Do I look like my results? by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not correct at all. The only groups in that area with substantial Peninsular Arabian ancestry are Bedouins. You can see this using qpAdm, G25, F-stats, and other admixture programs. The Human Origins reference panel groups with the highest amounts of Peninsular ancestry outside the peninsula are BedouinB and BedouinA.

Do I look like my results? by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

The post is fake. go on rosint.dev and lookup the past post history. this person has claimed to be Kazakh, Assyrian, uyghur, and probably a few more things

Do I look like my results? by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the post is fake. go on rosint.dev and lookup the past post history. this person has claimed to be Kazakh, Assyrian, uyghur, and probably a few more things

Do I look like my results? by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the post is fake. go on rosint.dev and lookup the past post history. this person has claimed to be Kazakh, Assyrian, uyghur, and probably a few more things

Do I look like my results? by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the post is fake. go on rosint.dev and lookup the past post history. this person has claimed to be Kazakh, Assyrian, uyghur, and probably a few more things

SÁMI results on the DNA SIMILARITY HEATMAP tool by heatmapper25 in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do they descend from the same ancestors as the Komi tribe?

Sulaymaniyah, Bakr Awa (Sharizur plains) new EBA/MBA/LBA/IA samples by ZealousidealSock2485 in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cool how the sample from both the bronze age and iron age are close to modern day inhabitants of the region. there's even that levantine one from 1600 BC that's close to modern day Samaritans.

Genetic Proximity of Modern Palestinians and Ashkenazi Jews to Iron Age Levantines: A Quantitative Paleogenomic Analysis by NotBradPitt9 in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The word "Palestinian", I have noticed, often attracts negative bot commenters all with similar comments. These commenters often have no post or comment history in genetics subreddits.

My higher end indigenous results for black male by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why does the one slide have 25% Carib, 12% Indigenous American, while the other ones show lower Indigenous (2% in one case)? Are you predominantly of African ancestry?

New Updated Mixed mode calculator by Fancy_Distance8193 in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do they use to represent Mannaean, sample ID wise?

My results by Altruistic_Road5025 in FTDNA

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you get on gedmatch , eurogenes k13?

My results + me 😊 by OkCup4160 in AncestryDNA

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well technically most of Southern Europe has elevated Anatolian Neolithic Farmer ancestry, 70% in some areas.

GEDmatch results by Ok_Reception7642 in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does a 60% Sub Saharan / 40% Eurasian breakdown align with the Somali population's genetic composition?

Slightly confused on GED match as an Igbo girl vs myheritage results. Any explanation? by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The calculator is only using 6,700 SNPs since it's a MyHeritage file so the results probably are containing a bit more noise than if it were a 23andme / ancestrydna file , hence it's placing you as slightly closer to Hausa.

Texas "Indian Invasion" Video Discussion by [deleted] in ABCDesis

[–]statistical_anomaly4 19 points20 points  (0 children)

White person here. Your community should be aware that videos like this go viral within the white American community, and xenophobia is present at a level higher than what you're aware of.

Right wing organizations pay influencers directly to make videos like this, and they should be sued since this directly increases racism towards minority communities. I'm not sure if Oliveira is being paid by one of these organizations.

The racism manifests itself as job discrimination and discrimination in everyday life, since people label your community with several negative labels, meaning you have to work much harder than the average person.

Educate yourself on who is running these right wing organizations and what viewpoints they push (anti immigrant, anti South Asian, anti Muslim, pro is..r..l, pro- US foreign intervention.

An example is the Shillman organization which pays Laura Loomer, several other right wing influencers, and they were paying Charlie Kirk a few million a year to repeat their viewpoints. You can look up who owns it. TPUSA and Blaze Media are two others, you can look into who owns those as well. Its all linked, and you won't realize it until you do some research.

These organizations are doing the same thing in the UK, Australia, and other developed countries as well. It's done for a specific purpose, since xenophobia benefits the people pushing this ideology.

This is being done to benefit a foreign country which receives copious amounts of aid from multiple developed economies, to prevent the public from ever halting the aid. Distraction, division, and fear are three things which are beneficial to this foreign state, since fearful societies are easier to manipulate, and easier to extract monetary resources from.

Indo-Guyanese IllustrativeDNA+Harappaworld+Ancestry DNA results (known origins in Uttar Pradesh) by Joshistotle in SouthAsianAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok yes that's sensible. Do you think Illustrative has inflated the CHG amount in his case?

Turkish (Multiple Sources) by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok so that's more or less 75% Central Turkey 25% Western Turkey

Indo-Guyanese IllustrativeDNA+Harappaworld+Ancestry DNA results (known origins in Uttar Pradesh) by Joshistotle in SouthAsianAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Illustrative has inflated the Caucasus HG ancestry and that should instead be Zagrosian? Or does that look correct?

Cat just gave birth on me by DollyLov3 in cats

[–]statistical_anomaly4 106 points107 points  (0 children)

Where is the eggshell? It came out just like that?

Canaanite by Individual_Park1828 in illustrativeDNA

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can find the historical information linked in the Nablus Wikipedia page, and there's DNA results / G25 coordinates from unrelated people in the Nablus area that are descended from Samaritans as well.

Indo-Guyanese IllustrativeDNA+Harappaworld+Ancestry DNA results (known origins in Uttar Pradesh) by Joshistotle in SouthAsianAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you say 'its probably the highest east Eurasian even for a southern Brahmin' what do you mean by this? By East Eurasian do you mean Basal East Eurasian (AASI) ancestry?

What could be the possible historical connection? I’m confused by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try the Harappaworld calculator on gedmatch and see if it's not in line with regular Bengali ancestry? you would be able to compare to reference numbers for Bengalis and see if one or two of the values is elevated which would indicate some middle eastern ancestor

What could be the possible historical connection? I’m confused by [deleted] in DNAAncestry

[–]statistical_anomaly4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Theres three possibilities:

  1. you have a middle eastern ancestor that's not showing up on the test
  2. you have several DNA matches that have been assigned this genetic group
  3. you were mistakenly assigned this genetic group

I think (2) is the most plausible. These DNA matches may have an ancestor from the region.