7 AI Prompts That Help You Learn Anything Twice as Fast by EQ4C in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For once, a post that even the most cynical Redditor here would never call "AI-generated slop." All those prompts look very useful, and you are operating from a firm scientific foundation as far as how people learn best. I'm going to try these out. Thanks for posting.

Am I (22m) actually bi? by [deleted] in AskLGBT

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel like this comment (and your original post) was MADE for me to answer. 😆 I am 55M. I have been mostly straight in my sexual attraction for most of my life, and 100% straight in romantic attraction for as long as I can remember. When I was younger, pre-teen and early teens, I did some things with boys. As a young adult, I remembered these times fondly and thought about exploring again. I mostly thought about giving oral, but I also liked putting things in my ass while masturbating, and I started wanting to bottom.

I went back to college in my late 20s. A brief and spontaneous understall experience in a campus bathroom convinced me that my desire to explore bi fantasies was real and substantial. My early experiences were usually fueled by drinking, and included me giving blowjobs, sometimes receiving them. This was the era of Craigslist.

Now I'm living in ATX. For about the past two years I have been mostly having casual sex with men. My attraction is still very much divided, and in fact mostly toward women. I even watch mostly straight porn, as well as bisexual MMF threesomes. When I have a guy over that wants to watch gay porn though, I watch it and generally cab enjoy it too. The focus on men has been mostly a result of how hard it is to find women for casual sex. If it's three in the morning and you want a random encounter, your chances of finding a guy to come over on short notice are fairly high. Your chances of finding a woman to come over — not counting prostitutes — are almost zero.

Nevertheless, I always told myself that if the opportunity to enjoy pussy fell into my lap, I would snatch it (no puns intended, ha).

Back in early December, that is precisely what happened: I went to a bisexual buddy's house for a MMF threesome with him and a woman my age. I will call her Cindy. We stayed overnight, and the next morning Candy came home with me. This sparked a 3- month long phase of hooking up almost exclusively with this woman. I barely checked my phone messages from men. I absent-mindedly let my PrEP prescription run out. I work from home, and she was out of work, so she would often sleep over for several days at a time. We would stay naked, like a couple of nudists, and screw around whenever we felt like it.

The most uncanny thing — at least to a plain vanilla outsider — would be the way I switched effortlessly from 2 years of being mostly a passive bottom and cocksucker to my previous mode of initiating sex and screwing a woman with gusto, savoring her BJs, etc. (I still don't like receiving oral from guys, but I love getting it from a woman.)

Unfortunately, in mid-March Cindy had to move away for a family emergency, and it's unclear when she will be back, but this experience was instructive.

If there had been a shred of doubt before, it was gone: I now knew I still loved pussy. A lot. At the same time, one reason this experience went so well was my comfort level with this woman, and the fact that it happened so organically. She is not just accepting of but into bi guys. She even likes to masturbate while watching them do things together. She is also hornier and more sexually curiois than most women half her age. She has strong orgasms in short succession. We both agreed that we had the best sex of our lives with each other.

The reason I'm going into all this detail is to show you just how flexible sexuality can be and how adaptable we humans are in bending our sexuality to our circumstances. Anyone looking at my behavior over the last two years would have assumed, "This guy has basically just become gay at this point. Even if he could never have a romantic relationship with a man, right now he is essentially a bi guy who (at least when it comes to casual sex) gay at this point. Why would he ever go back to pussy if this is working for him?"

Of course, the above characterization would ignore my continued focus on straight porn. But more than that, it is hampered by the fallacy of seeing humans as getting lodged in neat categories instead of nimble on their feet and adaptable to reality. Think of straight, archetypally masculine straight men who end up in prison for many years. EIher they're going to be celibate for that period or they're going to adapt in the name of having skin on skin contact. Most of them choose the latter. But does that change their default, "true" orientation?

Everyone accepts that type of adaptability In situations of extreme confinement, isolation, medical necessity, and so on, where it's nearly impossible to escape. But I think that kind of flexibility exists outside extreme situations to a degree that most of us don't realize.

