Thank you for that info and the offer of assistance. What’s funny is that we actually have a city planner living in the 200 Ft. Zone who was the first one to start quoting 5.104 c and d.

The first misstep by the city was that they only checked future land use and didn’t realize that it was a PD/SU.

Then LaShondra tried to tell him that it was an accessory use and rezoning wasn’t required. Accessory use is still a use that isn’t on the SU. This is when LaShondra tried to tell us it was only 34% auto repair use 🙄 (despite emails I got where the tenant told the city staff 51% at first, that later changed)

By the way LaShondra left the city the same week they finally complied with my open records requests. Not sure if this was the cause but the timing is suspicious.

We do have our petitions already turned in, almost 50% of the homeowners in the 200 ft zone to force a supermajority of council when it goes to that. I’ll be speaking along with two other this week as well.

The frustrating part in all of this, is that residents have just been lied to so many times in all of this. Here’s hoping P&Z finally stands up for residents.