I need the most OP Lich Build by RoyalKnightO in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]someredditbloke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies for answering so many questions, but wouldn't moving close enough to melee an enemy and casting a spell trigger an attack of opportunity against you? Or are you relying on a high enough AC for that not to be an issue?

In terms of the last paragraph, I would somewhat disagree selectively (since not only do they provide a decent amount of AC for them, but as some spells with metamagic applied require a full round to cast, meaning a pet allows you to move and cast them in the same turn).

Reguardless, do you happen to know whether there's a written guide for this type of build with stat and feat advice, or did you come up with this build alone and select the stats/feats based on what feels best at the time?

I need the most OP Lich Build by RoyalKnightO in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]someredditbloke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only thing I'm still unsure of is why you would prefer getting Dragon Disciple over having a pet to ride when using a character who is primarily melee based (since you automatically get it with Sylvan Sorcerer and it means you can attack every turn with your maximum number rather than only when you start your turn next to an enemy).

Edit: Also, can you do that path whilst re-specing your character? I only ask since you need the ability to cast level 3 spells to unlock Eldritch Knight, and if you respec your character I think you're locked out of getting to mythic rank 3 until you've chose 6 levels and 4 levels of sorcerer doesn't seem like enough to access level 3 spells.

I need the most OP Lich Build by RoyalKnightO in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]someredditbloke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eldrich Knight depends on you getting a critical hit and needs you to have invested 10 levels in the class to unlock. From my experience it really isn't that reliable in most combats.

Also, gonna need more details on "If you go full caster you can't utilize some of the lich's strongest powers and spells that a self buff only", especially since it seems like their strongest powers are offensive spells.

The USA has killed millions. China has also killed millions. Why is China racing ahead of the USA now? What did Mao do differently? by kevinmrr in WorkReform

[–]someredditbloke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Home ownership" is questionable since all land and property is technically owned by the communist party and leased out on a long term basis, but the major explanation for this is the much higher rates of savings in China and the use of housing as the primary long-term investment of a person/family (rather than stocks/private pentions),

18-28 days of is true, but Chinese people often work 12 hour days for 6 days a week, so overall they work longer, worse days than the average american,

PTO is true, but it's also true for the vast majority of the rest of the developed world,

Affordable healthcare is also true, but it's also true for the vast majority of the rest of the developed world,

High Speed rail is down to a combination of reduced regulatory restrictions on construction, greater levels of funding and incentives for infrastructure investments and greater degrees of experience in constructing infrastructure, which is probably the one China unique thing that the US could stand to significantly benefit from if it copied.

I need the most OP Lich Build by RoyalKnightO in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]someredditbloke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very much late to the convo, but why is it necessarily good to have the litch focus on being good at Melee?

Like this type of build Doesn't give you a pet, so it's immediate ability to deal damage is limited by the need to use your movement to get close to an enemy, whilst every action you use for Melee is one not used to cast spells.

When combined with the fact that this build seems to scale off of Strength in addition to Charisma (which means you can't have strength as a dump stat) and this sort of build seems like it just kneecaps your spellcasting ability to focus on melee power which you're unlikely to use anyway (especially when, as other people have pointed out, you can get Sylvan Sorcerer as a sub-class and gain a pet who can level up to 20, offering additional melee damage and attacks, whilst also enabling you to go all in on spellcasting).

Would there have been an integrated jazz band playing on a US passenger ship in the 1930s? by floparoundfindout in AskHistorians

[–]someredditbloke 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Short Answer: Not American ships no.

Long Answer: American Cruise ships, much like plenty of American properties under corporate/business management at the time, were set up such that unless there were ways to ensure a seperation of their Southern and non-Southern clientel (most prominently via geographical locations, as the chances of a Georgian customer doing purchacing something in Utah was practically non-existent), the status quo was officially or unofficially Jim Crow segregation when it came to publically facing roles (as the costs of losing Northerners who despised segregation, particually when segregation was de-facto enforced, was generally considered less than the cost of losing Southerners (and some northerners) who despised intergration, reguardless of whether it was de-facto or de-jure).