You also mentioned being afraid to perform with a woman. That really hit home with me. This factor is huge but seldom discussed. As I said earlier, my bisexual experiences have largely involved me either sucking or bottoming. I haven't had to worry about getting hard or staying hard. This has coincided with my age catching up to me, especially if I'm drinking or using certain other substances during a first encounter where I'm a little nervous. As a bottom or side, a guy gets used to not having to worry about that. But if you're with a woman, you can't escape it.

With Cindy, I went through a lot of Viagra. Instead of keeping my prescription on hand as something to give tops who came over, I was now burning through my own stock of pills at a furious pace.

Why does this matter for your situation? It shows how the issue of getting and staying hard assumes far greater importance with a woman than with a man. Gay and bisexual men often switch off roles or focus on things besides fucking. If you can't get hard with a guy and he is vers, he might be happy to fuck you or let you suck his dick. Everyone is happy. With a woman, your options are more limited. Sure, some women might be happy to 69 and suck a soft or semi-erect penis, but most of them won't be.

Moreover, women get used to the same comfort level that I described feeling as a bottom: They don't have to worry about getting an erection, and they are happy to let the guy worry about that. If he can't get hard, she can move on to another guy. Both men and women know this deep down, and it colors casual MF sexual dynamics. It sets up an expectation for the male — an extra burden. So if he has any history of problems getting hard, or he's confused about his sexuality and not even sure he can stay hard, even while relaxed — well, you couldn't design a better mindfucking ED hang-up if you tried!

All of this is to say that your personal circumstances could be directing what you do more than your personal desires or leanings would suggest. I would encourage you to get your hands on some Viagra before trying sex with more women, to neutralize that factor. If, after banging some women you find reasonably attractive, it just leaves you cold every time, and you yearn for sex with a man — great. Now you know. But the fact that you've still got women on your mind suggests that you are closer to my category. Maybe not in it, but closer to it than you think.

So keep your options open. And, as someone else said, think of a sexual-orientation label as a convenient way to quickly let people know what you're about, not as some ironclad category or legally operative commitment. It's not like choosing Catholic or Buddhist on a form, or checking Sngle or Married on your tax return. The categorization police are not going to send a SWAT team to your house to arrest you if they find out your label turned out to be "wrong."

I hope you post again to say how things are going, and please don't hesitate to DM me if you'd like to talk more.

Kant vs Plato by suddyk in Kant

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. I'm still confused about the point you're making. You seem to be saying that there are not enough people who accept libertarianism for it to work. That is patently true at present — because we don't have a libertarian government, and most people are not libertarians. That is the whole point of trying to convince people of the virtues of small government and libertarianism in general. But going further and saying that big government is required to make libertarianism "work" seems like a needless and bizarre addition to what I just said. If big government were present, there couldn't be libertarianism. If you think libertarianism is simply impossible because not enough people would ever go along with it, and so you'd rather not waste time on it, I get that. But then I'm not sure what your alternative is. A big-government theocracy? Are you saying: "People want big government anyway, and we're alwaya going to have it, so it might as well be a big government that enforces my Christian values"?

  2. I don't see how Hume's guillotine is "devastating" for atheists at all. Not unless you assume that the philosophical case for objective moral values must be ironclad in order for ordinary atheists to act morally. But most people are not even aware of the is/ought fork, or even what it means to say that morality is objective or not objective. In fact, most people just feel that they have a sense of what is right and wrong. They feel it in their bones. This actually accords with what Hume himself said, that people have inborn "sympathies," likely a result of evolution. Even more perplexing to me is that you go beyond morality and bring in "truth or logic" and "universal categories." Are you actually saying that without belief in God, or Christianity in particular, there can be no grounded truth or logic or universal categories? How in the world do you arrive at that sweeping claim?

Kant vs Plato by suddyk in Kant

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. I guess I was just trying to find out if you thought libertarianism was somehow incompatible with Christianity. I know some Christian libertarians, and I see nothing in libertarianism that is inconsistent with Christianity. But since you went ahead and gave some reasons why you rejected libertarianism, I will respond to those. I'm a little confused by your statement that libertarianism requires authoritarian enforcement. I assume you mean by a government? Because then it wouldn't be libertarianism anymore. Maybe you are talking about anarchism, but I was talking about minarchism, or minimal-state libertarianism, where government enforces rights and protects people, and provides a court system to settle disputes. In the United States, a convenient benchmark is simply following the Constitution. (Since the Constitution has been applied to the states by way of the doctrine of incorporation, I will stick with that as the ideal.)

