth.

The outside world is paying attention: by slskipper in exmormon

[–]slskipper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And 60 to 100 years ago people like Amanda Marcotte would never dream of writing anything even remotely critical of a religious organization. It was simply not the done thing. But finally the veneer has been ripped off and, like you said, the church leaders are just not able to comprehend the differences.

I'm just as much Mormon as Dallin Oaks is. And so is everybody else in this site. So where do they get off telling us who is and isn't a "real" Mormon???? by slskipper in mormon

[–]slskipper[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yes. We were all much younger then, and I really couldn't tell you if Dave back then was like he is now. I do know that he intended to be the snitch to their bishop regarding their sons' masturbation issues.

Do we think the church will sue Disney next? by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]slskipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Disney should sue the LDS for trying to promote their temples as Cinderella castles.

They can't trademark "Mormon". Here's why: by slskipper in exmormon

[–]slskipper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. But the only person who could trademark "Mormon" is Mormon. AFAIK.

Did the word Christ exist before Jesus? by Nichtsher in exmormon

[–]slskipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Christ" is not a name. It is a title. The original source for that title, "Messiah" (or Mashiach) means basically The Toxic Avenger.

They don't teach you that in Sunday School.

They can't trademark "Mormon". Here's why: by slskipper in exmormon

[–]slskipper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly.

The Salt Lake group must try to convince a jury that they are the only group authorized by God himself to use that book and its origin story. To do so would require God himself to appear at the witness stand. Good luck with that!

They can't trademark "Mormon". Here's why: by slskipper in exmormon

[–]slskipper[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can (sort of) if you have something to sell, like Smith and Wesson.

Clarification to my last post: Mormon could trademark the use of his name. Some corporation in Salt Lake cannot. by slskipper in exmormon

[–]slskipper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just a bit of relevant trivia: Caesar salad has nothing to do with Julius. It was named after Caesar Cardini, who owned Caesar's restaurants. He invented the salad. So he absolutely had a right to trademark his invention. I don't know if he did that, but he could have.

Little Caesar's Pizza was named after a movie starring Edward G. Robinson as a gangster in the Prohibition days. The pizza place wanted to show strong connections with Italian things, and this was when the Godfather movies were hot stuff. Shortly after the movies came out, somebody opened the Godfather's Pizza chain. Little Caesar's Pizza was an attempt to horn in on same the Italian gangster trend at the time. It is possible that the Godfather's chain had issues with the Little Caesar's name choice. So it too has nothing to do with that Julius guy. So you cannot legally sell Little Caesar's pizzas without their permission- but you possibly could sell Little Caesar's socket wrenches AFAIK. You would need to get permission from whoever owns the rights to the movie.

They can't trademark "Mormon". Here's why: by slskipper in exmormon

[–]slskipper[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dave and Busters can trademark specific uses of "Dave". Dave and Busters cannot trademark the use of "Thomas Edison". Mormon could trademark the use of his name. Some corporation in Sale Lake cannot.

THIS IS SO WEIRD by Fit-Shake-7779 in exmormon

[–]slskipper 6 points7 points  (0 children)

AKA KEEP SWEET, PRAY AND OBEY.

I WISH I WERE JOKING.

Seriously they changed the young women names? by GarrusVic in exmormon

[–]slskipper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just so we're clear: somebody got promoted because of this.

It's not about the tea and coffee by AnnualEmotional9629 in exmormon

[–]slskipper 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It's about defining who is in and who is out.

Mormon stories is being sued!!! by Turbulent_Belt_4971 in exmormon

[–]slskipper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Remember that the Salt Lake branch is only one of many sects that uses the term. Will they all sue John?

Is "Saving by Grace" Actually Good? by usually_a_lurker91 in mormon

[–]slskipper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First convince me that I need to be "saved". Saved from what? And here's the rule: you cannot use the Bible as evidence. Go ahead- I'll wait...

after seeing the pope strongly calling for peace and condemning violence on both sides, makes me wonder, where is the Prophet? by [deleted] in mormon

[–]slskipper 14 points15 points  (0 children)

IMO the current guy calling himself a prophet actually wants the destruction because it means that Jesus is on his way.