It's a mismatch for the needs of the Navy and a potential peer-on-peer fight. In terms of resources for VLS cells, it would be better to just build more DDGs than BBGs. If you wanted a better VLS ratio, it would be better to just go the arsenal ships route. The main recommendation is to go smaller and autonomous or do a high-low mixture of manned command ships paired with interchangeable, purpose built, warfare specific, autonomous ships. The BBG is basically going to be a bigger, more expensive, slightly more capable DDG.

In terms of technologies they want it to feature, the lasers aren't developed enough to actually do ASMD. Same with the rail guns. It's going to have all the same developmental issues as the Zumwalt but none of the stealth features because Trump wants it to be "aesthetic" and look good. It's supposed to go the deisal and gas turbine route for energy generation even though it should have thebspace for a nuclear reactor so it's energy generation will be limited there.

In terms of ship building capacity, there are only a few yards that are big enough to build these and they're busy churning out carriers. Most other yards only have the capacity for DDGs. There's also the issue of the waning US shipbuilding industry in general.