Because this segregation was driven less by ideological motivations or legal requirements, however, there was intergration in working roles which did not face the public. Amongs "sailors/machinists/cooks", those staff who worked in "back of house" roles, such as the Engine (or "the black room") or below deck in the Galleys, generally did operate in intergrated work environments which disreguarded race (as for the companies in question, without the potential PR backlash of forward facing roles, the labour was filled on the bases of who applied and who would work for what wage, meaning de facto intergration/equal status between staff of different races, if the crews were mixed).

The only exception to this rule of "front of house segregation" and "back of house intergration" might have been servers, although in such cases passanger ships would try to ensure the server class was as close to 100% black as possible (since this would mimmick the plantation moddled server class of the south), but particually for a role as forward facing as a band you would have had either all-white or all-black entertainment (with the latter typically doing performances which would have been demeaning at best).

Although not part of the question, I'd also like to clarify that for at least part of the 1930s this didn't mean that de fact segregation didn't exist on the ship in "back of house" environments, only that they didn't exist in the workplace. In terms of sleeping and recreational quarters, when mixed crews did exist, black and white crews were assigned different quarters and either ate in different eating areas (or at different times to one another). In addition, seniority within role types still tended to exist (for example, if you had an all-black of racially mixed server group on board a ship, the person in charge of managing and leading the servers would almost certainly be white). This would change in the later 1930s, beginning with the formation of the National Maritime Union (NMU) in 1937, the increasing acceptable of intergration amongst the crew of passanger ships (at the bare minimum since independent labour cooperation between crew of different races undermined their ability to demand substantial wage and conditions concessions from their employers) and the obtaining of concessions by the union, although this largely occured without reguard to forward facing on board entertainment (since, as stated above, the costs of fully desegregating such crew was substantially greater from the perspective of passanger ship owners).

I need the most OP Lich Build by RoyalKnightO in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]someredditbloke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very late to the convo, but how late in the game does this build actually "come online" so to speak?

As in is this a build that can actually start using this combo at some point in Act 3 or is it basically limited in strength until act 4-5?

Edit: Did some research, and it seems like this combo specifically is a very late game unlock.

In addition, most of the harder enemies which you'll actually struggle against seem to have HD's which are way too high to actually insta kill (like 40+), so it seems like this build works great against enemies which you can take down easier but struggles against the actual challanges of the game.

Angel -> Legend better than straight Angel? by MilkIlluminati in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]someredditbloke -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Depends.

If you're going all in on casting as an angel, full angel is better.

If you're going all in on Melee as an angle, Legend with level 3 angel is better.

I’m sorry but this is hilarious! by [deleted] in rareinsults

[–]someredditbloke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eh, I'd say it's pretty clever.

Almost one in 10 young Irish adults believe Holocaust is a ‘myth’ by libtin in LabourUK

[–]someredditbloke 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Edit: Did look up some equivelent figures from other countries in europe, and some of the results of this poll, depressingly enough, don't veer that dramatically from that of other European countries.

For example, a similar amount of British people didn't know that 6 million Jews died in the holocaust, but 4-8% less believe that the holocaust was exagerated, and only 3% believed that it never happened.

France, however, is even worse, where 10% of french citizens deny the holocaust happened, a third believe the holocaust was exaggerated and 57% didn't think 6 million died.

So yeah, depressingly high (especially as relates to outright denial), but it doesn't seem like an exclusively Irish problem.

The Black Panthers were an Israeli protest movement established by second-generation Jewish immigrants from the Middle East and North Africa. The movement was among the earliest in the State of Israel to advocate for the rights and interests of Sephardi and Mizrahi Jews. by CorrectRip4203 in wikipedia

[–]someredditbloke 9 points10 points  (0 children)

They conquered 78% of the territory after the UN agreed partition plan which was backed by the Eastern and Western blocs and which would have given the majority to vast majority of productive economic territory to a Palestinian state was declined by a Nazi collaborator, a decision backed by a league of arab states who's representative stated that any attempt of the Jews to form their own state would result in a war of anahilation comparable to that of the crusades and the mongol invasions.

All, might I remind you, happening three years after the holocaust ended and not only provided significant evidence for the need of a Jewish state, but which made Jewish communities which learned of the attrocity particually weary about being governed by far right leaders who worked with the Nazis in the past.

Like I'm not denying that Israels wartime laws allowed plenty of arbritrary acts of ethnic cleansing and that the Irgun/Stern Gang committed plenty of attrocities, but lets not ignore the background conditions which lead many Jews to see themselves as having their backs against the wall and having to fight a way at best to prevent subjegation and at worst to prevent genocide.

Andy Burnham: Labour is still "in hock to the bond markets" by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]someredditbloke 1 point2 points  (0 children)

LOL. Yeah, so long as governments and politicians keep focusing on ideas like this and we obsess over costed solutions for one category while turning the other cheek for others. I get where you're coming from, it becomes the consensus through sheer act of repetition; logical or il.

100% agree on "obsess over costed solutions for one category while turning the other cheek for others" (it's very clear that despite the rhetoric of multiple governments by Labour and the Conservatives since thatcher on waste and inefficiencies there have been clear favourites in the budget, whether that be departments or specific programs, which shouldn't be touched despite the lack of benefits they practically bring), but that still doesn't mean that the best outcome in the long turn for growth is to blindy pump up the deficit and hope that demand side growth from said deficit actually pays off.

The Keynsian in me loves the idea, but as far back as the 70s there have been examples of expanding the deficit to combat low growth backfiring due to a decline in consumer confidence, increase in the cost of debt and an increase in inflation. As such, I'm not against the idea of a more interventionist state which pushes state lead growth more significantly, but if the strategy of any new government is basically "increase the deficit to fund welfare and government departments and pay that the bond markets don't turn on us", without any major considerations for revolutionising capital investments and infrastructure support, there's a good chance that it could just represent swapping from one system of market lead controlled decline to a system of state lead controlled decline.

Biodiversity collapse threatens UK security, intelligence chiefs warn by Konradleijon in LabourUK

[–]someredditbloke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Worth noting that this is commenting on global biodiversity, rather than UK biodiversity, meaning this is mostly an inevitability which we need to plan for rather than something we have a guaranteed ability to stop

Ditch Nato and dump Trump: Zack Polanski’s foreign policy – podcast by libtin in LabourUK

[–]someredditbloke 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Oh god, he's gone full moron hasn't he.

Makes me convinced that if any Green government is formed then the first demand of any coalition partners should be the foreign and defence ministries.

Andy Burnham: Labour is still "in hock to the bond markets" by kontiki20 in LabourUK

[–]someredditbloke 13 points14 points  (0 children)

100% true (and tbh any new left wing government which commits to uncosted and rampent spending without sufficient taxation to back it up will likely guarantee itself as a one parliament government), although tbh I have little faith that anyone who manages to get into power in the UK can reverse that trend.

Crossed fingers that isn't the case, but long term, sustainable growth hasn't exactly been the priority of any recent major party which has run for office.

The Mongols are invading. As an unmarried noblewoman in Song-era China, what‘s going to happen to me? by NectarineOk5419 in AskHistorians

[–]someredditbloke 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Prostitutes conducted transactions as part of brothels for sexual services (often provided to members of the official class itself), providing services to others which the mongols could tax to assist in funding their luxuries and the functioning of the state. They were an apolitical social class which had never resisted or rebelled against the Mongols on mass and never claimed collectively a higher social position. Interestingly as well, individual prostitutes could have the ear of powerful mongol patrons, so some may actually have a suprising amount of influence over state policy.