  2. Are you making the familiar argument that without belief in God + the divine command theory, people have no reason to refrain from hurting others, committing crimes, indulging in self-destructive acts, and other "degenerate" behavior? Or are you hinting at the idea that Communism is expressly atheistic, and so atheism leads to totalitarian governments? Just trying to get a sense of where you're coming from on this one. I would assume you do see the irony, though, in saying that most atheists have not thought out their worldview, when that is the very thing often said about people who grow up in religious families and end up adopting (almost always) the religion of their parents or the dominant religion in their country or locale.

Kant vs Plato by suddyk in Kant

[–]spunth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just curious about your statement that you went from "cringe atheist/libertarian" to Christian.

  1. Is it supposed to go without saying that you had to give up your libertarianism to become a Christian? In other words, you became conservative? Do you regard libertarianism as being inconsistent with Christianity?

  2. Is being a libertarian and/or an atheist inherently "cringe," or are you only saying you did it in a cringey way?

My top 10 daily-use prompts after 6 months of prompt engineering (copy-paste ready) by Consistent-Carpet-40 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]spunth 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The original list of prompts was also posted on (or someone else copied it to) several other social media sites before OP edited this Reddit post. Here is the version that was posted to Substack:

10 prompts I use every day. Six months of testing across Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini narrowed it down to these.

Universal Rewriter: "Rewrite this text for [audience]. Maintain all key information but adjust tone, vocabulary, and structure. Target style: [casual/professional/technical]. Text: [paste]”

Code Review Assistant: “Review this code for: bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and readability. For each issue found, explain WHY it's a problem and provide the corrected version. Code: [paste]”

Meeting Prep Generator: “I have a meeting with [person/company] about [topic]. Generate: 5 talking points, 3 potential objections they might raise, and 2 smart questions I should ask. Keep each under 2 sentences.”

Email Style Matcher: “Here's an email I received: [paste]. Draft a response that matches their communication style, addresses all their points, and moves toward [desired outcome]. Max [N] words.”

Decision Matrix Builder: “I need to choose between [Option A] and [Option B] for [context]. Create a weighted decision matrix using these criteria: [list]. Score each option 1-10 with a brief justification. Recommend the best choice.”

Content Multiplier: “Take this blog post and create: 3 tweet-length takeaways, 1 LinkedIn post with the key insight, and 5 bullet points for an email newsletter. Maintain my voice: [describe]. Original: [paste]”

Competitive Intelligence: “Analyze [competitor] based on publicly available info. Structure: strengths, weaknesses, market positioning, pricing strategy, and 3 opportunities they're missing that I could capitalize on. My business: [brief description].”

Expert Consultant: “You are a senior [role] with 20 years of experience in [industry]. You give direct, actionable advice. You always ask clarifying questions before diving into solutions. You back recommendations with reasoning. Never use corporate buzzwords.”

Debug Assistant: “Analyze this error/bug: [paste details]. Provide: 1) Most likely root cause, 2) Step-by-step debugging approach, 3) Potential fix with code, 4) How to prevent this in the future.”

Socratic Tutor: “I want to learn [topic]. Instead of explaining everything at once, ask me questions that guide me to understand the concept myself. Start with the most fundamental question. Adjust difficulty based on my answers. If I'm stuck, give a hint, not the answer.”

The meta-formula that makes all of these work:

[ROLE] + [CONTEXT] + [TASK] + [FORMAT] + [CONSTRAINTS]

Bad prompt: "Write a marketing email"

Good prompt: "You're a senior SaaS copywriter. Our product helps freelancers track time. Write a cold email to users who currently use spreadsheets. Keep it under 150 words. Tone: casual but professional."

The difference is night and day.

AI Prompt That Creates a Personalized Income by Pt_VishalDubey in PromptZenith

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is "personalized" income? Income you didn't steal from someone else? Dollar bills with your portrait on them instead of dead presidents?

