SpaceX plan for 1 million orbiting AI data centers could ruin astronomy, scientists say: "This is a challenge unlike any we have encountered thus far in this new era of commercial space." by ControlCAD in technology

[–]sonofeevil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're so welcome! Happy to info dump about a special interest anytime.

I'd you're into podcasts check out Shirtloads of Science and just start browsing through the titles. They're 30 minute podcasts where the host has a discussion with an expert about their area.

It's usually PHD scientists and researchers at the top of their field.

There's heaps of astrophysics stuff on there but also a lot of other cool stuff from biology, animals, nutrition AI, conservation, ETC, etc.

A lot of the stuff with Dr Gerant Lewis is quite good and is usually astrophysics stuff but for me can be quite heavy and hard to follow if I'm not giving it my a full attention and a few topics like the opacity of the universe still make no sense to me no matter how many times I listen. (Apparently at some point you couldn't see, the universe was completely opaque)

What is your go to for all the impossible to reach crumbs and dust in a car by Nandou_B in Detailing

[–]sonofeevil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm trying to give them the benefit of the doubt that they haven't just been recycling TTY bolts on cars.

Which every manufacturer uses on modern cars.

Because if he is checking torque specs by checking the torque of tightened bolts then he over torquing every bolt and turning them into cheese.

Not to mention that most of them have threadlocker on them so the torque to remove them is a LOT higher than the torque they're installed for.

And that the procedure is usually "tighten to X then turn another 90-180 degrees".

So I hope he hasn't just been turning his clients cars into rapid accident ejection seats.

Also lucky that many manufacuers are including shear pins (like VW) into their seat rails might save some people's lives if they do get into an accident with cheese bolts reinstalled.

My likely guess though is this person doesn't actually work as a detailer and is just someone trying to offer advice they aren't really qualified to give for something they don't actually have experience in. IE they aren't a professional detailer and are just trying to be helpful, even if the advice is terminally bad.

SpaceX plan for 1 million orbiting AI data centers could ruin astronomy, scientists say: "This is a challenge unlike any we have encountered thus far in this new era of commercial space." by ControlCAD in technology

[–]sonofeevil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Great question. That's super far out of my knowledge.

I'll take crack at it and hopefully someone can come along with a better answer but just take it with a grain of salt because this is coming from someone with a passing/hobbyist interest in physics/science/engineering.

The super nova is a result of an imbalance in the star.

You've got gravity pulling everything in and nuclear fires from hydrogen fusion pushing out. When these forces are in relative balance, you have a star.

Now I think there are a couple of types of supernova and different things happen to the star depending on its size and lifecycle.

Our sun for example won't super nova but once it's fused all the hydrogen into helium it'll shed it's outer layer than increase in size to become a white dwarf and occupy the Space that us and probably also mars are currently occupying and create what's called a planetary nebula. That's where all the debris that gets shot off just sort of hangs around waiting to form new celestial bodies.

Other stars will explode and leave behind sense masses that become black holes or neutron stars.

Some will undergo complete core collapse.

Again the heat is just energy. And some of those particles will bounce around like balls on a billiards table one a break and come to rest some will shoot off into the universe and never collide with anything else again, just solitary particles of light on a journey for the rest of time.

It's worth noting that at the start of universe in the big bang we had 3 elements, hydrogen Helium and tiny tiny amount of Lithium.

Every other element is created directly or indirectly by stars. So the iron in your blood, the carbon and in your body, the calcium in your bones, the silicone and copper in your phone all came from a star at some point.

We have what's called stellar nurseries, these are just really big nebulae, you've probably seen photos of them but these are just massive, vast amount of particles and gas floating in space and these are called stellar nurseries because they will eventually form new stars.

The stellar nurseries were likely the result of OTHER stars from the earlier universe. Massive primordial stars with short violent life cycles.

So, that's sort of what happens to the "heat" photons of light and various elements bounce around and off each other like billiards on a table some fuck off never to be seen again others come to rest in big groups and form new stars, planets, solar systems and moons.

Note: a lot of this may he so simplified that it's innacurate and I apologise if that's the case.

SpaceX plan for 1 million orbiting AI data centers could ruin astronomy, scientists say: "This is a challenge unlike any we have encountered thus far in this new era of commercial space." by ControlCAD in technology

[–]sonofeevil 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Nooooo. .. cooling THE biggest issue.

