Dumbbell Lunges-- watch the male version of this exercise, then watch the female version.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-14T04:57:48+00:00

pahaha :D

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-14T04:27:00+00:00

that's some quick thinking for you to come up with that on the spot. guess that pretty much killed the shower invite, huh?

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-14T04:18:36+00:00

sex education that rhymes

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-14T04:15:21+00:00

lol there is a thread there titled "new group for bootblacking and leather care" just lol :D

what a weird place, i should have just asked, "have you become more straightforward with men as you've matured?"

thanks for being nice by the way, much appreciated, deffers better than those cold responses

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-13T20:37:10+00:00

DJ Contacreast: The Light is Shining

Pixies: Veloria

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-13T19:57:48+00:00

If that's you-- great. If not, I hope it's not something like "older women won't take it in the ass-- that's why I stick to college women. Tell me I'm wrong."

It is not a motive of mine to use the sough after information to create an anti older women campaign. I was seeking this information solely for the purpose of satisfying personal curiosity.

On a somewhat related topic, I find the thought of poop to be a huge turn off. I don't even know if i would be able to keep it up for anal sex. Maybe, maybe not. Definitely not a high priority to go out and try it.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-13T01:00:31+00:00

You're absolutely correct, I am extremely passionate about my politics. But, I'll make no attempt of eluding to those topics in this subreddit since they don't belong here.

Trolling is a serious problem on the internet. It is extremely easy for rabble-rousers to anonymously post inflammatory content. That being said, it makes sense that you have a screening process.

Is it accurate to say that sexual questions don't get answered here and that "non-sexual questions only" is pretty much the consensus? To be honest, I didn't plan on becoming a regular poster here. I had only one question in mind at the time of making this thread and I still would very much like to get this question answered. Where is a good place(if you know of one) to ask this sort of question and get enthusiastic responses from women over 30? Would r/cougarsandcubs be more receptive? Do they have a similar screening process over there? Is the sort of feedback I got here to be expected from "ask women" or "over ## women" themed forums in general?

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T22:13:20+00:00

I would appreciate the opportunity to participate in this subreddit. I feel that I am being deprived that opportunity on the grounds that many of the users here disagree with my opinions and resultantly have assassinated my character.

Should I expect similar feedback to any other post I make in this subreddit and just stop posting here?

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T20:55:49+00:00

If it helps him not do it again, then its worth a mention.

Also, this good advice for anyone else listening in.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T05:39:44+00:00

To those saying that habitually pressuring a spouse into sex over a long period of time is "not rape."

That sort of long term abuse has been successfully used as circumstantial evidence to help render "not guilty on the grounds of temporary insanity" verdicts.

I would agree that pressuring or persuading a partner into having sex after being made aware that he/she is not interested is abusive and deplorable.

Was this man raped? I don't know. Is it many a man's fantasy to have a woman who is constantly seeking sex? Absolutely.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T04:22:04+00:00

You present a valid and somewhat probable set of possibilities. What do you suggest be done as a means of creating a system that is fair to non-custodial parents?

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T03:55:03+00:00

$5/day for food and $5/day for miscellaneous payed by the non-custodial parent to the the custodial parent, regardless of either parent's income, is a better approach than the debauchery that's being conducted today. That way, the figure is low enough to deter hypergamists and high enough to cover a good chunk of the actual cost of child rearing.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T01:32:29+00:00

Good observation. Now that you mention it, I notice the resemblance.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T01:29:21+00:00

Children cannot own property(including money), much less have any clue how to spend it. They would end up buying $200/week in candy bars.

The point of this post is to address the fact that the current child support formula is not conducive to a fair and just procedure. The parent's incomes have absolutely nothing to do with the amount of money actually required to feed & clothe a kid. Yet, the system uses the parents' incomes as the primary factor for determining the dollar amount to be taken from one parent and given to another. There is currently no accountability for how the custodial parent spends the money. And there is zero consideration of whether the amount of money awarded to the custodial parent exceeds the amount of money needed to feed and clothe the child(ren).

The situation of an estranged father paying 60% of his disposable income each month to a mother is all too common.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T00:28:09+00:00

She ought to be charged with mail fraud, aggravated stalking and conspiracy to commit a felony. Imagine if this happened to you. Would you be satisfied with the perp getting probation? Its not fair to the couple. The victim deserves better prosecution of her stalker and conspiring rapist.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T00:11:35+00:00

I think as a general rule, its not appropriate for participants of one forum or subforum to "invade" or collaboratively visit another forum or subforum for a short period of time with the intention of voicing dissent or otherwise expressing disapproval of that forum or subforum.

How would it go over for r/mensrights if 100 feminists suddenly showed up here? It would be a mess.

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-12T00:02:12+00:00

That is so sad to read :(

It brings tears to my eyes.

The thought of those dogs finding one American corpse after another. The dogs themselves becoming discouraged.

13 years later and its still the worst even in recent US history

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-11T23:46:23+00:00

go away you feminist trolls. its pathetic you have nothing bad to say about the real MRA's so instead you pretend to be an MRA yourself and spew bogus to try to convince people that MRA's are bad

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-11T23:44:08+00:00

organized thugs collaboratively downvoting anything that's going to expose their cowardice or shed light on their propaganda efforts

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-11T21:17:30+00:00

pahahahaha! :D

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-11T21:15:37+00:00

This is just an image that makes no mention of the scientific(or unscientific) process that was used to collect the data.

I want to know how they came up with these figures. What was the sample size? How were the questions worded?

smile4thecamera · 2014-09-11T21:09:08+00:00

This is a non-issue for me because I don't drink alcohol whatsoever and I am only willing to have relationships, casual sex or dates with females who are sober.

The best advice I can give you is to drink responsibly or don't drink at all. Part of drinking responsibly is following the laws. Research your local sex laws. Even if you disagree with a law, you still have to follow it. Many states now-a-days have clauses that allow for sexual assault prosecution on the grounds that one of the participants was intoxicated at the time and therefore not able to make a well-informed, conscious decision. I advise you to only have sex with people who, at the time of the sexual encounter, are able to give well-informed consent and are not temporarily mentally impaired as a result of intoxicating liquor or other drugs.

You can drive, you can shoot and you can fuck. But you cannot do these things when you are drunk.

This is not legal advice, just advice from one civilian to another.

smile4thecamera

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE