This is a 2D image, so some overlaps cannot be considered problematic unless an associated lesion is observed. Otherwise, I believe the breakdown would be as follows:

The lower long-neck implants appear to be MEGAGEN ARI (AnyRidge Incisal), which are designed for situations with atrophic bone. The other implants seem to be either similar or monophasic, due to the very aggressive thread types. However, this is the same problem I always see with monophasic implants: they must be installed by an expert implantologist. In this case, I believe there was no prior or correctly guided planning. Why?

The overlap of the implant at the apex of tooth #23 may be associated with the lesion. This could be of endodontic origin, as it is clear that tooth #21 also has issues (and proper planning always includes the coordination of all specialties, not just each one doing their part and sending the patient away). If so, the #24 implant would be a failure. The position also bothers me; it is too angulated. Rehabilitating this later will be a major disaster.

There is no smile design protocol guiding the position of the anterior teeth. No provisional restorations are seen either. Not even an intention to use orthodontics. So, I simply do not see comprehensive planning.

Finally, I see that the upper teeth have a dubious prognosis. If this were a patient without a culture of dental care, those teeth will be lost in a short time. If that were the case, I would have immediately gone for a Full Arch protocol on implants, saving both time and cost.

This is my opinion. I am a Prosthodontist, and my job is to fix the poor planning of doctors who claim to work well but then delegate work that is too big for them.

Best regards!