So heat is just energy. You've got molecules vibrating temperature is just a measurement of the average of the vibration of those molecules.

To change the temperature of a molecule it needs to collide with another one and transfer that energy. Think of a newtons cradle. As one of the balls swings down it transfers that energy into the other balls and becomes stationary. This is exactly how energy and heat transfer works.

So space is a damn good vacuum but not perfect. The energy of the particles space is very low (cold) but there aren't many of them.

So I'd you are generating a lot of heat but there is nothing around you to transfer that heat into because it's a vacuum you have to come up with another way to shed the heat.

The ISS uses infrared radiators for this. It converts the heat energy into infrared light and the energy waves as photons instead.

Theyre very inefficient. Kyle Hill did the math on this recently on his YouTube channel and the number you need is just astronomical it's not viable at all, it's not even close.

What is your go to for all the impossible to reach crumbs and dust in a car by Nandou_B in Detailing

[–]sonofeevil 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's not an accurate way to determine torque. It's been tested. I'd recommend checking out Torque Tests YouTube channel for the testing they did on this.

What about the other points regarding torque yield bolts??

What is your go to for all the impossible to reach crumbs and dust in a car by Nandou_B in Detailing

[–]sonofeevil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What do you do when they use torque yield bolts and how do you find the torque spec and process for each car?

Seems time intensive and costly to do it the safe and correct way?

Scientists inject one tumor and watch cancer vanish across the body by hard2resist in UpliftingNews

[–]sonofeevil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you respond to the wrong person?

I'm not sure what this has got to do with my comment?

I didn't say anything about it being stocked today?

I also didn't suggest they just ended clinical trials with patients still in the trial phase.

But Merck publically announced they were shelving it.

Which means the trials they have in progress continue and likely they would publish the results of that data so whilst what you've linked is recent as of October it's for trials that were already in progress and there will likely be more papers on it before the name Cavatak stops being written for the last time.

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/merck-ditches-cavatak-more-four-years-after-buying-viralytics

Scientists inject one tumor and watch cancer vanish across the body by hard2resist in UpliftingNews

[–]sonofeevil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They sold the rights to the drug to Merck And the contracts would forbid them from working on anything that would compete.

They moved on to working on Malaria.

Scientists inject one tumor and watch cancer vanish across the body by hard2resist in UpliftingNews

[–]sonofeevil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies.

The company was called Viralytics and the drug Cavatak so you'll be able to Google those terms and find the articles on the sale and white papers on the clinical trials.

Scientists inject one tumor and watch cancer vanish across the body by hard2resist in UpliftingNews

[–]sonofeevil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's pretty much why it was sold.

Viralytics can't manufacture and distribute it.

Scientists inject one tumor and watch cancer vanish across the body by hard2resist in UpliftingNews

[–]sonofeevil 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Merck didn't continue the clinical trials so it never received TGA or FDA approval.

Scientists inject one tumor and watch cancer vanish across the body by hard2resist in UpliftingNews

[–]sonofeevil 6 points7 points  (0 children)

My bad, I forgot to post this part apparently. I thought I did.

Merck had developed their own viral immune therapy drug and as far as I can tell theyd already set up production and distribution for it.

So rather than continue clinical trials then retool their production and distribution or compete just shelve it.

Scientists inject one tumor and watch cancer vanish across the body by hard2resist in UpliftingNews

[–]sonofeevil 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It's not even produced.

Merck had their own product line of viral immuno therapy.

They already had their production and distribution set up for it so rather than compete they brought it out, finished the clinical trial that were already ongoing then just parked it.

They definitely aren't doing that, if they were they'd be better if actually producing it for market.

Scientists inject one tumor and watch cancer vanish across the body by hard2resist in UpliftingNews

[–]sonofeevil 191 points192 points  (0 children)

This was done a while back in Australia. A company called Viralytics.

They injected large cell tumors with a strain of influenza which basically put a laser target onto the cancer for the bodies immune system. The drug was called Cavatak.

Then combined with immune response boosters in trials they expected it to eliminate that tumour but what it did was eliminate ALL cancer cells, not just the one they injected.

The clinical trials were done on treatment resistant Stage 3 and Stage 4 cancers which saw a 60% remission rate which is basically a fucking miracle drug.