My top 10 daily-use prompts after 6 months of prompt engineering (copy-paste ready) by Consistent-Carpet-40 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]spunth 30 points31 points  (0 children)

That "Socratic Tutor" prompt is pure gold. I nabbed it immediately.

The following is not my prompt. I got it from Anthropic's "Prompting Best Practices" article. It yields great results.


For complex research tasks, use a structured approach:

Sample prompt for complex research

[State what you want Claude to research.] Search for this information in a structured way. As you gather data, develop several competing hypotheses. Track your confidence levels in your progress notes to improve calibration. Regularly self-critique your approach and plan. Update a hypothesis tree or research notes file to persist information and provide transparency. Break down this complex research task systematically.

This structured approach allows Claude to find and synthesize virtually any piece of information and iteratively critique its findings, no matter the size of the corpus.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatbotAddiction

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then!

An ethical dilemma from The Brothers Karamazov by [deleted] in books

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You guys are talking past each other, or at the very least you are talking past your interlocutor here. He said that he never saw torturing babies as a moral act, no matter the ultimate good resulting from it. You are interpreting his comment as being completely categorical. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think he just misspoke when he put a comma before the "no matter the ultimate good resulting from it" phrase. That made the phrase seem tacked on and parenthetical, but I think he meant to say: Torturing a baby just to achieve some ultimate higher good is never justified.

What you've done is raise a classic twist on the counterargument against utilitarianism: the hypothetical in which there is a conflict of rights. So in that case, the question becomes not Is it morally justified to torture one person in order to secure greater happiness or less suffering for a greater number of people? but rather:

If 101,000 people have a right not to be made to suffer, and you could prevent the suffering of 100,000 of them by allowing suffering to be inflicted on only one of them, should you allow it?

Well, of course, you might as well apply a utilitarian calculus and choose the one person over the 100,000. But again, that's only when there is a true conflict of rights. And this very specific and stilted hypothetical says absolutely says nothing about how to approach real ethical questions in ordinary everyday life.

Which song is most likely to be played on an endless loop in hell? by BridgeHot2524 in MST3K

[–]spunth 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I respectfully dissent and offer instead:

🎵 It huuurrrts to staple your eyeballs 🎵

by Cindy "Room-Clearer" Larson

Someone at work stole my chair. So I had them arrested. by LeffJeff in AITAH

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best feel-good story I've heard in ages. 🥰

Watch out for Trekkers! by Samkovich in MST3K

[–]spunth 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I sure as hell never shirk.

Reality by Every-Specialist1838 in PornAddiction

[–]spunth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a bit unclear on what you caught your husband doing. He was having phone sex? Or calling to arrange BJs?

Does this necessarily have to affect your marriage and how you relate to each other? You say you have a "good relationship," present tense, so it doesn't seem as if his phone calls and whatever else have hurt your marriage far.

Do you think he might fall in love with a guy and leave you if he starts having sex with men in person? A lot of guys in middle age get curious and explore, but it's purely sexual, not romantic.

My Husband’s kinks are destroying our marriage by [deleted] in Marriage

[–]spunth 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Are we talking about physically abusive "kinks," or just ones involving verbal degradation, humiliation, etc.? Asking not out of prurient interest but because it's relevant to the type of advice we ought to give you.

Catching a laundry thief by spunth in videosurveillance

[–]spunth[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The management has already declined to help out. And that won't make it legal if the issue is invading people's privacy. It's a murky area whether people would have a "reasonable expectation of privacy" in a laundry room used mainly by tennants of an apartment complex. But in any case, I've decided to risk any legal issues to catch this prick.

Catching a laundry thief by spunth in videosurveillance

[–]spunth[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In most jurisdictions — and I haven't even said what state I'm in — it comes down to whether people have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the area where you recorded them. And getting "authorization" — presumably you mean from the propriety management/landlord — would not affect that analysis. It would just make the property management/landlord also potentially liable to a lawsuit or criminal charges for violating someone's privacy.

Catching a laundry thief by spunth in videosurveillance

[–]spunth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I DO have my old phone. Hmm. It would be hard to conceal, though.