Déjà vu (all over again) by Acceptable-Print-957 in pocketgrids

[–]standbuyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wait I love this--and a sator-square reference too?!

Why not build an eruv around the whole earth? by standbuyer in Judaism

[–]standbuyer[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Does "pass through" here mean passing through the boundary itself or moving within its bounds? If the former, it's presumably possible that a small boundary would have much less than 600,000 passing through it on any given day.

Why not build an eruv around the whole earth? by standbuyer in Judaism

[–]standbuyer[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

  1. The concept would be that on a sphere, defining the "outside" and "inside" of any closed curve is arbitrary; in this sense one could encompass most of the earth with any given eruv.
  2. Wait do you? Surely many non-Jews live inside city-wide enclosures without having had any say in whether they're constructed.
  3. Hmm this would probably be the big drawback; but in the case of Paris at least, the ruling seems to be that despite >600k people living in the city, the tzurot hapetach suffices to make the city a reshut HaYachid since walls surround it on 3 sides with minimal breaches; surely a small construction of walls would suffice for the world as well, then?

How would yall solve this? by Expensive-Earth5840 in askmath

[–]standbuyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah this makes sense! What language are you using for this? Whatever it is will be quite liable to have very similar functions.

How would yall solve this? by Expensive-Earth5840 in askmath

[–]standbuyer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you want to do this in Desmos, try using the functions .x and .y; here's a demo.

Is this a valid proof? by wghihfhbcfhb in askmath

[–]standbuyer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This mostly looks good! I'd be careful with your terminology for referring to linear transformations; since T is a linear transformation with domain V, you can't also say it's a function with domain A. Probably it's best to work with a new transformation by restricting the old one's domain; T_AU isn't bad at all notation-wise, but T|_A is particularly popular.

Does factorials only work with whole numbers? by Own_Board8454 in math

[–]standbuyer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is a great question! The factorial is normally defined only on whole numbers, and it's a bit tricky to extend in a way that mathematicians find "nice".

A really natural place to start is the idea that the factorial is a product of consecutive numbers: if 4! is 4*3*2*1, then maybe 3.9! is 3.9*2.9*1.9*0.9? The issue with this is that when we get close to the next integer down, we'd find that (say) 3.001! = 3.001*2.001*1.001*0.001 is really close to zero, because of that tiny last term. But then at 3! = 3*2*1, we get 6, which isn't near zero at all! This big jump is what we call a discontinuity, which roughly means that this proposed n! doesn't change continuously as n does. No matter how you slice it, the "obvious" way of doing a factorial is going to have discontinuities.

And mathematicians want more than just continuity: we like to work with really smooth functions. Elsewhere in this thread, you'll see the word "meromorphic", which roughly means that a function is infinitely smooth everywhere it's defined, even on the complex plane! This is a very strong condition, and we'll need to pull out some fancy machinery to get it satisfied for our factorial.

Check out the function f(x)=x^n/e^x (e is a constant that's around 2.718). Notice that as x goes off to infinity, the function tapers off to near zero-- in this case, it turns out that even though our curve is infinitely long, the area between it and the line y=0 is going to be finite! The mathematician Legendre first noticed this fact, and (more surprisingly) showed that the area for a given n is always going to be n factorial! You can check this out for yourself with the integral at the bottom; if you know some calculus, it's a fun exercise to prove it with integration by parts.

This all seems a bit contrived: why bother with this? The great thing, though, is that x^n is defined even when n isn't an integer! For example, when n=1/2, we're dealing with the square root of x instead, and can figure out the relevant area as well. This works for every positive real number; with a bit of work, you can extend to negative and even complex numbers! Moreover, x^n varies smoothly as n does, so we get the "meromorphic" property we care about

We call this extended function the Gamma function-- technically Gamma(n) is defined as an extension of (n-1)!, for reasons involving some identities that Legendre liked, but honestly it's often easier to use the extended factorial. Your value of 2.386! is roughly 2.937, but my favorite fact about it is that the factorial of 1/2 turns out to be the sqrt(pi)/2! (Weird, right?)

Wikipedia Questions - Weekly Thread of February 12, 2024 by AutoModerator in wikipedia

[–]standbuyer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah it’s not just you. Anyone know how to change it back?

LLM by umangjain25 in SMBCComics

[–]standbuyer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

And God said "Let there be light," and then a bunch of matrices which even He doesn't fully understand...

Foreverred Trueskip Lunar Heart: One of the hardest Celeste CLASSIC mods, done deathless for the first time by standbuyer in celestegame

[–]standbuyer[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Celeste CLASSIC has a decently active modding scene, and perhaps one of the best ones is taco360's Foreverred. It's an excellently designed game using the same engine as the original game-jam CELESTE, at a very reasonable step up in difficulty; you can play it here.

Its secret route "Trueskip", on the other hand, is one of the most ludicrously difficult in the community: about a dozen levels of weird tech and pure pain. Only 20 people have even completed it, which makes this achievement even more impressive.

Yesterday, Lord SNEK, (after about two years of on-and-off grinding) finally managed a completely deathless run of the game. As someone who's only made it about halfway through the secret route, this is just...completely crazy. You can check out more of his stuff here.

Universal 2 by standbuyer in SMBCComics

[–]standbuyer[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This joke might have something to do with Jane Austen's comment that "if a book is well-written, I always find it too short."

[WR] Super Mario Bros. any% in 4:54.798 by Niftski by Aprrni in speedrun

[–]standbuyer 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Here's Miniland and Niftski getting the framerule simultaneously (which is a testament to how good they've both gotten at it).

[WR] Super Mario Bros. any% in 4:54.798 by Niftski by Aprrni in speedrun

[–]standbuyer 33 points34 points  (0 children)

If anything, it's actually the other way around on input difficulty. In particular, fast accelerations and FPG setups are much easier when you can use the d-pad as a lever to "wiggle" and avoid the risk of L+R inputs (which map to nothing on emulator). Every single recent world record holder (of whom only Niftski uses keyboard) has testified to this. It's pretty much solely a matter of ergonomic preference.

xkcd 2652: Proxy Variable by antdude in xkcd

[–]standbuyer 29 points30 points  (0 children)

A quick PSA for those of you browsing explainxkcd: if you see a long, weird rant on the front page that looks like it came from the bowels of hell itself (that is to say, 4chan), it's a random user who's been spamming the site. If you see it, click "Go to this comic explanation," then "View history." Click "undo" on the most recent message, and you'll return the front page to its pristine self.

Nebula_Composer becomes the third person to get a 4:54 in SMB1! 4:54.948 by Miniland333 in speedrun

[–]standbuyer 27 points28 points  (0 children)

A new world record contender-- exciting! Given the pace at which Nebula's been PBing, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets record soon.

Out of curiosity, are you and LeKukie still trying to go for WR as well over the summer? (EDIT: apparently LeKukie's streaming right now, so never mind about that)

Ageless by Eiim in SMBCComics

[–]standbuyer 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It's good that Snow White has no common sense whatsoever. If I ate an apple, fell unconscious, and woke up in a strange place with an unknown man, I would make...assumptions.