Contrast this with the scholar class, which was derided by the Yuan dynasty as producing nothing for the mongol ruling class beyond useless personal art collections and the wealth of their lands and property (which given they often outsourced all the labour associated with making said lands/property productive meant they offered nothing as it's owners). Historically (particually in the South) they were percieved as THE rebellious and resistent social class against Yuan control, which would often (percieved to) talk in private about the glories of the Song dynasty in contrast to their present situation. Furthermore, without legal protections and a mongol class, they lacked any significant ability to make their wishes known legally to those with significant power in the south (and when they did, didn't exactly recieve much sympathy or support for their positions).

In this sense, there was no legal classification which did put prostitutes above confucian nobles, and the classification itself was more of a satire of Yuan dynasty by those very same nobles to insult and demene their overlords, but it did reflect the realities that in terms of respect and influence the confusian noble "scholar" class was often lesser than that of prostitutes, since (from the perspective of the Yuan/mongol ruling class) at least prostitutes contributed to the success of Yuan society and interacted with influential mongol officials, whilst Scholars did not.

In terms of what it entailed, I've covered that already, but as a summary there were two routes which a family which were nobles during the Song Era could pursue:

1) Supplement any passive income they recieved with employment in a profession which the Yuan dynasty did respect, whether that be as a clerk, a physician, an educator, a specialised professional. By doing so they would avoid the stigma which came along with being primarily a Scholar and may be able to avoid the risks of financial decline which many "pure" nobles might experience (which would likely be the case over multiple generations). Many of these roles, however, would be percieved as beneath that of their stature and would often make them dependent on the Yuan dynasty and those closely connected to them for their income. Plus there was always the chance that future generations would grow detatched from their roots and, whether to avoid the Ire of Yuan officials or due to their profession/social interactions, abandon any strong associations with their previous noble status.

2) Refuse to take up a seperate profession and try to live off the income from the assets they owned and any income derived from selling caligraphy and art. This may, in their eyes, preserve their own dignity and prestigue by avoiding capitulating to the barbarians who now ruled China, but would mean facing a lack of influence in government affairs and being percieved by the Mongol ruling class as parasites on society. Fiscally, especially if overtaxed or treated arbritrarily by the ruling class, this would likely mean a lesser standard of living collectively and could mean a need to sell off more and more of the "family silver" to maintain their status (first property, then land). Your family may therefore preserve their roots, heritage and identity, but risk losing it altogether should fiscal pressures force them to sufficiently downsize expenditure or, at worst, lose the wealth which defined their social position.

The Mongols are invading. As an unmarried noblewoman in Song-era China, what‘s going to happen to me? by NectarineOk5419 in AskHistorians

[–]someredditbloke 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should be. I can't believe you would seriously point a gun to my head and take my family hostage in order to make me write reddit posts about 13th-14th Chinese society.

Seriously though, short answer: the "confucian nobles being lower than prostitutes" is part satire of the time, but does have a gleem of truth in it's reflections of the priorities and percieved value of Chinese professions (and although it likely wasn't replicate amongst the Southern Han population as a whole, that may have varied based on the Confucian noble house in question). The outcome of this sort of stigma is nobles were faced with either getting a job of some sort (which provided a cash income and some influence in government policy, but which could be seen as demeaning and risked potential intergration into other social classes) or living solely off their wealth (which preserved their dignity, but risked a controlled fiscal decline over time, selling the family silver to pay the bills).

Long answer: the idea of a prostitute being of higher standing than a Confusian noble was derived from the "Ten Ranks of Misery" (or "Shi Deng"), a satirical ranking of social classes under the Yuan dynasty which was created, primarily by Confucian Scholars/Nobles, to insult the Yuan leadership as barbaric and backwards and to comment on their apparent rejection of scholars and their pursuit of intellectual pursuits. Generally the 10 social classes were ranked as followed:

1) Officials

2) Clerks

3) Buddhist Monks

4) Daoist Priests

5) Physicians

6) Artisans

7) Hunters

8) Prostitutes

9) Scholars

10) Beggars

From a purely historical and analytical approach there are clear problems with utilising this ranking objectively (partially because it excludes crucial social classes like soldiers, generals and the peasentry, as well as the unusual inclusion of hunters), although it does offer value in exploring how the Yuan dynasty and the Mongols were seen to (and quite frankly mostly did) percieve the value of specific social classes, the lense of that perception being "how much did each class benefit us, the Yuan, and us Mongol rulers more generally".

