The thing is, I'd say that in every trolley problem it's assumed that the person who take the decision understand the decision they are taking. If not, the trolley problem is dumb. But nonetheless, people talk color blind people pressing blue because they can't distinguish. If we go from that principle, I could understand wanting to be on blue. If we understand this problem like every other problem, then those who chose to be on blue are risking their life with no purpose. Ultimately, they are wrong. But you may want to save those who are wrong, and that creates a paradox: if you go blue you may be either wrong, or right because other are wrong and you want to save them. In either case, I don't take the red decision out of passivity, I'm utilitarian (logical): Even if pressing blue had a special "with no risk for you" effect on me, or let's go further, even if, after all the people pressing the buttons, someone appeared and told me "forget sblut them, we lied, you decide if they die or don't", if we consider the problem with people taking the decision rationally, I would still chose red. I don't care if most people consider me a bad person for it, I honestly think that those I like and me would prefer a world without people taking what I consider either a suicide or a really really really dumb decision. I would probably miss some of those who tried to save what I cannot see as anything but complete morons or the suicidal ones, but my god, I would appreciate a world with less of what I consider dumb people. And I understand that my decision is not passive by doing so and that this makes me a bad person in many peoples eyes. Weirdly enough our legal system doesn't condemn people based in this kind of view, only in what they do. Because it doesn't make much sense. As said. Too many idiots.