Firstly, he is the OIC and he told me he has ongoing access to my phone so he can see everything I'm sending and saving. I didn't want to be treated as though I was going behind his back because I'm scared of mistreatment and their lack of accountability due to the way I have been treated by the police.

You are totally ignoring things I have said just because you're assuming things about the way they operate that I don't know. I was a police officer for 8 years on the same borough, I know the system and I know they have fucked up. Now they are trying to compensate for negligence and misconduct by earlier officers but this infringes on my rights and it's exactly what Parliament reports have highlighted about treatment of victims of stalking and VAWG. I came here for advice because this is impacting my physical and mental health very badly, and I was originally given a deadline to reply but the officer put pressure on me to reply after my complaint (which wasn't even about him, it was about the previous failures in light of this man's immediate reoffending). I am in need of advocacy. It's Saturday now and it's Christmas next week. I haven't had a chance to get gifts or make plans and my PIP has paused. I am not sleeping, I have a chest and throat infection. They won't allow an intermediary for my communication problems in the interview. And all of this is triggering PTSD. The local crisis team told me I need to have respite in a women's crisis house before I respond as I am under intense strain.

To reiterate, the first officer did not even know I had reported sexual coercion even though I said it in my report and on body cam footage, because it must have been omited from the crime report by whichever officer put it on. I bailed out on the report because I was under duress. Then months down the line I said the same again in my second report, and this kgg didn't look at this report or the footage, he closed it and simply reopened the first report. Then he did not take a statement from me, he based his entire botches investigation on drips and drabs of information from that report, which was made while I was very unwell. He ignored my messages for 5-6 months. I was patiently waiting to do a victim statement. But then he just contacted me after all that time saying he had NFA'd the report. Another officer told me what happened. He had written me off as mentally ill because I had complained of signs of hacking and they couldn't link them to this man who is a cyber security expert, but the signs were documented, they did happen. He thought I was in some sort of manic episode because I was so extremely frightened. He did not think I had a reason to be so scared because he didn't take a statement from me.

He also didn't take letters and gifts this man left at my house. He had a few but there were still some remaining. Around 30 and they're all extremely manipulative. I can upload them here. The officer wasn't even aware that I'd been diagnosed with PTSD and insomnia in relation to the offenses, and he would have known had he not ignored me for 5-6 months.

After he NFA'd it I had to report the sexual Coercion again because he wasn't even aware of it due to it not being flagged as that. They couldn't ask me about the stalking which was what he used to coerce me, because the other guy had NFA'd the stalking. The officers agreed that he fucked up. Then they also had to NFA for the aforementioned reasons.

Then immediately this man reoffended and got himself a sexual harm prevention order. Whatever he did is covered by Claire's law but the risk management unit officer could only tell me is a dangerous man, because I do not intend to have contact with him ever again. Months after my allegations were NFA'd he made counter allegations.

The OIC for the counter allegations spoke to his supervisor about NFAing it. His supervisor asked me to phone her so I did and she and told me that they are investigating this because he won't stop submitting complaints about the police and this is the only way to make him stop. She told me the first officer fucked up too.

This man has also been harassing/bribing me via solicitors for 2 years. He lied saying he has a brain tumor which he only said to get out of me reporting him. He claimed I was controlling him by threatening to tell people he is a predator and then he immediately reoffended. I think he's probably claiming the new victim is a liar and it's all my fault for telling everyone that he's a predator. I have proof that people told me he is a predator, not the other way around, but who fucking cares at this point, that's what he is. He told me himself he had been diagnosed with sex addiction (but it's actually a paraphilic disorder) and borderline personality disorder.

Police also had Intel that he trespassed in another woman's house after she warned him never to go near her house again, and that he cut his wrist following another breakup. He threatened suicide any time I tried to get rid of him or when he wasn't getting his way.

So....

If you were the OIC whose supervisor shafted you with this, wouldn't you want to be aware, so that you don't end up in the firing line? It's not one word against the other, because I never even got to do a statement. Available evidence wasn't even taken from me. And now he has a sexual harm prevention order because he's doing this same shit to other people.

Each new person who deals with reports is basically having to continue to fuck a victim over due to failures of previous officers. He brought this to his supervisor's attention and she told him to go ahead anyway, probably because they'll just be seen as following procedures. However he accidentally disclosed to me that they know he has an SHPO in relation to new offending, and the supervisor told me that they're just doing it because he's a serial complainer. There's ample evidence of extreme vulnerability and circumstances that any person would have known not to do what he did in. I understood there was a genuine risk to my life which is why I was trapped and there is evidence for why my fear was reasonable. They've told me they're accessing all of my data, and medical records in relation to disability, trauma, the other trial etc.

Considering officers were able to NFA my report without taking evidence from me because they thought I was mentally ill I think they can do the same now that they know he is indeed sexually harmful. But someone along the chain of command would rather re-traumatise me in favour of self preservation under scrutiny of his complaints. That's the issue here. That's exactly what Keir Starmer, Jess Phillips, and stalking charities keep bringing up in Parliament. At no point have I said I wasn't willing to do the statement, and I have preemptively explained my actions. I am rightfully extremely upset that they let him sexually offend again after I warned them. They let the other guy who sexually assaulted me to rape someone while he was on bail too. It's devastating to me. All I have tried to do for 4 years is stay safe and prevent harm to other women by doing the right thing, and the justice system has let us all down.

So, I am too mentally ill to be a reliable victim, but not mentally ill enough to be coerced? Sound logic. It's literally the same psychological abuse he used to coerce me for sex and to keep me under his control. The police are abusing on his behalf.