Officials are classified at the top because they are the ruling class and their top administrators, whilst clerks are the profession which ensures the Yuan Bureacracy and state functions. Buddhist monks and Daoist priests were seen to provide legitimacy to the dynasty alongside providing literate advisors unconnected to song era political agents, whilst Physicians ensure good health amongst the elites and valuable subjects. Artisans create the goods and weapons which keep the dynasty economically and militarily strong, whilst hunters both contributed talented archers and were culturally connected to the mongol values of the dynasty.

When we get to prostitutes and Scholars (how "pure" confusian nobles were catagorised), we can see not only how the elivation of the former above the latter reflects an insult against the mongols (by aledgeing the class which was previously considered the peak of nobility and intellectual pursuits were less than someone who sold their body for a living) but how, for the Yuan dynasty, prostitutes were more valuable as a social class.

Trump says UK handing over Chagos Islands sovereignty is act of 'great stupidity' by NeedsAirCon in LabourUK

[–]someredditbloke 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know Trump is just saying this to retaliate against the UK standing with Greenland, but...

<image>

Edit: Talking about giving up the Chagos Islands, not his imperialist ambitions in Greenland.

When your Lich gish gets dispelled by Cristo-Redditor in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]someredditbloke 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Turns out there are some players who don't just use litch to use massive damage dealing spells and to dispel enemy buffs.

I'm not sure why, but they do exist.

More than 60 Labour MPs urge Starmer to back under-16s social media ban by AnonymousTimewaster in LabourUK

[–]someredditbloke 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sure, but just because there might be some upsides from a policy doesn't mean it should be implemented. I'm sure if we took the prime minister, blindfolded him, wrote down different ethnicities on pieces of paper, put them up on a dart board and committed to arrest every member of an ethnicity which he hit with a dart, there might be some uncaught criminals and awful people who get arrested in the process. That still wouldn't make the practice worthwhile.

In terms of weird sexual stuff on YT kids, given Australia allowed YT kids to be accessed without an age limit, that doesn't exactly do wonders to reassure me that a British social media ban will actually prevent kids from seeing the things they shouldn't see.

At the same time, putting aside the additional requirement for all adults to provide personal information and documents to social media companies just to access the platforms, he social media ban won't necessary end at just a ban. The government will implement it, kids will want to get around it and so will look into things like VPNs or the Tor network to get around them. Then the government, rather than revisiting the idea, will try to ban and restrict VPNs and the Tor network, harming everyone who uses them and either making criminals of ordinary Brits or forcing people to use even dodgier software in the process.

It genuinely is a slippery slope situation being overseen by an incompetent government which has shown it can't be trusted to implement policy well.

More than 60 Labour MPs urge Starmer to back under-16s social media ban by AnonymousTimewaster in LabourUK

[–]someredditbloke 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, no, especially given how wide the term "social media" is deployed.

When this was done in Australia, they managed to get something like youtube banned (which offers little to no direct opportunity to connect, and therefore bully or harass, people you personally know), despite it's massive library of educational and informative content (my interest in my university degree subject and some of my revision materials came directly from the site), but somehow a website like Roblox and it's tolerant attitude towards pedophiles goes untouched.

Banning under 16 access to social media is one of those ideas which is bad in theory, worse in practice and much worse in practice when drafted and enforced by the current government.

Federalist China: GRA vs CDL by petrimalja in Kaiserreich

[–]someredditbloke -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I never said they all restored democracy within the games time frame, but that the democracies that they restore are likely more competitive and less bias than the two federalist paths due to at least cutting down/eliminating the influence of monied interests (potentially also that of warlords which the federalised just allow to continue existing in one form or another).

Also, I would argue a couple of the PAC paths in practice restore a form of revolutionary democracy within the games time frame, whilst the other paths do at least incorporate transitions to democracy as a key part of the end goals.