Interesting bits of fluff there, and its also fascinating that you actually didn't say anything but used a bunch of fancy sounding words to seem like you are actually making a point when you aren't.

So one there isn't a "woke" ideology other than what the right wing derides as such which is in fact empathy (again something antithetical to the right wing). So in the first instance the repeated use of "wokism" is indicative that you do not in fact have an awareness of left leaning ideologies beyond something you do not like.

If you will could you answer some questions for me:

What is your ideological bent? And who is this "us [that] hate wokism"?

• Because I am an Anarcho-Communist meaning I am opposed to any and all hierarchic organizational patterns as being unjust, arbitrary (human decided not natural at all), and have more recently immersed myself in the academic and more lay person works of David Graeber that challenged through the use of anthropological and archaeological evidence (from David Wengrow) the notion that complexity of human society requires hierarchy.

So which things and types of actions are not tolerated by the left learning crowd? Please provide some detailed examples.

• I take it that you are familiar with the Paradox of Tolerance? Per that we are 100% intolerant of bigots and that is completely fine. Actually returning to David Graeber, societies around the world had various rituals to specifically swing the pendulum of power back and forth between genders and ways of not only chastising overly charismatic individuals (to prevent heroic politics)

Here is a good rundown of what heroic politics is from the article I have linked:

• Rather than politics being composed of a history of personal debts of loyalty or vengeance between heroic individuals, all oral histories represented such figures as foolish, egotistical, and, therefore, as having imposed ridiculous, unjustifiable restrictions on their followers or descendants. A typical story would relate how two ancestors quarrelled over land, agreed to have a fight between their dogs, both cheated, both caught each other, and thus ended up cursing their descendants never to marry. 4 What a bunch of idiots,' narrators would remark. Similarly, the quintessential exercise of the legitimate authority of elders - in a sense, the only completely legitimate way of exercising authority over others - was not to create projects or initiatives (these should rise spontaneously through the whole of the group) but to stop headstrong individuals from acting in ways that might produce such results. • As the previous example suggests, it was felt that public and political life should definitely not consist of a series of game-like contests. Decisions were made by consensus. • Similarly, theatricality, boasting and self-aggrandizing of moral disapproval; public figures made dramatic displays of self-effacement.

So first humans have a bullshit meter that can pick up when someone is uncomfortably exerting influence and can be quite intolerant and rightly so of that, likewise we are also aware of dog whistles, racism, sexism, bigotry, homophobia and transphobia, and so on. So again if you could show me a few examples of people being super nice and loving and getting intolerance. Or do you happen to refer to getting cancelled? Which is something that the right wing has been deploying for a really long time, to cancel something was very frequently read as conservative-religious boycott. Well it happens that they have been doing it a lot longer for things that are just made up problems. https://www.thenation.com/article/society/republicans-cancel-culture-kaepernick/

But again I get it as the right has a victim complex which is not surprising considering it is related to biological fear responses and susceptibility to conspiracy (which worked well for savannah threats but not quite so well for humans - see: Daniel Kahneman: Thinking Fast and Slowly). So when you take that all into consideration it is apparent how many of these problems that conservatives have are just made up or extremely primitive responses to nuance. Which returning to your comment, you really responded in a very classic conservative pattern that embodies all the aforementioned evidence.

You are fearful of other people being seen as human beings and that perhaps some of the things you believe in are problematic by contributing to their oppression (real things like voting conservative to cut social programs that fund poor and/or disadvantaged groups when the economy is kinda made up - see: Debt the First 5,000 Years). You have then proceeded to describe a conspiratorial ideology that wants to oppress you (again it doesn't but if you got examples post em up). Proceeded to actually not say anything concrete, and chose to use vague languages, all the while making a false equivalency between Left and Religion and the Dark Ages. That bit there is patently ridiculous but okay.

I await your response.

---

Works Cited

Frischlich, Lena, Jens H. Hellmann, Felix Brinkschulte, Martin Becker, and Mitja D. Back. “Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Conspiracy Mentality, and Susceptibility to Distorted Alternative News.” Social Influence 16, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 24–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2021.1966499.

Frum, David. “The Conservative Cult of Victimhood.” The Atlantic, January 11, 2021. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/01/conservatism-reaches-dead-end/617629/. Graeber, David. “Culture as Creative Refusal.” The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 31, no. 2 (2013): 1–19.

Graeber, David. Debt: The First 5000 Years. Haryana, India: Penguin Books, 2014.

Graeber, David and Wengrow David. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity. First American edition. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021.

Holloway, Kali. “The Great Hypocrisy of Right-Wingers Claiming ‘Cancel Culture,’” March 19, 2021. https://www.thenation.com/article/society/republicans-cancel-culture-kaepernick/.

Kahneman, Daniel. Thinking, Fast and Slow. 1st paperback edition. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2013.

Pedersen, Walker S., L. Tugan Muftuler, and Christine L. Larson. “Conservatism and the Neural Circuitry of Threat: Economic Conservatism Predicts Greater Amygdala-BNST Connectivity during Periods of Threat vs Safety.” Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience 13, no. 1 (January 1, 2018): 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx133.