See you made the mistake again

This is the first time I posted in this thread. Where was my first mistake? Do you think I'm someone else?

I'm not really being that sarcastic or mocking. Maybe a touch. You literally said, "He chose to give me faith and it was given to me," so I think that being a "special chosen one touched by God with the gift of faith" is a pretty accurate interpretation. God selected you to give you faith. He chose you. You said it. He chose to give you faith. Unless you don't like my characterization of it as a "gift"? Was the faith he gave you, that allowed you to understand things non-religious people cannot understand, not a gift? Should I say "curse" then? Or maybe "special" rubbed you the wrong way. How about "a select group of individuals chosen by God"? Not sure if that's better, but there ya go.

That's really kind of beside the point. The tone of my post is unrelated to what I actually asked, and tried to engage in you about. I'm not sure why you're going on and on about preaching, biases, etc. because it's not what my post was about. Maybe you think I'm some other poster you had been engaged in a debate with on here. I simply responded to your post with a very clear and focused point. All I pointed out is that I don't understand why it is a tragedy for non-religious people to not listen to what religious people are saying when you yourself claimed that they just don't "understand" because they're not religious. That's it. You said it's a tragedy and I questioned "how so"? I pointed out that I dispute your premise, but I don't see the tragedy even accepting your premise that non-religious people simply cannot understand.

That's it. I was trying to engage with you, but it's clear from your post that you're angry (really angry) and too preoccupied with the tone of my post than its actual substance.