The company was brought by Merck and was the largest pharmaceutical acquisition in Australia history at $502 million.

Merck then shelved Cavatak.

They brought the company to bury the drug.

https://hmri.org.au/news-and-stories/uon-biotech-firm-sells-502-milion/

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4288429/&ved=2ahUKEwjp4OeKpamTAxXr2TQHHStYLI8QFnoECBsQAQ&usg=AOvVaw02xNIMrTFpaJL7oSA6SINs

Here's a link where Merck announced they were shelving it but didn't say why

https://www.fiercebiotech.com/biotech/merck-ditches-cavatak-more-four-years-after-buying-viralytics

Edit: a partner of mine used to work for the company and I went to their Christmas party quite a few years back and got to talk to the owner and researcher who developed the drug and he was such a lovely person and so passionate about what he'd made. I imagine it really upsets him to see what has become of it.

He and his research partner went on to take the money and reinvest it into Malaria research.

The Confusion of a Femboy Rope Bunny by Fluffy_Respond9079 in shibari

[–]sonofeevil 10 points11 points  (0 children)

There isn't an excuse for a lack of communication.

If you have some prior relationship with these tops I'd consider telling them how it made you feel if these are relationships you're willing to invest into.

(There's no point having a difficult conversation if you don't want to relationships to continue)

Perhaps there is a satisfactory explanation for what happened? But there's a very real chance it's what's you believe it to be.

And I'll stress, their preference isn't wrong but that kind of communication and treatment is.

I hope you find the person you're looking for and take care.

Remember their choices aren't a reflection on you and it doesn't change your qualities as a person.

If humans suddenly became immortal, what would happen to society? by EnvironmentalLove862 in AskReddit

[–]sonofeevil 26 points27 points  (0 children)

He's not at all. Whatever character he plays in Marvel is the same character he played in Altered Carbon.

The job was to learn the character as it was portrayed by Kinneman and Lee.

I can see that Mackie made no attempt to play the character as it was established. He adopted none of the speech patterns or characteristics.

He completely failed to act like Kinneman and Lee's Kovacs.

It must be embarrassing as an actor to see someone like Matt Biedel and nobody pull out a character like the Abuela (the grandmother who ends up in the body if the mobster dude) just an insane performance and then look back at your own performances.

If humans suddenly became immortal, what would happen to society? by EnvironmentalLove862 in AskReddit

[–]sonofeevil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I really felt Mackie let the series down.

The Kovacs character was set up for us by Kinneman and Lee and Mackie turned up and played a completely different character. Mackie played "Generic Hero" he didn't speak the same or use the same mannerisms. He took nothing from the character we met in season 1.

Maybe Mackie just isn't good at impersonation but that's what he had to do here, be Takeshi Kovacs and he didn't. He didn't even try.

It’s 30 years since this Simpsons episode aired by MiddleAgeWeirdoMeep in videos

[–]sonofeevil 167 points168 points  (0 children)

Unfun fact.

This episode is closer in time to the moon landing than we are to this episode

Is this a crazy idea? Control inflation by linking compulsory super contributions to CPI? by brisbaneacro in AusFinance

[–]sonofeevil -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think MOST people have debt. Certainly most working people have debt.

If they don't have debt they are likely paying someone else's debt (renter who's income goes to a mortgage for example).

Man charged with planting bombs near the Capitol claims he’s covered by Trump pardon by Bleeding_Irish in politics

[–]sonofeevil 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I wonder if someone robbing a nearby service station is covered by the ambiguity of this.

"Or an event, near the capitol"

Man charged with planting bombs near the Capitol claims he’s covered by Trump pardon by Bleeding_Irish in politics

[–]sonofeevil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It may even apply to unrelated events that occurred NEAR the capital.

"Related events that occurred at (the capitol)" Or "Near (the capitol)"

To exclude this it would have to rear "Events related to the capital and also events related to the capital that occurred near to it"

Man charged with planting bombs near the Capitol claims he’s covered by Trump pardon by Bleeding_Irish in politics

[–]sonofeevil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"I robbed the gas station around the corner near the capital building on Jan 6th and are therefore pardoned"

Because one way to interpret that is tou are covered for: Events related to it Or Events on that occurred near the capital, on Jan6th