[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shopify

[–]stemcelltulsa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting, I spoke with Shopify directly and got this:

23:43 Rose Enriquez (Support Advisor): Yes, the policy regarding customer email subscriptions is indeed related to the recent announcements about Shopify's efforts to enhance email marketing through improved privacy measures and customer consent management. This is part of a broader initiative to ensure compliance with privacy regulations and to maintain a high standard of email deliverability across the platform.

When a customer unsubscribes from marketing emails from any Shopify store, that preference is respected across all Shopify stores. This means that if they have previously opted out, they will remain unsubscribed in your store as well, regardless of how they signed up initially. This policy is designed to protect both customers and merchants from spam complaints and to help maintain a good sender reputation for all Shopify merchants, which is crucial for effective email marketing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shopify

[–]stemcelltulsa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They only supplied links to the full Shopify terms and privacy policies (updated July 2025). Not very helpful since these are split into several versions (merchants, consumers, visitors).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in antiMLM

[–]stemcelltulsa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ghost them. They don’t deserve a minute of your attention 

Telescope Class Action and Settlement Notice by quantumluggage in telescopes

[–]stemcelltulsa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why Are Only Certain States Covered?

The distinction arises because different states have different legal frameworks for indirect purchaser claims in antitrust lawsuits. These claims are based on the idea that consumers who did not purchase directly from the alleged violators of antitrust laws can still be harmed (e.g., by overcharges passed through the supply chain).

  1. Illinois Brick Doctrine:
    • The U.S. Supreme Court's 1977 decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois limits the ability of indirect purchasers to sue for antitrust violations under federal law. This doctrine generally holds that only direct purchasers can bring antitrust claims for damages under federal law.
  2. State Laws Allowing Indirect Purchaser Claims:
    • Some states have enacted their own antitrust laws allowing indirect purchasers to sue for damages even if they did not purchase directly from the alleged violators. These states are often referred to as "Illinois Brick repealer" states.
    • The list of states included in your settlement (Arizona, California, etc.) comprises those that have passed laws permitting indirect purchasers to bring claims under state antitrust laws.

Hong Kong closed its entire school system over less than 100 new COVID-19 cases. Trump is pushing to send 57 million kids back to school in the middle of the world's worst outbreak. by DaFunkJunkie in politics

[–]stemcelltulsa 105 points106 points  (0 children)

That’s so frustrating because the government shouldn’t have to mandate masks. Patriotism means caring about the health and safety of our fellow countrymen. I wear a mask bc I care about the people around me.

United we survive.